Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oxana Comanescu
dblp:184/5981
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Web and mobile security · 43% Authentication and access control · 32% Network security · 25% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control › authentication › authentication attack
credential theft |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Data Breaches, Phishing, or Malware?: Understanding the Risks of Stolen Credentials · CCS 2017 |
Web and mobile security › malicious advertising
malicious advertisement detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Cloak of Visibility: Detecting When Machines Browse a Different Web · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Authentication and access control › authentication
risk-based authentication |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Data Breaches, Phishing, or Malware?: Understanding the Risks of Stolen Credentials · CCS 2017 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Cloak of Visibility: Detecting When Machines Browse a Different Web · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Information retrieval › web search
search result manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Cloak of Visibility: Detecting When Machines Browse a Different Web · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
browsing profile comparison · 0.5IP blacklist analysis · 0.5phishing kit analysis · 0.3longitudinal measurement study · 0.3keylogger analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Data Breaches, Phishing, or Malware?: Understanding the Risks of Stolen CredentialsabstractIn this paper, we present the first longitudinal measurement study of the underground ecosystem fueling credential theft and assess the risk it poses to millions of users. Over the course of March, 2016--March, 2017, we identify 788,000 potential victims of off-the-shelf keyloggers; 12.4 million potential victims of phishing kits; and 1.9 billion usernames and passwords exposed via data breaches and traded on blackmarket forums. Using this dataset, we explore to what degree the stolen passwords---which originate from thousands of online services---enable an attacker to obtain a victim's valid email credentials---and thus complete control of their online identity due to transitive trust. Drawing upon Google as a case study, we find 7--25% of exposed passwords match a victim's Google account. For these accounts, we show how hardening authentication mechanisms to include additional risk signals such as a user's historical geolocations and device profiles helps to mitigate the risk of hijacking. Beyond these risk metrics, we delve into the global reach of the miscreants involved in credential theft and the blackhat tools they rely on. We observe a remarkable lack of external pressure on bad actors, with phishing kit playbooks and keylogger capabilities remaining largely unchanged since the mid-2000s. Kurt Thomas, Frank Li 0001, Ali Zand, Jacob Barrett, Juri Ranieri, Luca Invernizzi, Yarik Markov, Oxana Comanescu, Vijay Eranti, Angelique Moscicki, Dan Margolis, Vern Paxson, Elie Bursztein |
CCS | 8 |
| 2016 | Cloak of Visibility: Detecting When Machines Browse a Different WebabstractThe contentious battle between web services and miscreants involved in blackhat search engine optimization and malicious advertisements has driven the underground to develop increasingly sophisticated techniques that hide the true nature of malicious sites. These web cloaking techniques hinder the effectiveness of security crawlers and potentially expose Internet users to harmful content. In this work, we study the spectrum of blackhat cloaking techniques that target browser, network, or contextual cues to detect organic visitors. As a starting point, we investigate the capabilities of ten prominent cloaking services marketed within the underground. This includes a first look at multiple IP blacklists that contain over 50 million addresses tied to the top five search engines and tens of anti-virus and security crawlers. We use our findings to develop an anti-cloaking system that detects split-view content returned to two or more distinct browsing profiles with an accuracy of 95.5% and a false positive rate of 0.9% when tested on a labeled dataset of 94,946 URLs. We apply our system to an unlabeled set of 135,577 search and advertisement URLs keyed on high-risk terms (e.g., luxury products, weight loss supplements) to characterize the prevalence of threats in the wild and expose variations in cloaking techniques across traffic sources. Our study provides the first broad perspective of cloaking as it affects Google Search and Google Ads and underscores the minimum capabilities necessary of security crawlers to bypass the state of the art in mobile, rDNS, and IP cloaking. Luca Invernizzi, Kurt Thomas, Alexandros Kapravelos, Oxana Comanescu, Jean-Michel Picod, Elie Bursztein |
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy | 4 |