Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladimir Dubikhin

dblp:184/7289 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-3843-3541ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 74% Integrated circuit design · 26%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification
0.522020
Automating the Design of Asynchronous Logic Control for AMS Electronics · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Advances in Formal Methods for the Design of Analog/Mixed-Signal Systems: Invited · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
asynchronous circuit synthesis
0.412020
Automating the Design of Asynchronous Logic Control for AMS Electronics · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.412020
Automating the Design of Asynchronous Logic Control for AMS Electronics · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Integrated circuit design
analog and mixed-signal circuits
0.422020
Advances in Formal Methods for the Design of Analog/Mixed-Signal Systems: Invited · DAC 2017
Automating the Design of Asynchronous Logic Control for AMS Electronics · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
analog/mixed-signal verification
0.312017
Advances in Formal Methods for the Design of Analog/Mixed-Signal Systems: Invited · DAC 2017
Integrated circuit design
asynchronous circuit design
0.312017
Advances in Formal Methods for the Design of Analog/Mixed-Signal Systems: Invited · DAC 2017
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.312017
Advances in Formal Methods for the Design of Analog/Mixed-Signal Systems: Invited · DAC 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

analog-to-asynchronous components · 0.4RTL synthesis · 0.4formal verification · 0.3asynchronous design · 0.3analog/asynchronous co-design · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Automating the Design of Asynchronous Logic Control for AMS Electronics
abstract
Analog and mixed signal (AMS) electronics becomes increasingly complex and needs to be digitally enhanced by its own control circuitry. The RTL synthesis flow routinely used for digital logic is, however, optimized for synchronous data processing and produces inefficient control for AMS. In this paper, we demonstrate the evident benefits of asynchronous circuits in the context of AMS systems, and propose an asynchronous design for analog electronics (A4A) flow for their specification, synthesis, and formal verification. A library of specialized analog-to-asynchronous (A2A) components is developed for interfacing analog and asynchronous worlds. A4A flow is automated in the Workcraft framework and evaluated using a multiphase buck converter case study, where A2A components are employed to sanitize analog sensor readings. Timing analysis of asynchronous buck control shows improved response time: 4× reaction to high-load and 7× to under-voltage condition, compared with a 333 MHz clocked controller (to achieve a similar response time, a clocked controller would require ~3 GHz frequency). The simulation results of a 4-phase asynchronous buck demonstrate improved voltage ripple and peak current -16% and 12% reduction, respectively. These benefits lead to the higher efficiency of power conversion, and can be traded off for the cost of analog components, e.g., coils. Moreover, the use of the proposed design flow and tools helps to improve design productivity and overall robustness of AMS circuits.
Danil Sokolov, Victor Khomenko, Andrey Mokhov, Vladimir Dubikhin, Alexandre Yakovlev
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.4
2017 Advances in Formal Methods for the Design of Analog/Mixed-Signal Systems: Invited
abstract
Analog/mixed-signal (AMS) systems are rapidly expanding in all domains of information and communication technology. They are a critical part of the support for large-scale high-performance digital systems, provide important functionalities in medium-scale embedded and mobile systems, and act as a core organ of autonomous electronics such as sensor nodes. Analog and digital parts are closely intermixed, hence demanding AMS design methods and tools to be more holistic. In particular, the emergence of "little digital" electronics inside or near analog circuitry calls for the increasing use of asynchronous logic. To cope with the growing complexity of AMS designs, formal methods are required to complement traditional simulation approaches. This paper presents an overview of the state-of-the-art in AMS formal verification and asynchronous design that enables the development of analog/asynchronous co-design methods. One such co-design methodology is exemplified by the LEMA-Workcraft workflow currently under development by the authors.
Vladimir Dubikhin, Chris J. Myers, Danil Sokolov, Ioannis Syranidis, Alexandre Yakovlev
DAC1
2017 Benefits of asynchronous control for analog electronics: Multiphase buck case study
abstract
Analog and mixed signal (AMS) electronics becomes increasingly complex and needs to be digitally enhanced by its own control circuitry. The RTL synthesis flow routinely used for digital logic is however optimized for synchronous data processing and produces inefficient control for AMS. In this paper we demonstrate the evident benefits of asynchronous circuits in the context of AMS systems, and propose an asynchronous design for analog electronics (A4A) flow for their specification, synthesis, and formal verification. A library of specialized analog-to-asynchronous (A2A) components is developed for interfacing analog signals to asynchronous control. A4A flow is automated in the Workcraft framework and evaluated using a multiphase buck converter case study. The simulation results show improved response time, voltage ripple, and peak current of the buck when controlled asynchronously. These benefits lead to the higher efficiency of power conversion, and can be traded off for the cost of analog components. A4A flow, A2A interfaces, and Workcraft tools are used for development of power converters at Dialog Semiconductor.
Danil Sokolov, Vladimir Dubikhin, Victor Khomenko, Andrey Mokhov, Alexandre Yakovlev
DATE2