Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiahong Yan
dblp:184/7396
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Web and mobile security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fact-R1: Towards Explainable Video Misinformation Detection with Deep Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fact-R1: Towards Explainable Video Misinformation Detection with Deep Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Web and mobile security › harmful content detection
misinformation detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fact-R1: Towards Explainable Video Misinformation Detection with Deep Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.7group relative policy optimization · 1.7direct preference optimization · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fact-R1: Towards Explainable Video Misinformation Detection with Deep ReasoningabstractThe rapid spread of multimodal misinformation on social media has raised growing concerns, while research on video misinformation detection remains limited due to the lack of large-scale, diverse datasets. Existing methods often overfit to rigid templates and lack deep reasoning over deceptive content. To address these challenges, we introduce FakeVV, a large-scale benchmark comprising over 100,000 video-text pairs with fine-grained, interpretable annotations. In addition, we further propose Fact-R1, a novel framework that integrates deep reasoning with collaborative rule-based reinforcement learning. Fact-R1 is trained through a three-stage process: (1) misinformation long-Chain-of-Thought (CoT) instruction tuning, (2) preference alignment via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and (3) Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using a novel verifiable reward function. This enables Fact-R1 to exhibit emergent reasoning behaviors comparable to those observed in advanced text-based reinforcement learning systems, but in the more complex multimodal misinformation setting. Our work establishes a new paradigm for misinformation detection, bridging large-scale video understanding, reasoning-guided alignment, and interpretable verification. Fanrui Zhang, Qiang Zhang 0051, Jun Chen 0005, Sinbadliu, Junxiong Lin, Jiahong Yan, Jiawei Liu 0001, Zhengjun Zha |
NeurIPS | 7 |