Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naveen Neelakandan

dblp:184/8073 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 44% Compilers and program optimization · 44% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › program instrumentation
instrumentation optimization
0.212016
Optimizing customized program coverage · ASE 2016
Software testing
test coverage
0.212016
Optimizing customized program coverage · ASE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

runtime overhead optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Optimizing customized program coverage
abstract
Program coverage is used across many stages of software development. While common during testing, program coverage has also found use outside the test lab, in production software. However, production software has stricter requirements on run-time overheads, and may limit possible program instrumentation. Thus, optimizing the placement of probes to gather program coverage is important.
Peter Ohmann, David Bingham Brown, Naveen Neelakandan, Jeff T. Linderoth, Ben Liblit
ASE3