Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothy Tunnell
dblp:184/8083
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software maintenance and evolution · 68% Empirical software engineering · 32% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › release engineering
continuous integration |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Trade-offs in continuous integration: assurance, security, and flexibility · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2017 Usage, costs, and benefits of continuous integration in open-source projects · ASE 2016 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Usage, costs, and benefits of continuous integration in open-source projects · ASE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.5semi-structured interviews · 0.3repository mining · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Trade-offs in continuous integration: assurance, security, and flexibilityabstractContinuous integration (CI) systems automate the compilation, building, and testing of software. Despite CI being a widely used activity in software engineering, we do not know what motivates developers to use CI, and what barriers and unmet needs they face. Without such knowledge, developers make easily avoidable errors, tool builders invest in the wrong direction, and researchers miss opportunities for improving the practice of CI. We present a qualitative study of the barriers and needs developers face when using CI. We conduct semi-structured interviews with developers from different industries and development scales. We triangulate our findings by running two surveys. We find that developers face trade-offs between speed and certainty (Assurance), between better access and information security (Security), and between more configuration options and greater ease of use (Flexi- bility). We present implications of these trade-offs for developers, tool builders, and researchers. Michael Hilton 0001, Nicholas Nelson 0002, Timothy Tunnell, Darko Marinov, Danny Dig |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 3 |
| 2016 | Usage, costs, and benefits of continuous integration in open-source projectsabstractContinuous integration (CI) systems automate the compilation, building, and testing of software. Despite CI rising as a big success story in automated software engineering, it has received almost no attention from the research community. For example, how widely is CI used in practice, and what are some costs and benefits associated with CI? Without answering such questions, developers, tool builders, and researchers make decisions based on folklore instead of data. In this paper, we use three complementary methods to study the usage of CI in open-source projects. To understand which CI systems developers use, we analyzed 34,544 open-source projects from GitHub. To understand how developers use CI, we analyzed 1,529,291 builds from the most commonly used CI system. To understand why projects use or do not use CI, we surveyed 442 developers. With this data, we answered several key questions related to the usage, costs, and benefits of CI. Among our results, we show evidence that supports the claim that CI helps projects release more often, that CI is widely adopted by the most popular projects, as well as finding that the overall percentage of projects using CI continues to grow, making it important and timely to focus more research on CI. Michael Hilton 0001, Timothy Tunnell, Darko Marinov, Danny Dig |
ASE | 2 |