Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Arntzenius
dblp:184/8339
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-0417-5636ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 50% Compilers and program optimization · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Logic in computer science › logic programming
answer set programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Finite-Choice Logic Programming · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Logic in computer science
logic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Finite-Choice Logic Programming · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Logic in computer science › logic programming
stable model semantics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Finite-Choice Logic Programming · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems › functional programming
higher-order functional languages |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seminaïve evaluation for a higher-order functional language · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2020 |
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seminaïve evaluation for a higher-order functional language · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fixed-point semantics · 0.9semi-naïve evaluation · 0.4program transformation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Finite-Choice Logic ProgrammingabstractLogic programming, as exemplified by datalog, defines the meaning of a program as its unique smallest model: the deductive closure of its inference rules. However, many problems call for an enumeration of models that vary along some set of choices while maintaining structural and logical constraints—there is no single canonical model. The notion of stable models for logic programs with negation has successfully captured programmer intuition about the set of valid solutions for such problems, giving rise to a family of programming languages and associated solvers known as answer set programming. Unfortunately, the definition of a stable model is frustratingly indirect, especially in the presence of rules containing free variables. We propose a new formalism, finite-choice logic programming, that uses choice, not negation, to admit multiple solutions. Finite-choice logic programming contains all the expressive power of the stable model semantics, gives meaning to a new and useful class of programs, and enjoys a least-fixed-point interpretation over a novel domain. We present an algorithm for exploring the solution space and prove it correct with respect to our semantics. Our implementation, the Dusa logic programming language, has performance that compares favorably with state-of-the-art answer set solvers and exhibits more predictable scaling with problem size. Chris Martens 0001, Robert J. Simmons, Michael Arntzenius |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 3 |
| 2020 | Seminaïve evaluation for a higher-order functional languageabstractOne of the workhorse techniques for implementing bottom-up Datalog engines is seminaïve evaluation. This optimization improves the performance of Datalog's most distinctive feature: recursively defined predicates. These are computed iteratively, and under a naïve evaluation strategy, each iteration recomputes all previous values. Seminaïve evaluation computes a safe approximation of the difference between iterations. This can asymptotically improve the performance of Datalog queries. Seminaïve evaluation is defined partly as a program transformation and partly as a modified iteration strategy, and takes advantage of the first-order nature of Datalog code. This paper extends the seminaïve transformation to higher-order programs written in the Datafun language, which extends Datalog with features like first-class relations, higher-order functions, and datatypes like sum types. Michael Arntzenius, Neelakantan R. Krishnaswami |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2016 | Datafun: a functional DatalogabstractDatalog may be considered either an unusually powerful query language or a carefully limited logic programming language. Datalog is declarative, expressive, and optimizable, and has been applied successfully in a wide variety of problem domains. However, most use-cases require extending Datalog in an application-specific manner. In this paper we define Datafun, an analogue of Datalog supporting higher-order functional programming. The key idea is to track monotonicity with types. Michael Arntzenius, Neelakantan R. Krishnaswami |
ICFP | 1 |