Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefano Cristalli

dblp:185/1654 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0124-4467ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › memory safety
memory corruption
0.512021
Glyph: Efficient ML-Based Detection of Heap Spraying Attacks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021
Systems and software security
exploitation
0.212016
Micro-Virtualization Memory Tracing to Detect and Prevent Spraying Attacks · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Operating systems
virtualization
0.112016
Micro-Virtualization Memory Tracing to Detect and Prevent Spraying Attacks · USENIX Security Symposium 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

memory tracing · 0.5memory n-grams · 0.5machine learning · 0.5information entropy · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AttackDefense Framework (ADF): Enhancing IoT Devices and Lifecycles Threat Modeling
abstract
Threat modeling (TM) is essential to manage, prevent, and fix security and privacy issues in our society. TM requires a data model to represent threats and tools to exploit such data. Current TM data models and tools have significant limitations preventing their usage in real-world scenarios. For example, it is challenging to TM embedded devices with current data models and tools as they cannot model their hardware, firmware, and low-level software. Moreover, it is impossible to TM a device lifecycle or security-privacy tradeoffs as these data models and tools were developed for other use cases (e.g., software security or user privacy). We fill this relevant gap by presenting the AttackDefense Framework (ADF), which provides a novel data model and related tools to augment TM. ADF’s building block is the AD object that can be used to represent heterogeneous and complex threats. Moreover, ADF provides automations to process a collection of AD objects, including ways to create sets, maps, chains, trees, and wordclouds of AD objects. We present ADF , a toolkit implementing ADF composed of four modules (Catalog, Parse, Check, and Analyze). We confirm that the data model and tools provided by ADF are useful by running an extensive set of experiments while threat modeling a crypto wallet and its lifecycle. Our experiments involved seven expert groups from academia and industry, each using the ADF on an orthogonal threat class. The evaluation generated 175 high-quality ADs covering ISA/IEC 62433-4-1 SecDev Lifecycle, side-channels, fault injection, microarchitectural attacks, speculative execution, pre-silicon testing, invasive physical chip modifications, Bluetooth protocol and implementation threats, and FIDO2 authentication.
Tommaso Sacchetti, Marton Bognar, Jesse De Meulemeester, Benedikt Gierlichs, Frank Piessens, Volodymyr Bezsmertnyi, Maria Chiara Molteni, Stefano Cristalli, Arianna Gringiani, Olivier Thomas, Daniele Antonioli
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.8
2021 Glyph: Efficient ML-Based Detection of Heap Spraying Attacks
abstract
Heap spraying is probably the most simple and effective memory corruption attack, which fills the memory with malicious payloads and then jumps at a random location in hopes of starting the attacker's routines. To counter this threat, GRAFFITI has been recently proposed as the first OS-agnostic framework for monitoring memory allocations of arbitrary applications at runtime; however, the main contributions of GRAFFITI are on the monitoring system, and its detection engine only considers simple heuristics which are tailored to certain attack vectors and are easily evaded. In this article, we aim to overcome this limitation and propose GLYPH as the first ML-based heap spraying detection system, which is designed to be effective, efficient, and resilient to evasive attackers. GLYPH relies on the information monitored by GRAFFITI, and we investigate the effectiveness of different feature spaces based on information entropy and memory n-grams, and discuss the several engineering challenges we have faced to make GLYPH efficient with an overhead compatible with that of GRAFFITI. To evaluate GLYPH, we build a representative dataset with several variants of heap spraying attacks, and assess GLYPH's resilience against evasive attackers through selective hold-out experiments. Results show that GLYPH achieves high accuracy in detecting spraying and is able to generalize well, outperforming the state-of-the-art approach for heap spraying detection, NOZZLE. Finally, we thoroughly discuss the trade-offs between detection performance and runtime overhead of GLYPH's different configurations.
Fabio Pierazzi, Stefano Cristalli, Danilo Bruschi, Michele Colajanni, Mirco Marchetti, Andrea Lanzi
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2019 Detecting (absent) app-to-app authentication on cross-device short-distance channels
abstract
Short-distance or near-field communication is increasingly used by mobile apps for interacting or exchanging data in a cross-device fashion. In this paper, we identify a security issue, namely cross-device app-to-app communication hijacking (or CATCH), that affect Android apps using short-distance channels (e.g., Bluetooth and Wi-Fi-Direct). This issue causes unauthenticated or malicious app-to-app interactions even when the underlying communication channels are authenticated and secured. In addition to discovering the security issue, we design an algorithm based on data-flow analysis for detecting the presence of CATCH in Android apps. Our algorithm checks if a given app contains an app-to-app authentication scheme, necessary for preventing CATCH. We perform experiments on a set of Android apps and show the CATCH problem is always present on the whole analyzed applications set. We also discuss the impact of the problem in real scenarios by presenting two real case studies. At the end of the paper we reported limitations of our model along with future improvements.
Stefano Cristalli, Long Lu, Danilo Bruschi, Andrea Lanzi
ACSAC1
2019 BootKeeper: Validating Software Integrity Properties on Boot Firmware Images
abstract
Boot firmware, like UEFI-compliant firmware, has been the target of numerous attacks, giving the attacker control over the entire system while being undetected. The measured boot mechanism of a computer platform ensures its integrity by using cryptographic measurements to detect such attacks. This is typically performed by relying on a Trusted Platform Module (TPM). Recent work, however, shows that vendors do not respect the specifications that have been devised to ensure the integrity of the firmware's loading process. As a result, attackers may bypass such measurement mechanisms and successfully load a modified firmware image while remaining unnoticed. In this paper we introduce BootKeeper, a static analysis approach verifying a set of key security properties on boot firmware images before deployment, to ensure the integrity of the measured boot process. We evaluate BootKeeper against several attacks on common boot firmware implementations and demonstrate its applicability.
Ronny Chevalier, Stefano Cristalli, Christophe Hauser, Yan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang 0001, Christopher Krügel, Giovanni Vigna, Danilo Bruschi, Andrea Lanzi
CODASPY2
2018 Trusted Execution Path for Protecting Java Applications Against Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Stefano Cristalli, Edoardo Vignati, Danilo Bruschi, Andrea Lanzi
RAID1
2016 Micro-Virtualization Memory Tracing to Detect and Prevent Spraying Attacks
Stefano Cristalli, Mattia Pagnozzi, Mariano Graziano, Andrea Lanzi, Davide Balzarotti
USENIX Security Symposium1