Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward Lloyd Snelson

dblp:185/2034 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 95% Optimization for machine learning · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 78% Recommender systems · 22%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.132008
Sparse Gaussian Processes using Pseudo-inputs · NIPS 2005
Warped Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2003
Learning to rank with SoftRank and Gaussian processes · SIGIR 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.112009
Bayesian inference for Plackett-Luce ranking models · ICML 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation
0.112009
Bayesian inference for Plackett-Luce ranking models · ICML 2009
Recommender systems › choice modeling
plackett-luce model
0.112009
Bayesian inference for Plackett-Luce ranking models · ICML 2009
Information retrieval › ranking
ranking model
0.112009
Bayesian inference for Plackett-Luce ranking models · ICML 2009
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.112008
Learning to rank with SoftRank and Gaussian processes · SIGIR 2008
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
NDCG optimization
0.112008
Learning to rank with SoftRank and Gaussian processes · SIGIR 2008
Information retrieval › retrieval evaluation
ranking evaluation
0.112008
Learning to rank with SoftRank and Gaussian processes · SIGIR 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process
0.122008
Sparse Gaussian Processes using Pseudo-inputs · NIPS 2005
Learning to rank with SoftRank and Gaussian processes · SIGIR 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
posterior predictive distribution
0.112005
Compact approximations to Bayesian predictive distributions · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › non-stationary gaussian process
warped gaussian process
0.012003
Warped Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization
0.022005
Sparse Gaussian Processes using Pseudo-inputs · NIPS 2005
Warped Gaussian Processes · NIPS 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood · 0.2Power EP · 0.2thurstonian model · 0.2softrank · 0.2sparse gaussian processes · 0.1sparse gaussian process · 0.1gradient-based optimization · 0.1expectation propagation · 0.1bayesian regression · 0.1KL divergence minimization · 0.1non-linear transformation learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 De-Layering Social Networks by Shared Tastes of Friendships
Laura Dietz, Ben Gamari, John Guiver, Edward Lloyd Snelson, Ralf Herbrich
ICWSM4
2009 Bayesian inference for Plackett-Luce ranking models
abstract
This paper gives an efficient Bayesian method for inferring the parameters of a Plackett-Luce ranking model. Such models are parameterised distributions over rankings of a finite set of objects, and have typically been studied and applied within the psychometric, sociometric and econometric literature. The inference scheme is an application of Power EP (expectation propagation). The scheme is robust and can be readily applied to large scale data sets. The inference algorithm extends to variations of the basic Plackett-Luce model, including partial rankings. We show a number of advantages of the EP approach over the traditional maximum likelihood method. We apply the method to aggregate rankings of NASCAR racing drivers over the 2002 season, and also to rankings of movie genres.
John Guiver, Edward Lloyd Snelson
ICML2
2008 Learning to rank with SoftRank and Gaussian processes
abstract
In this paper we address the issue of learning to rank for document retrieval using Thurstonian models based on sparse Gaussian processes. Thurstonian models represent each document for a given query as a probability distribution in a score space; these distributions over scores naturally give rise to distributions over document rankings. However, in general we do not have observed rankings with which to train the model; instead, each document in the training set is judged to have a particular relevance level: for example "Bad", "Fair", "Good", or "Excellent". The performance of the model is then evaluated using information retrieval (IR) metrics such as Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG). Recently Taylor et al. presented a method called SoftRank which allows the direct gradient optimisation of a smoothed version of NDCG using a Thurstonian model. In this approach, document scores are represented by the outputs of a neural network, and score distributions are created artificially by adding random noise to the scores. The SoftRank mechanism is a general one; it can be applied to different IR metrics, and make use of different underlying models. In this paper we extend the SoftRank framework to make use of the score uncertainties which are naturally provided by a Gaussian process (GP), which is a probabilistic non-linear regression model. We further develop the model by using sparse Gaussian process techniques, which give improved performance and efficiency, and show competitive results against baseline methods when tested on the publicly available LETOR OHSUMED data set. We also explore how the available uncertainty information can be used in prediction and how it affects model performance.
John Guiver, Edward Lloyd Snelson
SIGIR2
2006 Variable Noise and Dimensionality Reduction for Sparse Gaussian processes
Edward Lloyd Snelson, Zoubin Ghahramani
UAI1
2005 Compact approximations to Bayesian predictive distributions
abstract
We provide a general framework for learning precise, compact, and fast representations of the Bayesian predictive distribution for a model. This framework is based on minimizing the KL divergence between the true predictive density and a suitable compact approximation. We consider various methods for doing this, both sampling based approximations, and deterministic approximations such as expectation propagation. These methods are tested on a mixture of Gaussians model for density estimation and on binary linear classification, with both synthetic data sets for visualization and several real data sets. Our results show significant reductions in prediction time and memory footprint.
Edward Lloyd Snelson, Zoubin Ghahramani
ICML1
2005 Sparse Gaussian Processes using Pseudo-inputs
abstract
We present a new Gaussian process (GP) regression model whose covariance is parameterized by the the locations of M pseudo-input points, which we learn by a gradient based optimization. We take M N, where N is the number of real data points, and hence obtain a sparse regression method which has O(M 2 N ) training cost and O(M 2 ) prediction cost per test case. We also find hyperparameters of the covariance function in the same joint optimization. The method can be viewed as a Bayesian regression model with particular input dependent noise. The method turns out to be closely related to several other sparse GP approaches, and we discuss the relation in detail. We finally demonstrate its performance on some large data sets, and make a direct comparison to other sparse GP methods. We show that our method can match full GP performance with small M , i.e. very sparse solutions, and it significantly outperforms other approaches in this regime.
Edward Lloyd Snelson, Zoubin Ghahramani
NIPS1
2003 Warped Gaussian Processes
abstract
We generalise the Gaussian process (GP) framework for regression by learning a nonlinear transformation of the GP outputs. This allows for non-Gaussian processes and non-Gaussian noise. The learning algo- rithm chooses a nonlinear transformation such that transformed data is well-modelled by a GP. This can be seen as including a preprocessing transformation as an integral part of the probabilistic modelling problem, rather than as an ad-hoc step. We demonstrate on several real regression problems that learning the transformation can lead to significantly better performance than using a regular GP, or a GP with a fixed transformation.
Edward Lloyd Snelson, Carl E. Rasmussen, Zoubin Ghahramani
NIPS1