Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan Ong

dblp:185/5595 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0003-3806-4894ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 77% Image recognition and object detection · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.312017
Automatic Understanding of Image and Video Advertisements · CVPR 2017
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
advertisement analysis
0.312017
Automatic Understanding of Image and Video Advertisements · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112017
Automatic Understanding of Image and Video Advertisements · CVPR 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal annotation · 0.6baseline classification · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards Including Instructor Features in Student Grade Prediction
Nathan Ong, Jiaye Zhu, Daniel Mossé
EDM1
2017 Automatic Understanding of Image and Video Advertisements
abstract
There is more to images than their objective physical content: for example, advertisements are created to persuade a viewer to take a certain action. We propose the novel problem of automatic advertisement understanding. To enable research on this problem, we create two datasets: an image dataset of 64,832 image ads, and a video dataset of 3,477 ads. Our data contains rich annotations encompassing the topic and sentiment of the ads, questions and answers describing what actions the viewer is prompted to take and the reasoning that the ad presents to persuade the viewer (What should I do according to this ad, and why should I do it?), and symbolic references ads make (e.g. a dove symbolizes peace). We also analyze the most common persuasive strategies ads use, and the capabilities that computer vision systems should have to understand these strategies. We present baseline classification results for several prediction tasks, including automatically answering questions about the messages of the ads.
Zaeem Hussain, Xiaozhong Zhang, Keren Ye, Christopher Thomas 0004, Zuha Agha, Nathan Ong, Adriana Kovashka
CVPR7
2017 Histological Detection of High-Risk Benign Breast Lesions from Whole Slide Images
Akif Burak Tosun, Luong Nguyen, Nathan Ong, Olga Navolotskaia, Gloria Carter, Jeffrey L. Fine, D. Lansing Taylor, S. Chakra Chennubhotla
MICCAI (2)3