Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreea-Ina Radu

dblp:185/6240 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7374-8162ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 70% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure payment
EMV payment protocol
0.612022
Practical EMV Relay Protection · SP 2022
Authentication and access control
relay attack resistance
0.612022
Practical EMV Relay Protection · SP 2022
Authentication and access control
user authentication
0.612022
Practical EMV Relay Protection · SP 2022
Authentication and access control › proximity-based authentication
relay attack
0.212022
Practical EMV Relay Protection · SP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tamarin prover · 0.6formal verification · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Practical EMV Relay Protection
abstract
Relay attackers can forward messages between a contactless EMV bank card and a shop reader, making it possible to wirelessly pickpocket money. To protect against this, Apple Pay requires a user’s fingerprint or Face ID to authorise payments, while Mastercard and Visa have proposed protocols to stop such relay attacks. We investigate transport payment modes and find that we can build on relaying to bypass the Apple Pay lock screen, and illicitly pay from a locked iPhone to any EMV reader, for any amount, without user authorisation. We show that Visa’s proposed relay-countermeasure can be bypassed using rooted smart phones. We analyse Mastercard’s relay protection, and show that its timing bounds could be more reliably imposed at the ISO 14443 protocol level, rather than at the EMV protocol level. With these insights, we propose a new relay-resistance protocol (L1RP) for EMV. We use the Tamarin prover to model mobile-phone payments with and without user authentication, and in different payment modes. We formally verify solutions to our attack suggested by Apple and Visa, and used by Samsung, and we verify that our proposed protocol provides protection from relay attacks.
Andreea-Ina Radu, Tom Chothia, Christopher J. P. Newton, Ioana Boureanu, Liqun Chen 0002
SP1
2016 LeiA: A Lightweight Authentication Protocol for CAN
Andreea-Ina Radu, Flavio D. Garcia
ESORICS (2)1