EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yury D. Nechipurenko
dblp:185/8359
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
microarray probe design |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Optimization of signal-to-noise ratio for efficient microarray probe design · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Optimization of signal-to-noise ratio for efficient microarray probe design · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thermodynamic modeling · 0.2sequence analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Optimization of signal-to-noise ratio for efficient microarray probe designabstractMOTIVATION: Target-specific hybridization depends on oligo-probe characteristics that improve hybridization specificity and minimize genome-wide cross-hybridization. Interplay between specific hybridization and genome-wide cross-hybridization has been insufficiently studied, despite its crucial role in efficient probe design and in data analysis. RESULTS: In this study, we defined hybridization specificity as a ratio between oligo target-specific hybridization and oligo genome-wide cross-hybridization. A microarray database, derived from the Genomic Comparison Hybridization (GCH) experiment and performed using the Affymetrix platform, contains two different types of probes. The first type of oligo-probes does not have a specific target on the genome and their hybridization signals are derived from genome-wide cross-hybridization alone. The second type includes oligonucleotides that have a specific target on the genomic DNA and their signals are derived from specific and cross-hybridization components combined together in a total signal. A comparative analysis of hybridization specificity of oligo-probes, as well as their nucleotide sequences and thermodynamic features was performed on the database. The comparison has revealed that hybridization specificity was negatively affected by low stability of the fully-paired oligo-target duplex, stable probe self-folding, G-rich content, including GGG motifs, low sequence complexity and nucleotide composition symmetry. CONCLUSION: Filtering out the probes with defined 'negative' characteristics significantly increases specific hybridization and dramatically decreasing genome-wide cross-hybridization. Selected oligo-probes have two times higher hybridization specificity on average, compared to the probes that were filtered from the analysis by applying suggested cutoff thresholds to the described parameters. A new approach for efficient oligo-probe design is described in our study. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Olga V. Matveeva, Yury D. Nechipurenko, Evgeniy Riabenko, Chikako Ragan, Nafisa N. Nazipova, Aleksey Y. Ogurtsov, Svetlana A. Shabalina |
Bioinform. | 2 |