Sequential logic synthesis expands the solution space compared to combinational logic synthesis by reasoning about the reachable states of memory elements, leading to better Power-Performance-Area (PPA) outcomes. As gate costs continue to rise in advanced technologies, sequential logic synthesis is gaining significant traction within the EDA community as a powerful alternative. This paper introduces a scalable algorithm for don’t-care-based sequential logic synthesis, leveraging sequential k-step induction to perform redundancy removal and resubstitution under Sequential Observability Don’t Cares (SODCs). SODCs generalize Observability Don’t Cares (ODCs) by explicitly considering reachable states, making SODC-based optimization a challenging problem due to dependencies and alignment issues between the base case and inductive case in k-step induction. Our approach overcomes these challenges, fully utilizing the potential of SODCs without limiting the solution space. We rigorously prove the correctness of our approach, discuss some limitations arising from bounded-step induction, and analyze how our approach can effectively be used in practice to exploit obscure optimization opportunities. Implemented as part of an industrial tool, our algorithm achieves an average -6.9% area improvement after technology mapping compared to state-of-the-art sequential synthesis methods, and further provides 3.16% and 1.06% reductions in combinational and sequential areas, respectively, in post place-and-route results. Furthermore, all optimizations are efficiently verified using industrial sequential verification tools.

Sequential logic synthesis can provide better Power-Performance-Area (PPA) than combinational logic synthesis since it explores a larger solution space. As the gate cost in advanced technologies keeps rising, sequential logic synthesis provides a powerful alternative that is gaining momentum in the EDA community. In this work, we present a new scalable algorithm for don't-care-based sequential logic synthesis. Our new approach is based on sequential k-step induction and can apply both redundancy removal and resubstitution transformations under Sequential Observability Don't Cares (SODCs). Using SODC-based optimizations with induction is a challenging problem due to dependencies and alignment of don't cares among the base case and the inductive case. We propose a new approach utilizing the full power of SODCs without limiting the solution space. Our algorithm is implemented as part of an industrial tool and achieves a 6.9% average area improvement after technology mapping when compared to state-of-the-art sequential synthesis methods. Moreover, all the new sequential optimizations can be verified using state-of-the-art sequential verification tools.

Adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron (AQFP) circuits are a family of superconducting electronic (SCE) circuits that have recently gained growing interest due to their low-energy consumption, and may serve as alternative technology to overcome the down-scaling limitations of CMOS. AQFP logic design differs from classic digital design because logic cells are natively abstracted by the majority function, require data and clocking in specific timing windows, and have fan-out limitations. We describe here a novel majority-based logic synthesis flow addressing AQFP technology. In particular, we present both algebraic and Boolean methods over majority-inverter graphs (MIGs) aiming at optimizing size and depth of logic circuits. The technology limitations and constraints of the AQFP technology (e.g., path balancing and maximum fanout) are considered during optimization. The experimental results show that our flow reduces both size and depth of MIGs, while meeting the constraint of the AQFP technology. Further, we show an improvement for both area and delay when the MIGs are mapped into the AQFP technology.

Look-up Table (LUT) mapping and optimization is an important step in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) design. The effectiveness of LUT synthesis improved dramatically in the last decades, thanks to optimization and mapping innovations naturally tailored for FPGAs. In this paper, we develop a new LUT-based optimization flow that is tailored for the synthesis of Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) rather than FPGAs. We enhance LUT mapping to consider the literal/AIG cost of LUT nodes. We extend traditional Boolean methods to simplify and re-shape LUT-networks, targeting the best AIG/mapped-network implementation, after decomposition. Intuitively, literal-driven LUT packing behaves as a powerful fanin-bound node elimination, unveiling higher-order Boolean simplification opportunities. We embed our proposed LUT-based optimization flow, area oriented, in a commercial synthesis tool. Using our methodology, we improve 12 of the best area results in the EPFL synthesis competition. Employed in a commercial EDA flow for ASICs, our LUT optimization reduces area by 1.80%, total negative slack by 0.39%, and switching power by 1.72%, after physical implementation, at 5% runtime cost.

Most logic synthesis algorithms work on graph representations of logic functions with nodes associated with arbitrary logic expressions or simple logic functions and iteratively optimize such graphs. While recent multilevel logic synthesis efforts focused primarily on graphs with 2-input nodes such as AND and OR gates, the recently proposed paradigm of Majority-Inverter Graphs (MIGs) instead uses the 3-input Majority gate as the node function. As this technique proved to be a success, it is natural to ask: are there other 3-input gates better suited for logic synthesis? Motivated by this question, we investigate the relative advantages of 3-input gates as constituents of logic networks. We consider representative gates from each of the ten nondegenerate 3-input NPN classes and study how powerful they are at representing Boolean functions. Using SAT-based exact synthesis, we evaluate each 3-input gate using the minimum number of such gates (together with inverters) needed to synthesize all 4-input Boolean functions and a subset of frequent 5-input and 6-input Boolean functions. We show that the logic gate Dot(x,y,z) \mathrel \mathrel \mathop:= x ⊕(z Vxy) outperforms the rest in terms of expressive power. We further confirm this observation by showing that Dot-Inverter Graph representations are more than 14% smaller as compared to MIG representations of EPFL benchmarks.

SAT-sweeping is a powerful method for simplifying logic networks. It consists of merging gates that are proven equivalent (up to complementation) by running simulation and SAT solving in synergy. SAT-sweeping is used in both verification and synthesis applications within EDA. In this paper, we focus on the development of a highly efficient, synthesis-oriented, SAT-sweeping engine. We introduce a new algorithm to guide initial simulation, which strongly reduces the number of false candidates for merge, thus increasing the computational efficiency of the sweeper. We revisit the SAT-sweeping flow in light of practical considerations for synthesis, with the aim of proving all valid merges and ensuring fast execution. Experimental results confirm remarkable speedup deriving from our methodology, up to 10× for large combinational networks, and better QoR as compared to previous SAT-sweeping implementation. Embedded in a commercial synthesis flow, our proposes SAT-sweeper enables area and power savings of 1.98% and 1.81%, respectively, with neutral timing at negligible runtime overhead, over 36 testcases.

Emerging technologies such as plasmonics and photonics are promising alternatives to CMOS for high throughput applications, thanks to their waveguide's low power consumption and high speed of computation. Besides these qualities, these novel technologies also implement logic functionalities uncommon to traditional technologies that can be beneficial to existing CMOS architectures. In this work, we study how plasmonic-based devices can complement CMOS technology to achieve a more efficient implementation of multiplier architectures, which are the core of state-of-the-art data- and signal-processing circuits. A critical part of modern multipliers is the partial-product reduction step, used to reduce the partial product tree into a 2-input addition. In CMOS technology, this step is achieved by using compact and fast counters. On the other hand, the proposed plasmonic cells naturally implement counters of 3-, 9- and 27-inputs within a few logic levels at ultra-high speed. Thus, we present novel multiplier architectures, which take advantage of large plasmonic-based counters to reduce the number of cells and logic levels in the partial product reduction step of the multiplication. Our experimental results show that 3 levels and 30 counters are needed when 27-input cells are used. On the other side, 6 levels and 72 counters are employed with 9-input cells. Finally, we present various 16 × 16 multiplier implementations mixing 9- and 27-input cells, focusing on the trade-off in the number of counters, levels, and area of each architecture.

Logic synthesis is a fundamental step in the realization of modern integrated circuits. It has traditionally been employed for the optimization of CMOS-based designs, as well as for emerging technologies and quantum computing. Recently, it found application in minimizing the number of AND gates in cryptography benchmarks represented as xor-and graphs (XAGs). The number of AND gates in an XAG, which is called the logic network's multiplicative complexity, plays a critical role in various cryptography and security protocols such as fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) and secure multi-party computation (MPC). Further, the number of AND gates is also important to assess the degree of vulnerability of a Boolean function, and influences the cost of techniques to protect against side-channel attacks. However, so far a complete logic synthesis flow for reducing the multiplicative complexity in logic networks did not exist or relied heavily on manual manipulations. In this paper, we present a logic synthesis toolbox for cryptography and security applications. The proposed tool consists of powerful transformations, namely resubstitution, refactoring, and rewriting, specifically designed to minimize the multiplicative complexity of an XAG. Our flow is fully automatic and achieves significant results over both EPFL benchmarks and cryptography circuits. We improve the best-known results for cryptography up to 59%, resulting in a normalized geometric mean of 0.82.

This paper proposes a novel methodology for multi-level logic synthesis that is independent from a specific graph data-structure, but formulates synthesis procedures using an abstract concept definition of a logic representation. The idea is to capture the essence of optimisations in a general manner and tailor only small performance-critical sections to the underlying logic representation. This generic, yet scalable approach, saves many man-months of development time and enables logic synthesis and technology-mapping procedures parameterised in a logic representation. We present the generic design methodology and demonstrate its practicality by providing a complete state-of-the-art logic synthesis flow.

Reducing the number of AND gates plays a central role in many cryptography and security applications. We propose a logic synthesis algorithm and tool to minimize the number of AND gates in a logic network composed of AND, XOR, and inverter gates. Our approach is fully automatic and exploits cut enumeration algorithms to explore optimization potentials in local subcircuits. The experimental results show that our approach can reduce the number of AND gates by 34% on average compared to generic size optimization algorithms. Further, we are able to reduce the number of AND gates up to 76% in best-known benchmarks from the cryptography community.

With the continuous push to improve Quality of Results (QoR) in EDA, Boolean methods in logic synthesis have been recently drawing the attention of researchers. Boolean methods achieve better QoR than algebraic methods but require higher computational cost. In this paper, we introduce the Scalable Boolean Method (SBM) framework. The SBM consists of 4 optimization engines designed to be scalable in a modern synthesis flow. The first presented engine is a generalized resubstitution framework based on computing, and implementing, the Boolean difference between two nodes. The second consists of a gradient-based AIG optimization, while the third one is based on heterogeneous elimination for kerneling. The last proposed engine is a revisiting of maximum set of permissible functions computation with BDDs. Altogether, the SBM framework enables significant synthesis results. We improve 12 of the best known area results in the EPFL synthesis competition. Embedded in a commercial EDA flow, the new Boolean methods enable -2.20% combinational area savings and -5.99% total negative slack reduction, after physical implementation, at contained runtime cost.

Logic synthesis is an enabling technology to realize integrated computing systems, and it entails solving computationally intractable problems through a plurality of heuristic techniques. A recent push toward further formalization of synthesis problems has shown to be very useful toward both attempting to solve some logic problems exactly-which is computationally possible for instances of limited size today-as well as creating new and more powerful heuristics based on problem decomposition. Moreover, technological advances including nanodevices, optical computing, and quantum and quantum cellular computing require new and specific synthesis flows to assess feasibility and scalability. This review highlights recent progress in logic synthesis and optimization, describing models, data structures, and algorithms, with specific emphasis on both design quality and emerging technologies. Example applications and results of novel techniques to established and emerging technologies are reported.

We consider the problem of decomposing monotone Boolean functions into majority-of-three operations, with a particular focus on decomposing the majority-$n$n function. When targeting monotone Boolean functions, Shannon's expansion can be expressed by a single majority-of-three operation. We exploit this property to transform binary decision diagrams (BDDs) for monotone functions into majority-inverter graphs (MIGs), using a simple one-to-one mapping. This process highlights desirable properties for further majority graph optimization, e.g., symmetries between the inputs of primitive operations, which are not apparent from BDDs. Although our construction yields a quadratic upper bound on the number of majority-3 operations required to realize majority-$n$n, for small $n$n the concrete values are much smaller compared to those obtained from previous constructions which have linear and quasi-linear asymptotic upper bounds. Further, we demonstrate that minimum size MIGs, for the monotone functions majority-5 and majority-7, can be obtained applying a small number of algebraic transformations to the BDD.

The majority function $\langle xyz\rangle$ evaluates to true, if at least two of its Boolean inputs evaluate to true. The majority function has frequently been studied as a central primitive in logic synthesis applications for many decades. Knuth refers to the majority function in the last volume of his seminal The Art of Computer Programming as “probably the most important ternary operation in the entire universe.” Majority logic sythesis has recently regained signficant interest in the design automation community due to nanoemerging technologies which operate based on the majority function. In addition, majority logic synthesis has successfully been employed in CMOS-based applications such as standard cell or FPGA mapping. This tutorial gives a broad introduction into the field of majority logic synthesis. It will review fundamental results and describe recent contributions from theory, practice, and applications.

In this paper, we study exact multi-level logic benchmarks. We refer to an exact logic benchmark, or exact benchmark in short, as the optimal implementation of a given Boolean function, in terms of minimum number of logic levels and/or nodes. Exact benchmarks are of paramount importance to design automation because they allow engineers to test the efficiency of heuristic techniques used in practice. When dealing with two-level logic circuits, tools to generate exact benchmarks are available, e.g., espresso-exact, and scale up to relatively large size. However, when moving to modern multi-level logic circuits, the problem of deriving exact benchmarks is inherently more complex. Indeed, few solutions are known. In this paper, we present a scalable method to generate exact multi-level benchmarks with the optimum, or provably close to the optimum, number of logic levels. Our technique involves concepts from graph theory and joint support decomposition. Experimental results show an asymptotic exponential gap between state-of-the-art synthesis techniques and our exact results. Our findings underline the need for strong new research in logic synthesis.

The performance of some emerging nanotechnologies benefits from wave pipelining. The design of such circuits requires new models and algorithms. Thus we show how Majority-Inverter Graphs (MIG) can be used for this purpose and we extend the related optimization algorithms. The resulting designs have increased throughput, something that has traditionally been a weak point for the majority of non-charge-based technologies. We benchmark the algorithm on MIG netlists with three different technologies, Spin Wave Devices (SWD), Quantum-dot Cellular Automata (QCA), and NanoMagnetic Logic (NML). We find that the wave pipelined version of the netlists have an improvement in throughput over power of 23×, 13×, and 5× for SWD, QCA, and NML, respectively. In terms of throughput over area ratio, the improvement is 5×, 8×, and 3×, respectively.