Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lukas von Stumberg
dblp:186/8102
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4708-3742ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 70% Robot navigation and mapping · 20% Learning theory · 9% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment · ICLR 2024 D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual Odometry · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | MonoRec: Semi-Supervised Dense Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments From a Single Moving Camera · CVPR 2021 D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual Odometry · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
direct image alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment · ICLR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MonoRec: Semi-Supervised Dense Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments From a Single Moving Camera · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene reconstruction
dynamic scene reconstruction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MonoRec: Semi-Supervised Dense Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments From a Single Moving Camera · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › single-view 3d reconstruction
monocular dense reconstruction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MonoRec: Semi-Supervised Dense Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments From a Single Moving Camera · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MonoRec: Semi-Supervised Dense Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments From a Single Moving Camera · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual Odometry · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual odometry
monocular visual odometry |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual Odometry · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › self-supervised depth estimation
self-supervised monocular depth estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual Odometry · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual Odometry · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual odometry
direct sparse odometry |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Direct Sparse Visual-Inertial Odometry Using Dynamic Marginalization · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual odometry
visual-inertial odometry |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Direct Sparse Visual-Inertial Odometry Using Dynamic Marginalization · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Direct Sparse Visual-Inertial Odometry Using Dynamic Marginalization · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised feature embeddings · 0.8gauss-newton loss · 0.8semi-supervised learning · 0.5multi-view stereo · 0.5moving object mask prediction · 0.5cost volume · 0.5self-supervised learning · 0.4nonlinear optimization · 0.4direct visual odometry · 0.4bundle adjustment · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image AlignmentabstractDirect image alignment is a widely used technique for relative 6DoF pose estimation between two images, but its accuracy strongly depends on pose initialization.
Therefore, recent end-to-end frameworks increase the convergence basin of the learned feature descriptors with special training objectives, such as the Gauss-Newton loss.
However, the training data may exhibit bias toward a specific type of motion and pose initialization,
thus limiting the generalization of these methods.
In this work, we derive a closed-form solution to the expected optimum of the Gauss-Newton loss.
The solution is agnostic to the underlying feature representation and allows us to dynamically adjust the basin of convergence according to our assumptions about the uncertainty in the current estimates. These properties allow for effective control over the convergence in the alignment process.
Despite using self-supervised feature embeddings, our solution achieves compelling accuracy w.r.t. the state-of-the-art direct image alignment methods trained end-to-end with pose supervision, and demonstrates improved robustness to pose initialization.
Our analytical solution exposes some inherent limitations of end-to-end learning with the Gauss-Newton loss, and establishes an intriguing connection between direct image alignment and feature-matching approaches. Sergei Solonets, Daniil Sinitsyn, Lukas von Stumberg, Nikita Araslanov, Daniel Cremers |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | MonoRec: Semi-Supervised Dense Reconstruction in Dynamic Environments From a Single Moving CameraabstractIn this paper, we propose MonoRec, a semi-supervised monocular dense reconstruction architecture that predicts depth maps from a single moving camera in dynamic environments. MonoRec is based on a multi-view stereo setting which encodes the information of multiple consecutive images in a cost volume. To deal with dynamic objects in the scene, we introduce a MaskModule that predicts moving object masks by leveraging the photometric inconsistencies encoded in the cost volumes. Unlike other multi-view stereo methods, MonoRec is able to reconstruct both static and moving objects by leveraging the predicted masks. Furthermore, we present a novel multi-stage training scheme with a semi-supervised loss formulation that does not require LiDAR depth values. We carefully evaluate MonoRec on the KITTI dataset and show that it achieves state-of-theart performance compared to both multi-view and singleview methods. With the model trained on KITTI, we furthermore demonstrate that MonoRec is able to generalize well to both the Oxford RobotCar dataset and the more challenging TUM-Mono dataset recorded by a handheld camera. Code and related materials are available at https://vision.in.tum.de/research/monorec. Felix Wimbauer, Nan Yang 0007, Lukas von Stumberg, Niclas Zeller, Daniel Cremers |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2020 | LM-Reloc: Levenberg-Marquardt Based Direct Visual RelocalizationabstractWe present LM-Reloc-a novel approach for visual relocalization based on direct image alignment. In contrast to prior works that tackle the problem with a feature-based formulation, the proposed method does not rely on feature matching and RANSAC. Hence, the method can utilize not only corners but any region of the image with gradients. In particular, we propose a loss formulation inspired by the classical Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to train LM-Net. The learned features significantly improve the robustness of direct image alignment, especially for relocalization across different conditions. To further improve the robustness of LM-Net against large image baselines, we propose a pose estimation network, CorrPoseNet, which regresses the relative pose to bootstrap the direct image alignment. Evaluations on the CARLA and Oxford RobotCar relocalization tracking benchmark show that our approach delivers more accurate results than previous state-of-the-art methods while being comparable in terms of robustness. Lukas von Stumberg, Patrick Wenzel, Nan Yang 0007, Daniel Cremers |
3DV | 1 |
| 2020 | D3VO: Deep Depth, Deep Pose and Deep Uncertainty for Monocular Visual OdometryabstractWe propose D3VO as a novel framework for monocular visual odometry that exploits deep networks on three levels -- deep depth, pose and uncertainty estimation. We first propose a novel self-supervised monocular depth estimation network trained on stereo videos without any external supervision. In particular, it aligns the training image pairs into similar lighting condition with predictive brightness transformation parameters. Besides, we model the photometric uncertainties of pixels on the input images, which improves the depth estimation accuracy and provides a learned weighting function for the photometric residuals in direct (feature-less) visual odometry. Evaluation results show that the proposed network outperforms state-of-the-art self-supervised depth estimation networks. D3VO tightly incorporates the predicted depth, pose and uncertainty into a direct visual odometry method to boost both the front-end tracking as well as the back-end non-linear optimization. We evaluate D3VO in terms of monocular visual odometry on both the KITTI odometry benchmark and the EuRoC MAV dataset. The results show that D3VO outperforms state-of-the-art traditional monocular VO methods by a large margin. It also achieves comparable results to state-of-the-art stereo/LiDAR odometry on KITTI and to the state-of-the-art visual-inertial odometry on EuRoC MAV, while using only a single camera. Nan Yang 0007, Lukas von Stumberg, Rui Wang 0037, Daniel Cremers |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | Rolling-Shutter Modelling for Direct Visual-Inertial OdometryabstractWe present a direct visual-inertial odometry (VIO) method which estimates the motion of the sensor setup and sparse 3D geometry of the environment based on measurements from a rolling-shutter camera and an inertial measurement unit (IMU). The visual part of the system performs a photometric bundle adjustment on a sparse set of points. This direct approach does not extract feature points and is able to track not only corners, but any pixels with sufficient gradient magnitude. Neglecting rolling-shutter effects in the visual part severely degrades accuracy and robustness of the system. In this paper, we incorporate a rolling-shutter model into the photometric bundle adjustment that estimates a set of recent keyframe poses and the inverse depth of a sparse set of points. IMU information is accumulated between several frames using measurement preintegration, and is inserted into the optimization as an additional constraint between selected keyframes. For every keyframe we estimate not only the pose but also velocity and biases to correct the IMU measurements. Unlike systems with global-shutter cameras, we use both IMU measurements and rolling-shutter effects of the camera to estimate velocity and biases for every state. Last, we evaluate our system on a new dataset that contains global-shutter and rolling-shutter images, IMU data and ground-truth poses for ten different sequences, which we make publicly available. Evaluation shows that the proposed method outperforms a system where rolling shutter is not modelled and achieves similar accuracy to the global-shutter method on global-shutter data. David Schubert, Nikolaus Demmel, Lukas von Stumberg, Vladyslav Usenko, Daniel Cremers |
IROS | 3 |
| 2018 | Direct Sparse Visual-Inertial Odometry Using Dynamic MarginalizationabstractWe present VI-DSO, a novel approach for visual-inertial odometry, which jointly estimates camera poses and sparse scene geometry by minimizing photometric and IMU measurement errors in a combined energy functional. The visual part of the system performs a bundle-adjustment like optimization on a sparse set of points, but unlike key-point based systems it directly minimizes a photometric error. This makes it possible for the system to track not only corners, but any pixels with large enough intensity gradients. IMU information is accumulated between several frames using measurement preintegration and is inserted into the optimization as an additional constraint between keyframes. We explicitly include scale and gravity direction into our model and jointly optimize them together with other variables such as poses. As the scale is often not immediately observable using IMU data this allows us to initialize our visual-inertial system with an arbitrary scale instead of having to delay the initialization until everything is observable. We perform partial marginalization of old variables so that updates can be computed in a reasonable time. In order to keep the system consistent we propose a novel strategy which we call “dynamic marginalization”. This technique allows us to use partial marginalization even in cases where the initial scale estimate is far from the optimum. We evaluate our method on the challenging EuRoC dataset, showing that VI-DSO outperforms the state of the art. Lukas von Stumberg, Vladyslav Usenko, Daniel Cremers |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2017 | Real-time trajectory replanning for MAVs using uniform B-splines and a 3D circular bufferabstractIn this paper, we present a real-time approach to local trajectory replanning for microaerial vehicles (MAVs). Current trajectory generation methods for multicopters achieve high success rates in cluttered environments, but assume that the environment is static and require prior knowledge of the map. In the presented study, we use the results of such planners and extend them with a local replanning algorithm that can handle unmodeled (possibly dynamic) obstacles while keeping the MAV close to the global trajectory. To ensure that the proposed approach is real-time capable, we maintain information about the environment around the MAV in an occupancy grid stored in a three-dimensional circular buffer, which moves together with a drone, and represent the trajectories by using uniform B-splines. This representation ensures that the trajectory is sufficiently smooth and simultaneously allows for efficient optimization. Vladyslav Usenko, Lukas von Stumberg, Andrej Pangercic, Daniel Cremers |
IROS | 2 |