Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam W. Tow

dblp:186/8140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 61% Segmentation and scene understanding · 27% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.622018
Cartman: The Low-Cost Cartesian Manipulator that Won the Amazon Robotics Challenge · ICRA 2018
The ACRV picking benchmark: A robotic shelf picking benchmark to foster reproducible research · ICRA 2017
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
few-shot segmentation
0.312018
Semantic Segmentation from Limited Training Data · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
pick-and-place
0.312018
Cartman: The Low-Cost Cartesian Manipulator that Won the Amazon Robotics Challenge · ICRA 2018
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.312018
Semantic Segmentation from Limited Training Data · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation
warehouse automation
0.312018
Cartman: The Low-Cost Cartesian Manipulator that Won the Amazon Robotics Challenge · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
reproducible benchmarking
0.312017
The ACRV picking benchmark: A robotic shelf picking benchmark to foster reproducible research · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Robot manipulation › industrial robot
cartesian robot arm
0.112018
Cartman: The Low-Cost Cartesian Manipulator that Won the Amazon Robotics Challenge · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
manipulator design
0.112018
Cartman: The Low-Cost Cartesian Manipulator that Won the Amazon Robotics Challenge · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pixel-wise voting · 0.3experience-centred design · 0.3deep metric learning · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3evaluation protocol · 0.3benchmark design · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Semantic Segmentation from Limited Training Data
abstract
We present our approach for robotic perception in cluttered scenes that led to winning the recent Amazon Robotics Challenge (ARC) 2017. Next to small objects with shiny and transparent surfaces, the biggest challenge of the 2017 competition was the introduction of unseen categories. In contrast to traditional approaches which require large collections of annotated data and many hours of training, the task here was to obtain a robust perception pipeline with only few minutes of data acquisition and training time. To that end, we present two strategies that we explored. One is a deep metric learning approach that works in three separate steps: semantic-agnostic boundary detection, patch classification and pixel-wise voting. The other is a fully-supervised semantic segmentation approach with efficient dataset collection. We conduct an extensive analysis of the two methods on our ARC 2017 dataset. Interestingly, only few examples of each class are sufficient to fine-tune even very deep convolutional neural networks for this specific task.
Anton Milan, Trung Pham, Kumar Vijay, Douglas Morrison, Adam W. Tow, Lingqiao Liu, Jordan Erskine, Riccardo Grinover, Alec Gurman, Thomas Hunn, Norton Kelly-Boxall, Darryl Qijun Lee, Matthew McTaggart, Gerald Rallos, Andrew Razjigaev, Thomas James Rowntree, Rohan Smith, Sean Wade-McCue, Zheyu Zhuang, Chris Lehnert, Guosheng Lin, Ian D. Reid 0001, Peter I. Corke, Jürgen Leitner
ICRA5
2018 Cartman: The Low-Cost Cartesian Manipulator that Won the Amazon Robotics Challenge
abstract
The Amazon Robotics Challenge enlisted sixteen teams to each design a pick-and-place robot for autonomous warehousing, addressing development in robotic vision and manipulation. This paper presents the design of our custom-built, cost-effective, Cartesian robot system Cartman, which won first place in the competition finals by stowing 14 (out of 16) and picking all 9 items in 27 minutes, scoring a total of 272 points. We highlight our experience-centred design methodology and key aspects of our system that contributed to our competitiveness. We believe these aspects are crucial to building robust and effective robotic systems.
Douglas Morrison, Adam W. Tow, M. McTaggart, Norton Kelly-Boxall, Sean Wade-McCue, Jordan Erskine, R. Grinover, A. Gurman, T. Hunn, Anton Milan, Trung Pham, G. Rallos, A. Razjigaev, T. Rowntree, K. Vijay, Zheyu Zhuang, Chris Lehnert, Ian D. Reid 0001, Peter I. Corke, Jürgen Leitner
ICRA2
2017 The ACRV picking benchmark: A robotic shelf picking benchmark to foster reproducible research
abstract
Robotic challenges like the Amazon Picking Challenge (APC) or the DARPA Challenges are an established and important way to drive scientific progress. They make research comparable on a well-defined benchmark with equal test conditions for all participants. However, such challenge events occur only occasionally, are limited to a small number of contestants, and the test conditions are very difficult to replicate after the main event. We present a new physical benchmark challenge for robotic picking: the ACRV Picking Benchmark. Designed to be reproducible, it consists of a set of 42 common objects, a widely available shelf, and exact guidelines for object arrangement using stencils. A well-defined evaluation protocol enables the comparison of complete robotic systems - including perception and manipulation - instead of sub-systems only. Our paper also describes and reports results achieved by an open baseline system based on a Baxter robot.
Jürgen Leitner, Adam W. Tow, Niko Sünderhauf, Jake E. Dean, Joseph W. Durham, Matthew Cooper 0005, Markus Eich, Chris Lehnert, Ruben Mangels, Chris McCool, Peter Kujala, Lachlan Nicholson, Trung Pham, James Sergeant, Liao Wu, Fangyi Zhang, Ben Upcroft, Peter I. Corke
ICRA2