Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Miles Hutson
dblp:186/8208
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 70% Image recognition and object detection · 23% Segmentation and scene understanding · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Policy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
representation learning for control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Policy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
task-aware reconstruction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Policy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Policy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Policy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
task-aware reconstruction loss · 0.8pretrained segmentation model · 0.8adversarial learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Policy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learningabstractModel-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) is a promising route to sample-efficient policy optimization. However, a known vulnerability of reconstruction-based MBRL consists of scenarios in which detailed aspects of the world are highly predictable, but irrelevant to learning a good policy. Such scenarios can lead the model to exhaust its capacity on meaningless content, at the cost of neglecting important environment dynamics. While existing approaches attempt to solve this problem, we highlight its continuing impact on leading MBRL methods ---including DreamerV3 and DreamerPro--- with a novel environment where background distractions are intricate, predictable, and useless for planning future actions. To address this challenge we develop a method for focusing the capacity of the world model through a synergy of a pretrained segmentation model, a task-aware reconstruction loss, and adversarial learning. Our method outperforms a variety of other approaches designed to reduce the impact of distractors, and is an advance towards robust model-based reinforcement learning. Miles Hutson, Isaac Kauvar, Nick Haber |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Iterative Quality Control Strategies for Expert Medical Image LabelingabstractData quality is a key concern for artificial intelligence (AI) efforts that rely on crowdsourced data collection. In the domain of medicine in particular, labeled data must meet high quality standards, or the resulting AI may perpetuate biases or lead to patient harm. What are the challenges involved in expert medical labeling? How do AI practitioners address such challenges? In this study, we interviewed members of teams developing AI for medical imaging in four subdomains (ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and dermatology) about their quality-related practices. We describe one instance of low-quality labeling being caught by automated monitoring. The more proactive strategy, however, is to partner with experts in a collaborative, iterative process prior to the start of high-volume data collection. Best practices including 1) co-designing labeling tasks and instructional guidelines with experts, 2) piloting and revising the tasks and guidelines, and 3) onboarding workers enable teams to identify and address issues before they proliferate. Beverly Freeman, Naama Hammel, Sonia Phene, Abigail Huang, Rebecca Ackermann, Olga Kanzheleva, Miles Hutson, Caitlin Taggart, Quang Duong 0004, Rory Sayres |
HCOMP | 7 |