Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mingxiao Li 0004
dblp:186/8921-4
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-5542-3148ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 51% Language models and text generation · 49% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
3.3 | 4 | 2025 | On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHF · ICLR 2025 SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without Hyperparameters · ICLR 2025 Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHF · ICLR 2025 SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without Hyperparameters · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHF · ICLR 2025 How to Leverage Demonstration Data in Alignment for Large Language Model? A Self-Imitation Learning Perspective · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment · NeurIPS 2024 On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHF · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without Hyperparameters · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
self-imitation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | How to Leverage Demonstration Data in Alignment for Large Language Model? A Self-Imitation Learning Perspective · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | How to Leverage Demonstration Data in Alignment for Large Language Model? A Self-Imitation Learning Perspective · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inverse perplexity objective · 0.9imitation learning objective · 0.9implicit reward calibration · 0.8density ratio estimation · 0.8convex loss functions · 0.8calibrated direct preference optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without HyperparametersabstractExisting preference optimization objectives for language model alignment require additional hyperparameters that must be extensively tuned to achieve optimal performance, increasing both the complexity and time required for fine-tuning large language models. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective hyperparameter-free preference optimization algorithm for alignment. We observe that promising performance can be achieved simply by optimizing inverse perplexity, which is calculated as the inverse of the exponentiated average log-likelihood of the chosen and rejected responses in the preference dataset. The resulting simple learning objective, SimPER, is easy to implement and eliminates the need for expensive hyperparameter tuning and a reference model, making it both computationally and memory efficient. Extensive experiments on widely used real-world benchmarks, including MT-Bench, AlpacaEval 2, and 10 key benchmarks of the Open LLM Leaderboard with 5 base models, demonstrate that SimPER consistently and significantly outperforms existing approaches—even without any hyperparameters or a reference model. For example, despite its simplicity, SimPER outperforms state-of-the-art methods by up to 5.7 points on AlpacaEval 2 and achieves the highest average ranking across 10 benchmarks on the Open LLM Leaderboard. The source code for SimPER is publicly available at: https://github.com/tengxiao1/SimPER. Teng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Zhengyu Chen 0001, Mingxiao Li 0004, Shangsong Liang, Zhaochun Ren, Vasant G. Honavar |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHFabstractThis work studies the alignment of large language models with preference data from an imitation learning perspective. We establish a close theoretical connection between reinforcement learning from human feedback RLHF and imitation learning (IL), revealing that RLHF implicitly performs imitation learning on the preference data distribution. Building on this connection, we propose DIL, a principled framework that directly optimizes the imitation learning objective. DIL provides a unified imitation learning perspective on alignment, encompassing existing alignment algorithms as special cases while naturally introducing new variants. By bridging IL and RLHF, DIL offers new insights into alignment with RLHF. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DIL outperforms existing methods on various challenging benchmarks. Teng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Mingxiao Li 0004, Zhengyu Chen 0001, Vasant G. Honavar |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | How to Leverage Demonstration Data in Alignment for Large Language Model? A Self-Imitation Learning PerspectiveabstractThis paper introduces a novel generalized selfimitation learning (GSIL) framework, which effectively and efficiently aligns large language models with offline demonstration data.We develop GSIL by deriving a surrogate objective of imitation learning with density ratio estimates, facilitating the use of self-generated data and optimizing the imitation learning objective with simple classification losses.GSIL eliminates the need for complex adversarial training in standard imitation learning, achieving lightweight and efficient fine-tuning for large language models.In addition, GSIL encompasses a family of offline losses parameterized by a general class of convex functions for density ratio estimation and enables a unified view for alignment with demonstration data.Extensive experiments show that GSIL consistently and significantly outperforms baselines in many challenging benchmarks, such as coding (HuamnEval), mathematical reasoning (GSM8K) and instruction-following benchmark (MT-Bench).Code is public available at https://github.com/tengxiao1/GSIL. Teng Xiao, Mingxiao Li 0004, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Chao Cui, Vasant G. Honavar |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2024 | Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentabstractWe study the problem of aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preference data. Contrastive preference optimization has shown promising results in aligning LLMs with available preference data by optimizing the implicit reward associated with the policy. However, the contrastive objective focuses mainly on the relative values of implicit rewards associated with two responses while ignoring
their actual values, resulting in suboptimal alignment with human preferences. To address this limitation, we propose calibrated direct preference optimization (Cal-DPO), a simple yet effective algorithm. We show that substantial improvement in alignment with the given preferences can be achieved simply by calibrating the implicit reward to ensure that the learned implicit rewards are comparable in
scale to the ground-truth rewards. We demonstrate the theoretical advantages of Cal-DPO over existing approaches. The results of our experiments on a variety of standard benchmarks show that Cal-DPO remarkably improves off-the-shelf methods. Teng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Huaisheng Zhu, Mingxiao Li 0004, Vasant G. Honavar |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Exploiting User Preferences for Multiscenarios in Query-Less SearchabstractOnline travel platforms (OTPs), for example, booking.com, Ctrip.com, and Fliggy, deliver travel experiences to online users by providing travel-related products. Hotel recommendation is significantly important for OTPs since hotel bookings account for almost half of the travel expenses and hotel products generate more than half of OTP’s revenues. More than 58% Fliggy users may choose to use query-less hotel searches to find candidate hotels, where no additional keywords are given except the expected check-in date and travel destination city. Thus, how to recommend hotels to traveler users is important and challenging. In this article, we explore the unique characteristics of query-less hotel users and propose a novel multiscenario query-less search network (MSQS). According to their searching date, expected check-in date, current city, and expected hotel city, MSQS groups users’ behaviors (e.g., click, purchase, search) into four scenario groups, namely today-local, today-nonlocal, future-local, and future-nonlocal. The key components of MSQS are the global expert, the scenario expert, and the feedback expert. The global expert learns common features among different scenarios and extracts the feature interactions between context, users, and hotels. The scenario expert utilizes multilayer perception to learn the differentiating features between scenarios. The feedback expert learns users’ preferences for hotels in different scenarios through their historical behaviors, and a scenario interest extractor is carefully designed to enhance attention across scenarios and behaviors. An offline experiment on the Fliggy production dataset with over 8 million users and 0.49 million travel items and an online A/B test both show that MSQS effectively predicts users’ hotel booking intentions. Yuyu Yin, Nan Zhang 0036, Zulong Chen, Mingxiao Li 0004, Yu Li 0015, Honghao Gao |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. | 4 |