Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laurence Liaubet

dblp:187/5534 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0201-0264ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics
0.412019
ASICS: an R package for a whole analysis workflow of 1D 1H NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
NMR spectroscopy
0.412019
ASICS: an R package for a whole analysis workflow of 1D 1H NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
statistical methods for omics data
0.112019
ASICS: an R package for a whole analysis workflow of 1D 1H NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.4spectral preprocessing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Asterics: a simple tool for the ExploRation and Integration of omiCS data
abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid development of omics acquisition techniques has induced the production of a large volume of heterogeneous and multi-level omics datasets, which require specific and sometimes complex analyses to obtain relevant biological information. Here, we present ASTERICS (version 2.5), a publicly available web interface for the analyses of omics datasets. RESULTS: ASTERICS is designed to make both standard and complex exploratory and integration analysis workflows easily available to biologists and to provide high quality interactive plots. Special care has been taken to provide a comprehensive documentation of the implemented analyses and to guide users toward sound analysis choices regarding some specific omics data. Data and analyses are organized in a comprehensive graphical workflow within ASTERICS workspace to facilitate the understanding of successive data editions and analyses leading to a given result. CONCLUSION: ASTERICS provides an easy to use platform for omics data exploration and integration. The modular organization of its open source code makes it easy to incorporate new workflows and analyses by external contributors. ASTERICS is available at https://asterics.miat.inrae.fr and can also be deployed using provided docker images.
Élise Maigné, Céline Noirot, Julien Henry, Yaa Adu Kesewaah, Ludovic Badin, Sébastien Déjean, Camille Guilmineau, Arielle Krebs, Fanny Mathevet, Audrey Segalini, Laurent Thomassin, David Colongo, Christine Gaspin, Laurence Liaubet, Nathalie Vialaneix
BMC Bioinform.14
2019 ASICS: an R package for a whole analysis workflow of 1D 1H NMR spectra
abstract
MOTIVATION: In metabolomics, the detection of new biomarkers from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra is a promising approach. However, this analysis remains difficult due to the lack of a whole workflow that handles spectra pre-processing, automatic identification and quantification of metabolites and statistical analyses, in a reproducible way. RESULTS: We present ASICS, an R package that contains a complete workflow to analyse spectra from NMR experiments. It contains an automatic approach to identify and quantify metabolites in a complex mixture spectrum and uses the results of the quantification in untargeted and targeted statistical analyses. ASICS was shown to improve the precision of quantification in comparison to existing methods on two independent datasets. In addition, ASICS successfully recovered most metabolites that were found important to explain a two level condition describing the samples by a manual and expert analysis based on bucketing. It also found new relevant metabolites involved in metabolic pathways related to risk factors associated with the condition. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ASICS is distributed as an R package, available on Bioconductor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Gaëlle Lefort, Laurence Liaubet, Cécile Canlet, Patrick Tardivel, Marie-Christine Père, Hélène Quesnel, Alain Paris, Nathalie Iannuccelli, Nathalie Vialaneix, Rémi Servien
Bioinform.2
2016 Handling missing rows in multi-omics data integration: multiple imputation in multiple factor analysis framework
abstract
BACKGROUND: In omics data integration studies, it is common, for a variety of reasons, for some individuals to not be present in all data tables. Missing row values are challenging to deal with because most statistical methods cannot be directly applied to incomplete datasets. To overcome this issue, we propose a multiple imputation (MI) approach in a multivariate framework. In this study, we focus on multiple factor analysis (MFA) as a tool to compare and integrate multiple layers of information. MI involves filling the missing rows with plausible values, resulting in M completed datasets. MFA is then applied to each completed dataset to produce M different configurations (the matrices of coordinates of individuals). Finally, the M configurations are combined to yield a single consensus solution. RESULTS: We assessed the performance of our method, named MI-MFA, on two real omics datasets. Incomplete artificial datasets with different patterns of missingness were created from these data. The MI-MFA results were compared with two other approaches i.e., regularized iterative MFA (RI-MFA) and mean variable imputation (MVI-MFA). For each configuration resulting from these three strategies, the suitability of the solution was determined against the true MFA configuration obtained from the original data and a comprehensive graphical comparison showing how the MI-, RI- or MVI-MFA configurations diverge from the true configuration was produced. Two approaches i.e., confidence ellipses and convex hulls, to visualize and assess the uncertainty due to missing values were also described. We showed how the areas of ellipses and convex hulls increased with the number of missing individuals. A free and easy-to-use code was proposed to implement the MI-MFA method in the R statistical environment. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that MI-MFA provides a useful and attractive method for estimating the coordinates of individuals on the first MFA components despite missing rows. MI-MFA configurations were close to the true configuration even when many individuals were missing in several data tables. This method takes into account the uncertainty of MI-MFA configurations induced by the missing rows, thereby allowing the reliability of the results to be evaluated.
Valentin Voillet, Philippe Besse, Laurence Liaubet, Magali San Cristobal, Ignacio González
BMC Bioinform.3