EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Bergner
dblp:187/6248
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 51% Image recognition and object detection · 25% Segmentation and scene understanding · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Token Cropr: Faster ViTs for Quite a Few Tasks · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
token pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Token Cropr: Faster ViTs for Quite a Few Tasks · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › visual recognition
high-resolution image recognition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Iterative Patch Selection for High-Resolution Image Recognition · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
patch selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Iterative Patch Selection for High-Resolution Image Recognition · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | 3D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical Imaging · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning › 3d representation learning
self-supervised 3d representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | 3D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical Imaging · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Token Cropr: Faster ViTs for Quite a Few Tasks · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Token Cropr: Faster ViTs for Quite a Few Tasks · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Token Cropr: Faster ViTs for Quite a Few Tasks · CVPR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | 3D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical Imaging · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
end-to-end token selection · 0.9auxiliary prediction heads · 0.9rotation prediction · 0.9jigsaw puzzle · 0.9exemplar networks · 0.9contrastive predictive coding · 0.9iterative patch selection · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Token Cropr: Faster ViTs for Quite a Few TasksabstractThe adoption of Vision Transformers (ViTs) in resource-constrained applications necessitates improvements in inference throughput. To this end several token pruning and merging approaches have been proposed that improve efficiency by successively reducing the number of tokens. However, it remains an open problem to design a token reduction method that is fast, maintains high performance, and is applicable to various vision tasks. In this work, we present a token pruner that uses auxiliary prediction heads that learn to select tokens end-to-end based on task relevance. These auxiliary heads can be removed after training, leading to throughput close to that of a random pruner. We evaluate our method on image classification, semantic segmentation, object detection, and instance segmentation, and show speedups of 1.5 – 4x with small drops in performance. As a best case, on the ADE20k semantic segmentation benchmark, we observe a 2x speedup relative to the no-pruning baseline, with a negligible performance penalty of 0.1 median mIoU across 5 seeds. Benjamin Bergner, Christoph Lippert, Aravindh Mahendran |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | Iterative Patch Selection for High-Resolution Image Recognition
Benjamin Bergner, Christoph Lippert, Aravindh Mahendran |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | 3D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical ImagingabstractSelf-supervised learning methods have witnessed a recent surge of interest after proving successful in multiple application fields. In this work, we leverage these techniques, and we propose 3D versions for five different self-supervised methods, in the form of proxy tasks. Our methods facilitate neural network feature learning from unlabeled 3D images, aiming to reduce the required cost for expert annotation. The developed algorithms are 3D Contrastive Predictive Coding, 3D Rotation prediction, 3D Jigsaw puzzles, Relative 3D patch location, and 3D Exemplar networks. Our experiments show that pretraining models with our 3D tasks yields more powerful semantic representations, and enables solving downstream tasks more accurately and efficiently, compared to training the models from scratch and to pretraining them on 2D slices. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods on three downstream tasks from the medical imaging domain: i) Brain Tumor Segmentation from 3D MRI, ii) Pancreas Tumor Segmentation from 3D CT, and iii) Diabetic Retinopathy Detection from 2D Fundus images. In each task, we assess the gains in data-efficiency, performance, and speed of convergence. Interestingly, we also find gains when transferring the learned representations, by our methods, from a large unlabeled 3D corpus to a small downstream-specific dataset. We achieve results competitive to state-of-the-art solutions at a fraction of the computational expense. We publish our implementations for the developed algorithms (both 3D and 2D versions) as an open-source library, in an effort to allow other researchers to apply and extend our methods on their datasets. Aiham Taleb, Winfried Lötzsch, Noel Danz, Julius Severin, Thomas Gärtner 0004, Benjamin Bergner, Christoph Lippert |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2019 | MORPHER - A Platform to Support Modeling of Outcome and Risk Prediction in Health ResearchabstractMachine learning is rapidly becoming a mainstay in research and industry. Particularly for clinical predictive modeling, these approaches are being increasingly applied, as evidenced by the growth in the number of related publications. While different computer tools exist that support rapid prototyping, we observe that the state of the art is lacking in the extent to which the needs of research clinicians are addressed. This leads to an increase in the time needed for development and validation of such models. In this paper, we outline the requirements and challenges inherent to this domain and present a platform for rapid prototyping tailored to the specific needs of clinical modeling for outcome and risk prediction. We argue that a move towards hybrid solutions, i.e., a mix of cloud and on-premise infrastructure, constitutes a viable way to reduce the time needed to develop and validate clinical predictive models in a standardized, reproducible fashion. Harry Freitas Da Cruz, Benjamin Bergner, Orhan Konak, Frederic Schneider, Philipp Bode, Conrad Lempert, Matthieu-P. Schapranow |
BIBE | 2 |