EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
John N. Zigman
dblp:187/7247
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1975-7308ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Memory systems · 58% Performance modeling and evaluation · 27% Storage systems · 15% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Runtime systems and virtual machines · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory systems › hybrid memory
hybrid memory management |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Unified Holistic Memory Management Supporting Multiple Big Data Processing Frameworks over Hybrid Memories · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021 Panthera: holistic memory management for big data processing over hybrid memories · PLDI 2019 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
benchmarking methodology |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Java Performance Analysis · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines
garbage collection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unified Holistic Memory Management Supporting Multiple Big Data Processing Frameworks over Hybrid Memories · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021 |
Storage systems › data management
data placement and migration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unified Holistic Memory Management Supporting Multiple Big Data Processing Frameworks over Hybrid Memories · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021 |
Memory systems
non-volatile memory |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unified Holistic Memory Management Supporting Multiple Big Data Processing Frameworks over Hybrid Memories · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2021 |
Memory systems › non-volatile memory
non-volatile memory management |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Panthera: holistic memory management for big data processing over hybrid memories · PLDI 2019 |
Memory systems
in-memory computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Panthera: holistic memory management for big data processing over hybrid memories · PLDI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workload analysis · 1.7profiling-guided optimization · 1.0access pattern analysis · 1.0memory management · 0.8garbage collection · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rethinking Java Performance AnalysisabstractRepresentative workloads and principled methodologies are the foundation of performance analysis, which in turn provides the empirical grounding for much of the innovation in systems research. However, benchmarks are hard to maintain, methodologies are hard to develop, and our field moves fast. The tension between our fast-moving fields and their need to maintain their methodological foundations is a serious challenge. This paper explores that challenge through the lens of Java performance analysis. Lessons we draw extend to other languages and other fields of computer science. Steve Blackburn, Zixian Cai, Xi Yang 0021, John N. Zigman |
ASPLOS (1) | 6 |
| 2021 | Unified Holistic Memory Management Supporting Multiple Big Data Processing Frameworks over Hybrid MemoriesabstractTo process real-world datasets, modern data-parallel systems often require extremely large amounts of memory, which are both costly and energy inefficient. Emerging non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies offer high capacity compared to DRAM and low energy compared to SSDs. Hence, NVMs have the potential to fundamentally change the dichotomy between DRAM and durable storage in Big Data processing. However, most Big Data applications are written in managed languages and executed on top of a managed runtime that already performs various dimensions of memory management. Supporting hybrid physical memories adds a new dimension, creating unique challenges in data replacement. This article proposes Panthera, a semantics-aware, fully automated memory management technique for Big Data processing over hybrid memories. Panthera analyzes user programs on a Big Data system to infer their coarse-grained access patterns, which are then passed to the Panthera runtime for efficient data placement and migration. For Big Data applications, the coarse-grained data division information is accurate enough to guide the GC for data layout, which hardly incurs overhead in data monitoring and moving. We implemented Panthera in OpenJDK and Apache Spark. Based on Big Data applications’ memory access pattern, we also implemented a new profiling-guided optimization strategy, which is transparent to applications. With this optimization, our extensive evaluation demonstrates that Panthera reduces energy by 32–53% at less than 1% time overhead on average. To show Panthera’s applicability, we extend it to QuickCached, a pure Java implementation of Memcached. Our evaluation results show that Panthera reduces energy by 28.7% at 5.2% time overhead on average. Chenxi Wang 0005, John N. Zigman, Haris Volos 0001, Onur Mutlu, Xiaobing Feng 0002, Guoqing Harry Xu, Huimin Cui |
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. | 5 |
| 2019 | Panthera: holistic memory management for big data processing over hybrid memoriesabstractModern data-parallel systems such as Spark rely increasingly on in-memory computing that can significantly improve the efficiency of iterative algorithms. To process real-world datasets, modern data-parallel systems often require extremely large amounts of memory, which are both costly and energy-inefficient. Emerging non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies offers high capacity compared to DRAM and low energy compared to SSDs. Hence, NVMs have the potential to fundamentally change the dichotomy between DRAM and durable storage in Big Data processing. However, most Big Data applications are written in managed languages (e.g., Scala and Java) and executed on top of a managed runtime (e.g., the Java Virtual Machine) that already performs various dimensions of memory management. Supporting hybrid physical memories adds in a new dimension, creating unique challenges in data replacement and migration. Chenxi Wang 0005, Huimin Cui, John N. Zigman, Haris Volos 0001, Onur Mutlu, Xiaobing Feng 0002, Guoqing Harry Xu |
PLDI | 4 |
| 2016 | Efficient Management for Hybrid Memory in Managed Language Runtime
Chenxi Wang 0005, John N. Zigman, Yunquan Zhang, Xiaobing Feng 0002 |
NPC | 3 |
| 2000 | Fast portable orthogonally persistent JavaabstractA powerful feature of the JavaTM programming language is its user-definable class loading policy, which when combined with the namespace independence between class loaders, allows portable implementation of semi-dynamic program transformations. Such transformations can be used for a range of purposes, including optimization and semantic extension. In this paper we present a framework for semantic extensions in Java. This framework consists of a number of simple but powerful transformations that, among other things, allow us to semantically extend Java to provide orthogonal persistence. The use of semi-dynamic program transformations lends our orthogonally persistent Java a number of important qualities, including simplicity, portability and a clean model of persistence. Significantly, our implementations are efficient and can outperform (in some cases) PJamaTM, a well-known orthogonally persistent Java, which is based on a modified virtual machine. In addition to describing the application of these transformations to orthogonally persistent Java, we foreshadow their use in a number of other contexts, including dynamic instance versioning and instrumentation. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Alonso Marquez, John N. Zigman, Steve Blackburn |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 2 |
| 1994 | Reducing data communication overhead for DOACROSS loop nestsabstractIf the iterations of a loop nest cannot be partitioned into independent tasks, data communication for data dependence is inevitable in order to execute them on parallel machines. This kind of loop nest is referred to as a DOACROSS loop nest. Peiyi Tang, John N. Zigman |
International Conference on Supercomputing | 2 |