Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joonas Jälkö
dblp:188/5963
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 1 first-author · 8 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
5 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 77% Security and privacy of machine learning · 11% Systems and software security · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 69% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 8% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
2.5 | 4 | 2025 | Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2025 Subsampling is not Magic: Why Large Batch Sizes Work for Differentially Private Stochastic Optimisation · ICML 2024 Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | On Consistent Bayesian Inference from Synthetic Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private bayesian inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy metrics
empirical privacy evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Consistent Bayesian Inference from Synthetic Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Subsampling is not Magic: Why Large Batch Sizes Work for Differentially Private Stochastic Optimisation · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Subsampling is not Magic: Why Large Batch Sizes Work for Differentially Private Stochastic Optimisation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
generalized linear model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential privacy · 2.7power-law analysis · 1.7posterior predictive sampling · 1.7gradient variance decomposition · 1.5batch size analysis · 1.5poisson regression · 1.0logistic regression · 1.0bayesian inference · 1.0rényi differential privacy · 0.8data subsampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Noise-Aware Differentially Private Variational InferenceabstractDifferential privacy (DP) provides robust privacy guarantees for statistical inference, but this can lead to unreliable results and biases in downstream applications. While several noise-aware approaches have been proposed which integrate DP perturbation into the inference, they are limited to specific types of simple probabilistic models. In this work, we propose a novel method for noise-aware approximate Bayesian inference based on stochastic gradient variational inference which can also be applied to high-dimensional and non-conjugate models. We also propose a more accurate evaluation method for noise-aware posteriors. Empirically, our inference method has similar performance to existing methods in the domain where they are applicable. Outside this domain, we obtain accurate coverages on high-dimensional Bayesian linear regression and well-calibrated predictive probabilities on Bayesian logistic regression with the UCI Adult dataset. Talal Alrawajfeh, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2025 | Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer LearningabstractMembership inference attacks (MIAs) are used to test practical privacy of machine learning models. MIAs complement formal guarantees from differential privacy (DP) under a more realistic adversary model. We analyse MIA vulnerability of fine-tuned neural networks both empirically and theoretically, the latter using a simplified model of fine-tuning. We show that the vulnerability of non-DP models when measured as the attacker advantage at a fixed false positive rate reduces according to a simple power law as the number of examples per class increases. A similar power-law applies even for the most vulnerable points, but the dataset size needed for adequate protection of the most vulnerable points is very large. Marlon Tobaben, Hibiki Ito, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2025 | On Consistent Bayesian Inference from Synthetic DataabstractGenerating synthetic data, with or without differential privacy, has attracted significant attention as a potential solution to the dilemma between making data easily available, and the privacy of data subjects. Several works have shown that consistency of downstream analyses from synthetic data, including accurate uncertainty estimation, requires accounting for the synthetic data generation. There are very few methods of doing so, most of them for frequentist analysis. In this paper, we study how to perform consistent Bayesian inference from synthetic data. We prove that mixing posterior samples obtained separately from multiple large synthetic data sets, that are sampled from a posterior predictive, converges to the posterior of the downstream analysis under standard regularity conditions when the analyst's model is compatible with the data provider's model. We also present several examples showing how the theory works in practice, and showing how Bayesian inference can fail when the compatibility assumption is not met, or the synthetic data set is not significantly larger than the original. Ossi Räisä, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2024 | Privacy-Aware Document Visual Question Answering
Rubèn Tito, Marlon Tobaben, Raouf Kerkouche, Mohamed Ali Souibgui, Kangsoo Jung, Joonas Jälkö, Vincent Poulain D'Andecy, Aurélie Joseph, Lei Kang 0002, Ernest Valveny, Antti Honkela, Mario Fritz, Dimosthenis Karatzas |
ICDAR (6) | 7 |
| 2024 | Subsampling is not Magic: Why Large Batch Sizes Work for Differentially Private Stochastic OptimisationabstractWe study how the batch size affects the total gradient variance in differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), seeking a theoretical explanation for the usefulness of large batch sizes. As DP-SGD is the basis of modern DP deep learning, its properties have been widely studied, and recent works have empirically found large batch sizes to be beneficial. However, theoretical explanations of this benefit are currently heuristic at best. We first observe that the total gradient variance in DP-SGD can be decomposed into subsampling-induced and noise-induced variances. We then prove that in the limit of an infinite number of iterations, the effective noise-induced variance is invariant to the batch size. The remaining subsampling-induced variance decreases with larger batch sizes, so large batches reduce the effective total gradient variance. We confirm numerically that the asymptotic regime is relevant in practical settings when the batch size is not small, and find that outside the asymptotic regime, the total gradient variance decreases even more with large batch sizes. We also find a sufficient condition that implies that large batch sizes similarly reduce effective DP noise variance for one iteration of DP-SGD. Ossi Räisä, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Noise-Aware Statistical Inference with Differentially Private Synthetic DataabstractWhile generation of synthetic data under differential privacy (DP) has received a lot of attention in the data privacy community, analysis of synthetic data has received much less. Existing work has shown that simply analysing DP synthetic data as if it were real does not produce valid inferences of population-level quantities. For example, confidence intervals become too narrow, which we demonstrate with a simple experiment. We tackle this problem by combining synthetic data analysis techniques from the field of multiple imputation (MI), and synthetic data generation using noise-aware (NA) Bayesian modeling into a pipeline NA+MI that allows computing accurate uncertainty estimates for population-level quantities from DP synthetic data. To implement NA+MI for discrete data generation using the values of marginal queries, we develop a novel noise-aware synthetic data generation algorithm NAPSU-MQ using the principle of maximum entropy. Our experiments demonstrate that the pipeline is able to produce accurate confidence intervals from DP synthetic data. The intervals become wider with tighter privacy to accurately capture the additional uncertainty stemming from DP noise. Ossi Räisä, Joonas Jälkö, Samuel Kaski, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTabstractWe propose a numerical accountant for evaluating the tight (ε,δ)-privacy loss for algorithms with discrete one dimensional output. The method is based on the privacy loss distribution formalism and it uses the recently introduced fast Fourier transform based accounting technique. We carry out an error analysis of the method in terms of moment bounds of the privacy loss distribution which leads to rigorous lower and upper bounds for the true (ε,δ)-values. As an application, we present a novel approach to accurate privacy accounting of the subsampled Gaussian mechanism. This completes the previously proposed analysis by giving strict lower and upper bounds for the privacy parameters. We demonstrate the performance of the accountant on the binomial mechanism and show that our approach allows decreasing noise variance up to 75 percent at equal privacy compared to existing bounds in the literature. We also illustrate how to compute tight bounds for the exponential mechanism applied to counting queries. Antti Koskela, Joonas Jälkö, Lukas Prediger, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | Differentially Private Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear ModelsabstractGeneralized linear models (GLMs) such as logistic regression are among the most widely used arms in data analyst’s repertoire and often used on sensitive datasets. A large body of prior works that investigate GLMs under differential privacy (DP) constraints provide only private point estimates of the regression coefficients, and are not able to quantify parameter uncertainty. In this work, with logistic and Poisson regression as running examples, we introduce a generic noise-aware DP Bayesian inference method for a GLM at hand, given a noisy sum of summary statistics. Quantifying uncertainty allows us to determine which of the regression coefficients are statistically significantly different from zero. We provide a previously unknown tight privacy analysis and experimentally demonstrate that the posteriors obtained from our model, while adhering to strong privacy guarantees, are close to the non-private posteriors. Tejas D. Kulkarni, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Koskela, Samuel Kaski, Antti Honkela |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Computing Tight Differential Privacy Guarantees Using FFTabstractDifferentially private (DP) machine learning has recently become popular. The privacy loss of DP algorithms is commonly reported using (e.d)-DP. In this paper, we propose a numerical accountant for evaluating the privacy loss for algorithms with continuous one dimensional output. This accountant can be applied to the subsampled multidimensional Gaussian mechanism which underlies the popular DP stochastic gradient descent. The proposed method is based on a numerical approximation of an integral formula which gives the exact (e.d)-values. The approximation is carried out by discretising the integral and by evaluating discrete convolutions using the fast Fourier transform algorithm. We give theoretical error bounds which show the convergence of the approximation and guarantee its accuracy to an arbitrary degree. We give both theoretical error bounds and numerical error estimates for the approximation. Experimental comparisons with state-of-the-art techniques demonstrate significant improvements in bound tightness and/or computation time. Antti Koskela, Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2019 | Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte CarloabstractRecent developments in differentially private (DP) machine learning and DP Bayesian learning have enabled learning under strong privacy guarantees for the training data subjects. In this paper, we further extend the applicability of DP Bayesian learning by presenting the first general DP Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm whose privacy-guarantees are not subject to unrealistic assumptions on Markov chain convergence and that is applicable to posterior inference in arbitrary models. Our algorithm is based on a decomposition of the Barker acceptance test that allows evaluating the Rényi DP privacy cost of the accept-reject choice. We further show how to improve the DP guarantee through data subsampling and approximate acceptance tests. Mikko A. Heikkilä, Joonas Jälkö, Onur Dikmen, Antti Honkela |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Differentially Private Variational Inference for Non-conjugate Models
Joonas Jälkö, Antti Honkela, Onur Dikmen |
UAI | 1 |