Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pranav Goel 0001
dblp:188/5967-1
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1037-2687ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% Language models and text generation · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Is Automated Topic Model Evaluation Broken? The Incoherence of Coherence · NeurIPS 2021 Improving Neural Topic Models using Knowledge Distillation · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
topic model evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Is Automated Topic Model Evaluation Broken? The Incoherence of Coherence · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
word ordering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Studying word order through iterative shuffling · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Measuring scalar constructs in social science with LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representations · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
constrained generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Studying word order through iterative shuffling · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Improving Neural Topic Models using Knowledge Distillation · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 2.4survey methodology · 1.7human judgment · 0.7meta-analysis · 0.5iterative shuffling · 0.5human evaluation · 0.5black-box language model inference · 0.5transformer · 0.4neural topic model · 0.4knowledge distillation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Measuring scalar constructs in social science with LLMsabstractHauke Licht, Rupak Sarkar, Patrick Y. Wu, Pranav Goel, Niklas Stoehr, Elliott Ash, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Hauke Licht, Rupak Sarkar, Patrick Y. Wu, Pranav Goel 0001, Niklas Stoehr, Elliott Ash, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2024 | Improving the TENOR of Labeling: Re-evaluating Topic Models for Content AnalysisabstractZongxia Li, Andrew Mao, Daniel Stephens, Pranav Goel, Emily Walpole, Alden Dima, Juan Fung, Jordan Boyd-Graber. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Zongxia Li, Andrew Mao, Daniel Kofi Stephens, Pranav Goel 0001, Emily Walpole, Alden Dima, Juan Fung, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
EACL (1) | 4 |
| 2023 | Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text RepresentationsabstractWhen people interpret text, they rely on inferences that go beyond the observed language itself.Inspired by this observation, we introduce a method for the analysis of text that takes implicitly communicated content explicitly into account.We use a large language model to produce sets of propositions that are inferentially related to the text that has been observed, then validate the plausibility of the generated content via human judgments.Incorporating these explicit representations of implicit content proves useful in multiple problem settings that involve the human interpretation of utterances: assessing the similarity of arguments, making sense of a body of opinion data, and modeling legislative behavior.Our results suggest that modeling the meanings behind observed language, rather than the literal text alone, is a valuable direction for NLP and particularly its applications to social science. 1 * Equal contribution. Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Rupak Sarkar, Pranav Goel 0001, Philip Resnik |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2021 | Studying word order through iterative shufflingabstractAs neural language models approach human performance on NLP benchmark tasks, their advances are widely seen as evidence of an increasingly complex understanding of syntax.This view rests upon a hypothesis that has not yet been empirically tested: that word order encodes meaning essential to performing these tasks.We refute this hypothesis in many cases: in the GLUE suite and in various genres of English text, the words in a sentence or phrase can rarely be permuted to form a phrase carrying substantially different information.Our surprising result relies on inference by iterative shuffling (IBIS), a novel, efficient procedure that finds the ordering of a bag of words having the highest likelihood under a fixed language model.IBIS can use any black-box model without additional training and is superior to existing word ordering algorithms.Coalescing our findings, we discuss how shuffling inference procedures such as IBIS can benefit language modeling and constrained generation. Nikolay Malkin, Sameera Lanka, Pranav Goel 0001, Nebojsa Jojic |
EMNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2021 | GPT Perdetry Test: Generating new meanings for new wordsabstractNikolay Malkin, Sameera Lanka, Pranav Goel, Sudha Rao, Nebojsa Jojic. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Nikolay Malkin, Sameera Lanka, Pranav Goel 0001, Sudha Rao, Nebojsa Jojic |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2021 | Is Automated Topic Model Evaluation Broken? The Incoherence of CoherenceabstractTopic model evaluation, like evaluation of other unsupervised methods, can be contentious. However, the field has coalesced around automated estimates of topic coherence, which rely on the frequency of word co-occurrences in a reference corpus. Contemporary neural topic models surpass classical ones according to these metrics. At the same time, topic model evaluation suffers from a validation gap: automated coherence, developed for classical models, has not been validated using human experimentation for neural models. In addition, a meta-analysis of topic modeling literature reveals a substantial standardization gap in automated topic modeling benchmarks. To address the validation gap, we compare automated coherence with the two most widely accepted human judgment tasks: topic rating and word intrusion. To address the standardization gap, we systematically evaluate a dominant classical model and two state-of-the-art neural models on two commonly used datasets. Automated evaluations declare a winning model when corresponding human evaluations do not, calling into question the validity of fully automatic evaluations independent of human judgments. Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Pranav Goel 0001, Andrew Hian-Cheong, Denis Peskov, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Philip Resnik |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Improving Neural Topic Models using Knowledge DistillationabstractTopic models are often used to identify humaninterpretable topics to help make sense of large document collections.We use knowledge distillation to combine the best attributes of probabilistic topic models and pretrained transformers.Our modular method can be straightforwardly applied with any neural topic model to improve topic quality, which we demonstrate using two models having disparate architectures, obtaining state-of-the-art topic coherence.We show that our adaptable framework not only improves performance in the aggregate over all estimated topics, as is commonly reported, but also in head-to-head comparisons of aligned topics. Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Pranav Goel 0001, Philip Resnik |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2018 | How emotional are you? Neural Architectures for Emotion Intensity Prediction in MicroblogsabstractSocial media based micro-blogging sites like Twitter have become a common source of real-time information (impacting organizations and their strategies, and are used for expressing emotions and opinions. Automated analysis of such content therefore rises in importance. To this end, we explore the viability of using deep neural networks on the specific task of emotion intensity prediction in tweets. We propose a neural architecture combining convolutional and fully connected layers in a non-sequential manner - done for the first time in context of natural language based tasks. Combined with lexicon-based features along with transfer learning, our model achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming the previous system by 0.044 or 4.4% Pearson correlation on the WASSA’17 EmoInt shared task dataset. We investigate the performance of deep multi-task learning models trained for all emotions at once in a unified architecture and get encouraging results. Experiments performed on evaluating correlation between emotion pairs offer interesting insights into the relationship between them. Devang Kulshreshtha, Pranav Goel 0001, Anil Kumar Singh 0001 |
COLING | 2 |
| 2018 | Sarcasm Target Identification: Dataset and An Introductory Approach
Aditya Joshi 0001, Pranav Goel 0001, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Mark J. Carman |
LREC | 2 |