Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lieke Gelderloos

dblp:188/6031 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Speech recognition and synthesis · 25% Language models and text generation · 19% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language acquisition
child-directed speech
0.412020
Learning to Understand Child-directed and Adult-directed Speech · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
reference resolution
0.412019
The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialogue · ACL (1) 2019
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal dialogue
visually grounded dialogue
0.412019
The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialogue · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech perception
0.312017
Representations of language in a model of visually grounded speech signal · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech representation learning
0.312017
Representations of language in a model of visually grounded speech signal · ACL (1) 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic speech · 0.4acoustic modeling · 0.4baseline reference resolution model · 0.4recurrent highway network · 0.3joint semantic space · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Learning to Understand Child-directed and Adult-directed Speech
abstract
Speech directed to children differs from adult-directed speech in linguistic aspects such as repetition, word choice, and sentence length, as well as in aspects of the speech signal itself, such as prosodic and phonemic variation. Human language acquisition research indicates that child-directed speech helps language learners. This study explores the effect of child-directed speech when learning to extract semantic information from speech directly. We compare the task performance of models trained on adult-directed speech (ADS) and child-directed speech (CDS). We find indications that CDS helps in the initial stages of learning, but eventually, models trained on ADS reach comparable task performance, and generalize better. The results suggest that this is at least partially due to linguistic rather than acoustic properties of the two registers, as we see the same pattern when looking at models trained on acoustically comparable synthetic speech.
Lieke Gelderloos, Grzegorz Chrupala, Afra Alishahi
ACL1
2020 Active Word Learning through Self-supervision
Lieke Gelderloos, Alireza Mahmoudi Kamelabad, Afra Alishahi
CogSci1
2019 The PhotoBook Dataset: Building Common Ground through Visually-Grounded Dialogue
abstract
This paper introduces the PhotoBook dataset, a large-scale collection of visually-grounded, task-oriented dialogues in English designed to investigate shared dialogue history accumulating during conversation.Taking inspiration from seminal work on dialogue analysis, we propose a data-collection task formulated as a collaborative game prompting two online participants to refer to images utilising both their visual context as well as previously established referring expressions.We provide a detailed description of the task setup and a thorough analysis of the 2,500 dialogues collected.To further illustrate the novel features of the dataset, we propose a baseline model for reference resolution which uses a simple method to take into account shared information accumulated in a reference chain.Our results show that this information is particularly important to resolve later descriptions and underline the need to develop more sophisticated models of common ground in dialogue interaction. 1
Janosch Haber, Tim Baumgärtner, Ece Takmaz, Lieke Gelderloos, Elia Bruni, Raquel Fernández
ACL (1)4
2019 Curious Topics: A Curiosity-Based Model of First Language Word Learning
Daan Keijser, Lieke Gelderloos, Afra Alishahi
CogSci2
2017 Representations of language in a model of visually grounded speech signal
abstract
We present a visually grounded model of speech perception which projects spoken utterances and images to a joint semantic space.We use a multi-layer recurrent highway network to model the temporal nature of spoken speech, and show that it learns to extract both form and meaningbased linguistic knowledge from the input signal.We carry out an in-depth analysis of the representations used by different components of the trained model and show that encoding of semantic aspects tends to become richer as we go up the hierarchy of layers, whereas encoding of formrelated aspects of the language input tends to initially increase and then plateau or decrease.
Grzegorz Chrupala, Lieke Gelderloos, Afra Alishahi
ACL (1)2
2016 From phonemes to images: levels of representation in a recurrent neural model of visually-grounded language learning
abstract
We present a model of visually-grounded language learning based on stacked gated recurrent neural networks which learns to predict visual features given an image description in the form of a sequence of phonemes. The learning task resembles that faced by human language learners who need to discover both structure and meaning from noisy and ambiguous data across modalities. We show that our model indeed learns to predict features of the visual context given phonetically transcribed image descriptions, and show that it represents linguistic information in a hierarchy of levels: lower layers in the stack are comparatively more sensitive to form, whereas higher layers are more sensitive to meaning.
Lieke Gelderloos, Grzegorz Chrupala
COLING1