Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Polina Zablotskaia

dblp:188/6903 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.222023
Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Do · NeurIPS 2023
"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classification · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
model debugging
1.222023
Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Do · NeurIPS 2023
"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classification · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › training data attribution
influence function
0.712023
Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Do · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution
0.612022
"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classification · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.612022
"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classification · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data · 1.1LSTM · 1.1BERT · 1.1influence functions · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Do
abstract
Influence functions (IF) have been seen as a technique for explaining model predictions through the lens of the training data. Their utility is assumed to be in identifying training examples "responsible" for a prediction so that, for example, correcting a prediction is possible by intervening on those examples (removing or editing them) and retraining the model. However, recent empirical studies have shown that the existing methods of estimating IF predict the leave-one-out-and-retrain effect poorly. In order to understand the mismatch between the theoretical promise and the practical results, we analyse five assumptions made by IF methods which are problematic for modern-scale deep neural networks and which concern convexity, numeric stability, training trajectory and parameter divergence. This allows us to clarify what can be expected theoretically from IF. We show that while most assumptions can be addressed successfully, the parameter divergence poses a clear limitation on the predictive power of IF: influence fades over training time even with deterministic training. We illustrate this theoretical result with BERT and ResNet models. Another conclusion from the theoretical analysis is that IF are still useful for model debugging and correcting even though some of the assumptions made in prior work do not hold: using natural language processing and computer vision tasks, we verify that mis-predictions can be successfully corrected by taking only a few fine-tuning steps on influential examples.
Andrea Schioppa, Katja Filippova, Ivan Titov 0001, Polina Zablotskaia
NeurIPS4
2022 Scaling Up Influence Functions
abstract
We address efficient calculation of influence functions for tracking predictions back to the training data. We propose and analyze a new approach to speeding up the inverse Hessian calculation based on Arnoldi iteration. With this improvement, we achieve, to the best of our knowledge, the first successful implementation of influence functions that scales to full-size (language and vision) Transformer models with several hundreds of millions of parameters. We evaluate our approach in image classification and sequence-to-sequence tasks with tens to a hundred of millions of training examples. Our code is available at https://github.com/google-research/jax-influence.
Andrea Schioppa, Polina Zablotskaia, David Vilar, Artem Sokolov 0001
AAAI2
2022 "Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classification
abstract
Feature attribution a.k.a.input salience methods which assign an importance score to a feature are abundant but may produce surprisingly different results for the same model on the same input.While differences are expected if disparate definitions of importance are assumed, most methods claim to provide faithful attributions and point at the features most relevant for a model's prediction.Existing work on faithfulness evaluation is not conclusive and does not provide a clear answer as to how different methods are to be compared.Focusing on text classification and the model debugging scenario, our main contribution is a protocol for faithfulness evaluation that makes use of partially synthetic data to obtain ground truth for feature importance ranking.Following the protocol, we do an in-depth analysis of four standard salience method classes on a range of datasets and lexical shortcuts for BERT and LSTM models.We demonstrate that some of the most popular method configurations provide poor results even for simple shortcuts while a method judged to be too simplistic works remarkably well for BERT.
Jasmijn Bastings, Sebastian Ebert, Polina Zablotskaia, Anders Sandholm 0001, Katja Filippova
EMNLP3
2021 PROVIDE: a probabilistic framework for unsupervised video decomposition
abstract
Unsupervised multi-object scene decomposition is a fast-emerging problem in representation learning. Despite significant progress in static scenes, such models are unable to leverage important dynamic cues present in videos. We propose PROVIDE, a novel unsupervised framework for PRObabilistic VIdeo DEcomposition based on a temporal extension of iterative inference. PROVIDE is powerful enough to jointly model complex individual multi-object representations and explicit temporal dependencies between latent variables across frames. This is achieved by leveraging 2D-LSTM, temporally conditioned inference and generation within the iterative amortized inference for posterior refinement. Our method improves the overall quality of decompositions, encodes information about the objects’ dynamics, and can be used to predict trajectories of each object separately. Additionally, we show that our model has a high accuracy even without color information. We demonstrate the decomposition capabilities of our model and show that it outperforms the state-of-the-art on several benchmark datasets, one of which was curated for this work and will be made publicly available.
Polina Zablotskaia, Edoardo A. Dominici, Leonid Sigal, Andreas M. Lehrmann
UAI1
2019 DwNet: Dense warp-based network for pose-guided human video generation
Polina Zablotskaia, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Leonid Sigal
BMVC1
2016 On Impact of Weather on Human Mobility in Cities
Jun Pang 0001, Polina Zablotskaia, Yang Zhang 0016
WISE (2)2