Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John McDonagh
dblp:188/7463
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Face, body and person analysis · 88% Image recognition and object detection · 12% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face alignment |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | AnimalWeb: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Dataset of Annotated Animal Faces · CVPR 2020 Synergy between Face Alignment and Tracking via Discriminative Global Consensus Optimization · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face tracking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Synergy between Face Alignment and Tracking via Discriminative Global Consensus Optimization · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | AnimalWeb: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Dataset of Annotated Animal Faces · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
landmark annotation · 0.4global variable consensus optimization · 0.3deep features · 0.3cascaded regression · 0.3ADMM · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | AnimalWeb: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Dataset of Annotated Animal FacesabstractSeveral studies show that animal needs are often expressed through their faces. Though remarkable progress has been made towards the automatic understanding of human faces, this has not been the case with animal faces. There exists significant room for algorithmic advances that could realize automatic systems for interpreting animal faces. Besides scientific value, resulting technology will foster better and cheaper animal care. We believe the underlying research progress is mainly obstructed by the lack of an adequately annotated dataset of animal faces, covering a wide spectrum of animal species. To this end, we introduce a large-scale, hierarchical annotated dataset of animal faces, featuring 22.4K faces from 350 diverse species and 21 animal orders across biological taxonomy. These faces are captured `in-the-wild' conditions and are consistently annotated with 9 landmarks on key facial features. The dataset is structured and scalable by design; its development underwent four systematic stages involving rigorous, overall effort of over 6K man-hours. We benchmark it for face alignment using the existing art under two new problem settings. Results showcase its challenging nature, unique attributes and present definite prospects for novel, adaptive, and generalized face-oriented CV algorithms. Further benchmarking the dataset across face detection and fine-grained recognition tasks demonstrates its multi-task applications and room for improvement. The dataset is available at: https://fdmaproject.wordpress.com/. Muhammad Haris Khan, John McDonagh, Salman Khan 0001, Muhammad Shahabuddin, Aditya Arora, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Ling Shao 0001, Georgios Tzimiropoulos |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2017 | Synergy between Face Alignment and Tracking via Discriminative Global Consensus OptimizationabstractAn open question in facial landmark localization in video is whether one should perform tracking or tracking-by-detection (i.e. face alignment). Tracking produces fittings of high accuracy but is prone to drifting. Tracking-by-detection is drift-free but results in low accuracy fittings. To provide a solution to this problem, we describe the very first, to the best of our knowledge, synergistic approach between detection (face alignment) and tracking which completely eliminates drifting from face tracking, and does not merely perform tracking-by-detection. Our first main contribution is to show that one can achieve this synergy between detection and tracking using a principled optimization framework based on the theory of Global Variable Consensus Optimization using ADMM; Our second contribution is to show how the proposed analytic framework can be integrated within state-of-the-art discriminative methods for face alignment and tracking based on cascaded regression and deeply learned features. Overall, we call our method Discriminative Global Consensus Model (DGCM). Our third contribution is to show that DGCM achieves large performance improvement over the currently best performing face tracking methods on the most challenging category of the 300-VW dataset. Muhammad Haris Khan, John McDonagh, Georgios Tzimiropoulos |
ICCV | 2 |