Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Chao Wang 0103

dblp:188/7759-103 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-5721-5221ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 50% Vision and language · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Information Theoretic Text-to-Image Alignment · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › image-text alignment
text-to-image alignment
0.912025
Information Theoretic Text-to-Image Alignment · ICLR 2025
Network measurement and analytics › traffic classification
deep learning-based traffic classification
0.712023
Replication: Contrastive Learning and Data Augmentation in Traffic Classification Using a Flowpic Input Representation · IMC 2023
Network measurement and analytics › traffic classification
few-shot traffic classification
0.712023
Replication: Contrastive Learning and Data Augmentation in Traffic Classification Using a Flowpic Input Representation · IMC 2023
Network measurement and analytics
traffic classification
0.712023
Replication: Contrastive Learning and Data Augmentation in Traffic Classification Using a Flowpic Input Representation · IMC 2023
Information theory › information measures › mutual information
mutual information estimation
0.312025
Information Theoretic Text-to-Image Alignment · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised fine-tuning · 1.7mutual information estimation · 1.7self-supervised learning · 0.7few-shot learning · 0.7data augmentation · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Information Theoretic Text-to-Image Alignment
abstract
Diffusion models for Text-to-Image (T2I) conditional generation have recently achieved tremendous success. Yet, aligning these models with user’s intentions still involves a laborious trial-and-error process, and this challenging alignment problem has attracted considerable attention from the research community. In this work, instead of relying on fine-grained linguistic analyses of prompts, human annotation, or auxiliary vision-language models, we use Mutual Information (MI) to guide model alignment. In brief, our method uses self-supervised fine-tuning and relies on a point-wise MI estimation between prompts and images to create a synthetic fine-tuning set for improving model alignment. Our analysis indicates that our method is superior to the state-of-the-art, yet it only requires the pre-trained denoising network of the T2I model itself to estimate MI, and a simple fine-tuning strategy that improves alignment while maintaining image quality. Code available at https://github.com/Chao0511/mitune.
Chao Wang 0103, Giulio Franzese, Alessandro Finamore, Massimo Gallo, Pietro Michiardi
ICLR1
2024 Data Augmentation for Traffic Classification
Chao Wang 0103, Alessandro Finamore, Pietro Michiardi, Massimo Gallo, Dario Rossi 0001
PAM (1)1
2023 Replication: Contrastive Learning and Data Augmentation in Traffic Classification Using a Flowpic Input Representation
abstract
Over the last years we witnessed a renewed interest toward Traffic Classification (TC) captivated by the rise of Deep Learning (DL). Yet, the vast majority of TC literature lacks code artifacts, performance assessments across datasets and reference comparisons against Machine Learning (ML) methods. Among those works, a recent study from IMC'22 [16] is worth of attention since it adopts recent DL methodologies (namely, few-shot learning, self-supervision via contrastive learning and data augmentation) appealing for networking as they enable to learn from a few samples and transfer across datasets. The main result of [16] on the UCDAVIS, ISCXVPN and ISCXTOR datasets is that, with such DL methodologies, 100 input samples are enough to achieve very high accuracy using an input representation called "flowpic'' (i.e., a per-flow 2d histograms of the packets size evolution over time).
Alessandro Finamore, Chao Wang 0103, Jonatan Krolikowski, José Manuel Navarro, Fuxing Chen, Dario Rossi 0001
IMC2