Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Omar Sagga
dblp:189/1708
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5554-027XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 57% Network security · 43% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Routing and switching · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
inter-domain routing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | MaxLength Considered Harmful to the RPKI · CoNEXT 2017 |
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › inter-domain routing security
RPKI |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | MaxLength Considered Harmful to the RPKI · CoNEXT 2017 |
Network security
routing security |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | MaxLength Considered Harmful to the RPKI · CoNEXT 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
network measurement · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Efficient Noninteractive Certification of RSA Moduli and Beyond
Sharon Goldberg, Leonid Reyzin, Omar Sagga, Foteini Baldimtsi |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 3 |
| 2017 | MaxLength Considered Harmful to the RPKIabstractUser convenience and strong security are often at odds, and most security applications need to find some sort of balance between these two (often opposing) goals. The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), a security infrastructure built on top of interdomain routing, is not immune to this issue. The RPKI uses the maxLength attribute to reduce the amount of information that must be explicitly recorded in its cryptographic objects. MaxLength also allows operators to easily reconfigure their networks without modifying their RPKI objects. Our network measurements, however, suggest that the maxLength attribute strikes the wrong balance between security and user convenience. We therefore believe that operators should avoid using maxLength. We give operational recommendations and develop software that allow operators to reap many of the benefits of maxLength without its security costs. Yossi Gilad, Omar Sagga, Sharon Goldberg |
CoNEXT | 2 |