Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jishnu Mukhoti
dblp:189/7833
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Segmentation and scene understanding · 20% Vision and language · 10% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
open-vocabulary segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
focal loss |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
spectral normalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learning · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral normalization · 0.7residual connections · 0.7gaussian discriminant analysis · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7CLIP · 0.7temperature scaling · 0.4focal loss · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple BaselineabstractReliable uncertainty from deterministic single-forward pass models is sought after because conventional methods of uncertainty quantification are computationally expensive. We take two complex single-forward-pass uncertainty approaches, DUQ and SNGP, and examine whether they mainly rely on a well-regularized feature space. Crucially, without using their more complex methods for estimating uncertainty, we find that a single softmax neural net with such a regularized feature-space, achieved via residual connections and spectral normalization, outperforms DUQ and SNGP's epistemic uncertainty predictions using simple Gaussian Discriminant Analysis post-training as a separate feature-space density estimator-without fine-tuning on OoD data, feature ensembling, or input pre-procressing. Our conceptually simple Deep Deterministic Uncertainty (DDU) baseline can also be used to disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty and performs as well as Deep Ensembles, the state-of-the art for uncertainty prediction, on several OoD bench-marks (CIFAR-10/100 vs SVHN/Tiny-ImageNet, ImageNet vs ImageNet-O), active learning settings across different model architectures, as well as in large scale vision tasks like semantic segmentation, while being computationally cheaper. Jishnu Mukhoti, Andreas Kirsch 0002, Joost van Amersfoort, Philip Torr 0001, Yarin Gal |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive LearningabstractWe introduce Patch Aligned Contrastive Learning (PACL), a modified compatibility function for CLIP's contrastive loss, intending to train an alignment between the patch tokens of the vision encoder and the CLS token of the text encoder. With such an alignment, a model can identify regions of an image corresponding to a given text input, and therefore transfer seamlessly to the task of open vocabulary semantic segmentation without requiring any segmentation annotations during training. Using pre-trained CLIP encoders with PACL, we are able to set the state-of-the-art on the task of open vocabulary zero-shot segmentation on 4 different segmentation benchmarks: Pascal VOC, Pascal Context, COCO Stuff and ADE20K. Furthermore, we show that PACL is also applicable to image-level predictions and when used with a CLIP backbone, provides a general improvement in zero-shot classification accuracy compared to CLIP, across a suite of 12 image classification datasets. Jishnu Mukhoti, Tsung-Yu Lin, Omid Poursaeed, Rui Wang 0043, Ashish Shah, Philip Torr 0001, Ser-Nam Lim |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal LossabstractMiscalibration -- a mismatch between a model's confidence and its correctness -- of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) makes their predictions hard to rely on. Ideally, we want networks to be accurate, calibrated and confident. We show that, as opposed to the standard cross-entropy loss, focal loss (Lin et al., 2017) allows us to learn models that are already very well calibrated. When combined with temperature scaling, whilst preserving accuracy, it yields state-of-the-art calibrated models. We provide a thorough analysis of the factors causing miscalibration, and use the insights we glean from this to justify the empirically excellent performance of focal loss. To facilitate the use of focal loss in practice, we also provide a principled approach to automatically select the hyperparameter involved in the loss function. We perform extensive experiments on a variety of computer vision and NLP datasets, and with a wide variety of network architectures, and show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art calibration without compromising on accuracy in almost all cases. Code is available at https://github.com/torrvision/focal_calibration. Jishnu Mukhoti, Viveka Kulharia, Amartya Sanyal, Stuart Golodetz, Philip Torr 0001, Puneet K. Dokania |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Let's Take This Online: Adapting Scene Coordinate Regression Network Predictions for Online RGB-D Camera RelocalisationabstractMany applications require a camera to be relocalised online, without expensive offline training on the target scene. Whilst both keyframe and sparse keypoint matching methods can be used online, the former often fail away from the training trajectory, and the latter can struggle in textureless regions. By contrast, scene coordinate regression (SCoRe) methods generalise to novel poses and can leverage dense correspondences to improve robustness, and recent work has shown how to adapt SCoRe forests between scenes, allowing their state-of-the-art performance to be leveraged online. However, because they use features hand-crafted for indoor use, they do not generalise well to harder outdoor scenes. Whilst replacing the forest with a neural network and learning suitable features for outdoor use is possible, the techniques used to adapt forests between scenes are unfortunately harder to transfer to a network context. In this paper, we address this by proposing a novel way of leveraging a network trained on one scene to predict points in another scene. Our approach replaces the appearance clustering performed by the branching structure of a regression forest with a two-step process that first uses the network to predict points in the original scene, and then uses these predicted points to look up clusters of points from the new scene. We show experimentally that our online approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on both the 7-Scenes and Cambridge Landmarks datasets, whilst running in under 300ms, making it highly effective in live scenarios. Tommaso Cavallari, Luca Bertinetto, Jishnu Mukhoti, Philip Torr 0001, Stuart Golodetz |
3DV | 3 |
| 2016 | Knowledge extraction from a time-series using segmentation, fuzzy matching and predictor graphsabstractIn this paper, a novel multi-stage approach to knowledge extraction from a time-series is proposed. A given time-series is modeled as a sequence of well-known primitive patterns with the purpose of identifying first-order probabilistic transition rules for prediction. The first stage of the proposed model segments a time-series into structurally distinct temporal blocks of non-uniform length such that each block possesses a relatively low variation of dynamic slope. In the second stage, the temporal segments thus obtained are normalized and matched with one of four well-known primitive patterns using a fuzzy matching algorithm. Finally, the sequence of matched segments is used to represent the time-series as a set of four directed graphs corresponding to the four primitive patterns. Each vertex in the graphs represents a horizontal partition of the time-series and each directed edge indicates the transitions between two such partitions caused by the occurrence of one or more temporal segments. In the test phase, the graphs are employed to predict possible future values of the time-series. Experiments carried out on the TAIEX close-price time-series indicate a high prediction accuracy, thereby validating the use of the model for real-life forecasting applications. Jishnu Mukhoti, Pratyusha Rakshit, Diptendu Bhattacharya, Amit Konar, Atulya K. Nagar |
FUZZ-IEEE | 1 |