Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aukosh Jagannath

dblp:19/10670 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
0as first author
11since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 10 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Learning theory · 31% Graph learning · 27% Deep learning architectures and training · 15%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Computational complexity · 61% Mathematical optimization · 37% Computational geometry · 2%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 41, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
2.332026
Universality of high-dimensional scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (extended abstract) · COLT 2026
High-dimensional SGD aligns with emerging outlier eigenspaces · ICLR 2024
Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
2.032023
Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023
Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional asymptotics
1.622026
Universality of high-dimensional scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (extended abstract) · COLT 2026
High-dimensional limit theorems for SGD: Effective dynamics and critical scaling · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
1.322023
Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
1.222024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Low-Degree Hardness of Random Optimization Problems · FOCS 2020
Computational complexity › average-case complexity
overlap gap property
1.222024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Low-Degree Hardness of Random Optimization Problems · FOCS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolution
1.222023
Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks · ICLR 2023
Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
1.122026
High-dimensional SGD aligns with emerging outlier eigenspaces · ICLR 2024
Universality of high-dimensional scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (extended abstract) · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical physics of learning
mean-field analysis
1.012026
Universality of high-dimensional scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (extended abstract) · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
1.012026
Universality of high-dimensional scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (extended abstract) · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
Provable Benefits of Unsupervised Pre-training and Transfer Learning via Single-Index Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
unsupervised pre-training
0.912025
Provable Benefits of Unsupervised Pre-training and Transfer Learning via Single-Index Models · ICML 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.912025
Differentially Private Multivariate Medians · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private statistical estimation
0.912025
Differentially Private Multivariate Medians · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
hessian spectrum analysis
0.812024
High-dimensional SGD aligns with emerging outlier eigenspaces · ICLR 2024
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.812024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
constant-depth circuits
0.812024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Computational complexity › hardness of approximation
low-degree hardness
0.812024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Mathematical optimization
randomized optimization
0.812024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Mathematical optimization
spin glass
0.812024
Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics · SIAM J. Comput. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › bayesian learning theory
bayes optimality
0.712023
Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › attention-based graph neural network
graph attention network
0.712023
Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multilayer neural network
0.712023
Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Graph Attention Retrospective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
stochastic gradient descent
0.612022
High-dimensional limit theorems for SGD: Effective dynamics and critical scaling · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.612022
High-dimensional limit theorems for SGD: Effective dynamics and critical scaling · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › statistical consistency
estimator consistency
0.512021
Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
high-dimensional inference
0.512021
Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
0.512021
Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised classification
0.512021
Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 2.1stochastic differential equation · 1.6ordinary differential equation · 1.6stochastic block model · 1.2graph convolution · 1.2gaussian mixture model · 1.0single-index model · 0.9exponential mechanism · 0.9concentration inequalities · 0.9spectral analysis · 0.8low-degree polynomial method · 0.8langevin dynamics · 0.8hypercontractivity · 0.8gaussian analysis · 0.8boolean analysis · 0.8over-squashing analysis · 0.7convolution · 0.7stochastic differential equations · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Universality of high-dimensional scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (extended abstract)
abstract
We consider statistical tasks in high dimensions whose loss depends on the data only through its projection into a fixed-dimensional subspace spanned by the parameter vectors and certain ground truth vectors. This includes classifying mixture distributions with cross-entropy loss with one and two-layer networks, and learning single and multi-index models with one and two-layer networks. When the data is drawn from an isotropic Gaussian mixture distribution, it is known that the evolution of a finite family of summary statistics under stochastic gradient descent converges to an autonomous ordinary differential equation (ODE), as the dimension and sample size go to $\infty$ and the step size goes to $0$ commensurately. Our main result is that these ODE limits are universal in that this limit is the same whenever the data is drawn from mixtures of arbitrary product distributions whose first two moments match the corresponding Gaussian distribution, provided the initialization and ground truth vectors are coordinate-delocalized. We complement this by proving two corresponding non-universality results. We provide a simple example where the ODE limits are non-universal if the initialization is coordinate aligned. We also show that the stochastic differential equation limits arising as fluctuations of the summary statistics around their ODE’s fixed points are not universal.
Reza Gheissari, Aukosh Jagannath
COLT2
2025 Provable Benefits of Unsupervised Pre-training and Transfer Learning via Single-Index Models
abstract
Unsupervised pre-training and transfer learning are commonly used techniques to initialize training algorithms for neural networks, particularly in settings with limited labeled data. In this paper, we study the effects of unsupervised pre-training and transfer learning on the sample complexity of high-dimensional supervised learning. Specifically, we consider the problem of training a single-layer neural network via online stochastic gradient descent. We establish that pre-training and transfer learning (under concept shift) reduce sample complexity by polynomial factors (in the dimension) under very general assumptions. We also uncover some surprising settings where pre-training grants exponential improvement over random initialization in terms of sample complexity.
Taj Jones-McCormick, Aukosh Jagannath, Subhabrata Sen
ICML2
2025 Differentially Private Multivariate Medians
abstract
Statistical tools which satisfy rigorous privacy guarantees are necessary for modern data analysis. It is well-known that robustness against contamination is linked to differential privacy. Despite this fact, using multivariate medians for differentially private and robust multivariate location estimation has not been systematically studied. We develop novel finite-sample performance guarantees for differentially private multivariate depth-based medians, which are essentially sharp. Our results cover commonly used depth functions, such as the halfspace (or Tukey) depth, spatial depth, and the integrated dual depth. We show that under Cauchy marginals, the cost of heavy-tailed location estimation outweighs the cost of privacy. We demonstrate our results numerically using a Gaussian contamination model in dimensions up to d = 100, and compare them to a state-of-the-art private mean estimation algorithm. As a by-product of our investigation, we prove concentration inequalities for the output of the exponential mechanism about the maximizer of the population objective function. This bound applies to objective functions that satisfy a mild regularity condition.
Kelly Ramsay, Aukosh Jagannath, Shoja'eddin Chenouri
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2024 High-dimensional SGD aligns with emerging outlier eigenspaces
abstract
We rigorously study the joint evolution of training dynamics via stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and the spectra of empirical Hessian and gradient matrices. We prove that in two canonical classification tasks for multi-class high-dimensional mixtures and either 1 or 2-layer neural networks, the SGD trajectory rapidly aligns with emerging low-rank outlier eigenspaces of the Hessian and gradient matrices. Moreover, in multi-layer settings this alignment occurs per layer, with the final layer's outlier eigenspace evolving over the course of training, and exhibiting rank deficiency when the SGD converges to sub-optimal classifiers. This establishes some of the rich predictions that have arisen from extensive numerical studies in the last decade about the spectra of Hessian and information matrices over the course of training in overparametrized networks.
Gérard Ben Arous, Reza Gheissari, Jiaoyang Huang, Aukosh Jagannath
ICLR4
2024 Hardness of Random Optimization Problems for Boolean Circuits, Low-Degree Polynomials, and Langevin Dynamics
abstract
Abstract. We consider the problem of finding nearly optimal solutions of optimization problems with random objective functions. Such problems arise widely in the theory of random graphs, theoretical computer science, and statistical physics. Two concrete problems we consider are (a) optimizing the Hamiltonian of a spherical or Ising [Formula: see text]-spin glass model and (b) finding a large independent set in a sparse Erdős–Rényi graph. The following families of algorithms are considered: (a) low-degree polynomials of the input—a general framework that captures many prior algorithms; (b) low-depth Boolean circuits; (c) the Langevin dynamics algorithm, a canonical Monte Carlo analogue of the gradient descent algorithm. We show that these families of algorithms cannot have high success probability. For the case of Boolean circuits, our results improve the state-of-the-art bounds known in circuit complexity theory (although we consider the search problem as opposed to the decision problem). Our proof uses the fact that these models are known to exhibit a variant of the overlap gap property (OGP) of near-optimal solutions. Specifically, for both models, every two solutions whose objectives are above a certain threshold are either close to or far from each other. The crux of our proof is that the classes of algorithms we consider exhibit a form of stability (noise-insensitivity): a small perturbation of the input induces a small perturbation of the output. We show by an interpolation argument that stable algorithms cannot overcome the OGP barrier. The stability of Langevin dynamics is an immediate consequence of the well-posedness of stochastic differential equations. The stability of low-degree polynomials and Boolean circuits is established using tools from Gaussian and Boolean analysis—namely hypercontractivity and total influence, as well as a novel lower bound for random walks avoiding certain subsets, which we expect to be of independent interest. In the case of Boolean circuits, the result also makes use of Linial–Mansour–Nisan’s classical theorem. Our techniques apply more broadly to low influence functions, and we expect that they may apply more generally.
David Gamarnik, Aukosh Jagannath, Alexander S. Wein
SIAM J. Comput.2
2023 Effects of Graph Convolutions in Multi-layer Networks
Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis, Aukosh Jagannath
ICLR3
2023 Optimality of Message-Passing Architectures for Sparse Graphs
abstract
We study the node classification problem on feature-decorated graphs in the sparse setting, i.e., when the expected degree of a node is $O(1)$ in the number of nodes, in the fixed-dimensional asymptotic regime, i.e., the dimension of the feature data is fixed while the number of nodes is large. Such graphs are typically known to be locally tree-like. We introduce a notion of Bayes optimality for node classification tasks, called asymptotic local Bayes optimality, and compute the optimal classifier according to this criterion for a fairly general statistical data model with arbitrary distributions of the node features and edge connectivity. The optimal classifier is implementable using a message-passing graph neural network architecture. We then compute the generalization error of this classifier and compare its performance against existing learning methods theoretically on a well-studied statistical model with naturally identifiable signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in the data. We find that the optimal message-passing architecture interpolates between a standard MLP in the regime of low graph signal and a typical convolution in the regime of high graph signal. Furthermore, we prove a corresponding non-asymptotic result.
Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis, Aukosh Jagannath
NeurIPS3
2023 Graph Attention Retrospective
abstract
Graph-based learning is a rapidly growing sub-field of machine learning with applications in social networks, citation networks, and bioinformatics. One of the most popular models is graph attention networks. They were introduced to allow a node to aggregate information from features of neighbor nodes in a non-uniform way, in contrast to simple graph convolution which does not distinguish the neighbors of a node. In this paper, we theoretically study the behaviour of graph attention networks. We prove multiple results on the performance of the graph attention mechanism for the problem of node classification for a contextual stochastic block model. Here, the node features are obtained from a mixture of Gaussians and the edges from a stochastic block model. We show that in an "easy" regime, where the distance between the means of the Gaussians is large enough, graph attention is able to distinguish inter-class from intra-class edges. Thus it maintains the weights of important edges and significantly reduces the weights of unimportant edges. Consequently, we show that this implies perfect node classification. In the "hard" regime, we show that every attention mechanism fails to distinguish intra-class from inter-class edges. In addition, we show that graph attention convolution cannot (almost) perfectly classify the nodes even if intra-class edges could be separated from inter-class edges. Beyond perfect node classification, we provide a positive result on graph attention's robustness against structural noise in the graph. In particular, our robustness result implies that graph attention can be strictly better than both the simple graph convolution and the best linear classifier of node features. We evaluate our theoretical results on synthetic and real-world data.
Kimon Fountoulakis, Amit Levi 0001, Shenghao Yang 0002, Aseem Baranwal, Aukosh Jagannath
J. Mach. Learn. Res.5
2022 High-dimensional limit theorems for SGD: Effective dynamics and critical scaling
abstract
We study the scaling limits of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with constant step-size in the high-dimensional regime. We prove limit theorems for the trajectories of summary statistics (i.e., finite-dimensional functions) of SGD as the dimension goes to infinity. Our approach allows one to choose the summary statistics that are tracked, the initialization, and the step-size. It yields both ballistic (ODE) and diffusive (SDE) limits, with the limit depending dramatically on the former choices. We find a critical scaling regime for the step-size below which this ``effective dynamics" matches gradient flow for the population loss, but at which, a new correction term appears which changes the phase diagram. About the fixed points of this effective dynamics, the corresponding diffusive limits can be quite complex and even degenerate. We demonstrate our approach on popular examples including estimation for spiked matrix and tensor models and classification via two-layer networks for binary and XOR-type Gaussian mixture models. These examples exhibit surprising phenomena including multimodal timescales to convergence as well as convergence to sub-optimal solutions with probability bounded away from zero from random (e.g., Gaussian) initializations.
Gérard Ben Arous, Reza Gheissari, Aukosh Jagannath
NeurIPS3
2021 Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalization
abstract
Recently there has been increased interest in semi-supervised classification in the presence of graphical information. A new class of learning models has emerged that relies, at its most basic level, on classifying the data after first applying a graph convolution. To understand the merits of this approach, we study the classification of a mixture of Gaussians, where the data corresponds to the node attributes of a stochastic block model. We show that graph convolution extends the regime in which the data is linearly separable by a factor of roughly $1/\sqrt{D}$, where $D$ is the expected degree of a node, as compared to the mixture model data on its own. Furthermore, we find that the linear classifier obtained by minimizing the cross-entropy loss after the graph convolution generalizes to out-of-distribution data where the unseen data can have different intra- and inter-class edge probabilities from the training data.
Aseem Baranwal, Kimon Fountoulakis, Aukosh Jagannath
ICML3
2021 Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inference
abstract
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is a popular algorithm for optimization problems arising in high-dimensional inference tasks. Here one produces an estimator of an unknown parameter from independent samples of data by iteratively optimizing a loss function. This loss function is random and often non-convex. We study the performance of the simplest version of SGD, namely online SGD, from a random start in the setting where the parameter space is high-dimensional. We develop nearly sharp thresholds for the number of samples needed for consistent estimation as one varies the dimension. Our thresholds depend only on an intrinsic property of the population loss which we call the information exponent. In particular, our results do not assume uniform control on the loss itself, such as convexity or uniform derivative bounds. The thresholds we obtain are polynomial in the dimension and the precise exponent depends explicitly on the information exponent. As a consequence of our results, we find that except for the simplest tasks, almost all of the data is used simply in the initial search phase to obtain non-trivial correlation with the ground truth. Upon attaining non-trivial correlation, the descent is rapid and exhibits law of large numbers type behavior. We illustrate our approach by applying it to a wide set of inference tasks such as phase retrieval, and parameter estimation for generalized linear models, online PCA, and spiked tensor models, as well as to supervised learning for single-layer networks with general activation functions.
Gérard Ben Arous, Reza Gheissari, Aukosh Jagannath
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2020 Low-Degree Hardness of Random Optimization Problems
abstract
We consider the problem of finding nearly optimal solutions of optimization problems with random objective functions. Such problems arise widely in the theory of random graphs, theoretical computer science, and statistical physics. Two concrete problems we consider are (a) optimizing the Hamiltonian of a spherical or Ising p-spin glass model, and (b) finding a large independent set in a sparse Erdos-Renyi graph. Two families of algorithms are considered: (a) low-degree polynomials of the input-a general framework that captures methods such as approximate message passing and local algorithms on sparse graphs, among others; and (b) the Langevin dynamics algorithm, a canonical Monte Carlo analogue of the gradient descent algorithm (applicable only for the spherical p-spin glass Hamiltonian). We show that neither family of algorithms can produce nearly optimal solutions with high probability. Our proof uses the fact that both models are known to exhibit a variant of the overlap gap property (OGP) of near-optimal solutions. Specifically, for both models, every two solutions whose objective values are above a certain threshold are either close or far from each other. The crux of our proof is the stability of both algorithms: a small perturbation of the input induces a small perturbation of the output. By an interpolation argument, such a stable algorithm cannot overcome the OGP barrier. The stability of the Langevin dynamics is an immediate consequence of the well-posedness of stochastic differential equations. The stability of low-degree polynomials is established using concepts from Gaussian and Boolean Fourier analysis, including noise sensitivity, hypercontractivity, and total influence.
David Gamarnik, Aukosh Jagannath, Alexander S. Wein
FOCS2
2013 Solution of the Propeller Conjecture in ℝ3
Steven Heilman, Aukosh Jagannath, Assaf Naor
Discret. Comput. Geom.2
2012 Solution of the propeller conjecture in R3
abstract
It is shown that every measurable partition {A1,..., Ak} of R3 satisfies: ∑i=1k|intAi xe-1/2|x|22dx|22≤ 9π2. Let P1,P2,P3 be the partition of R2 into 120o sectors centered at the origin. The bound (1) is sharp, with equality holding if Ai=Pi x R for i∈ {1,2,3} and Ai=∅ for i∈ {4,...,k}. This settles positively the 3-dimensional Propeller Conjecture of Khot and Naor (FOCS 2008). The proof of (1) reduces the problem to a finite set of numerical inequalities which are then verified with full rigor in a computer-assisted fashion. The main consequence (and motivation) of (1) is complexity-theoretic: the Unique Games hardness threshold of the Kernel Clustering problem with 4 x 4 centered and spherical hypothesis matrix equals 2π/3.
Steven Heilman, Aukosh Jagannath, Assaf Naor
STOC2