Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhijit Chakraborty 0003
dblp:19/11047-3
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-1500-3699ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
alternative splicing analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ExTraMapper: exon- and transcript-level mappings for orthologous gene pairs · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ExTraMapper: exon- and transcript-level mappings for orthologous gene pairs · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
3d genome organization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number variation detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
hi-c data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › chromosomal aberration detection
translocation detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence conservation analysis · 0.5simulation · 0.3hi-c contact distribution analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ExTraMapper: exon- and transcript-level mappings for orthologous gene pairsabstractMOTIVATION: Access to large-scale genomics and transcriptomics data from various tissues and cell lines allowed the discovery of wide-spread alternative splicing events and alternative promoter usage in mammalians. Between human and mouse, gene-level orthology is currently present for nearly 16k protein-coding genes spanning a diverse repertoire of over 200k total transcript isoforms. RESULTS: Here, we describe a novel method, ExTraMapper, which leverages sequence conservation between exons of a pair of organisms and identifies a fine-scale orthology mapping at the exon and then transcript level. ExTraMapper identifies more than 350k exon mappings, as well as 30k transcript mappings between human and mouse using only sequence and gene annotation information. We demonstrate that ExTraMapper identifies a larger number of exon and transcript mappings compared to previous methods. Further, it identifies exon fusions, splits and losses due to splice site mutations, and finds mappings between microexons that are previously missed. By reanalysis of RNA-seq data from 13 matched human and mouse tissues, we show that ExTraMapper improves the correlation of transcript-specific expression levels suggesting a more accurate mapping of human and mouse transcripts. We also applied the method to detect conserved exon and transcript pairs between human and rhesus macaque genomes to highlight the point that ExTraMapper is applicable to any pair of organisms that have orthologous gene pairs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and the results are available at https://github.com/ay-lab/ExTraMapper and http://ay-lab-tools.lji.org/extramapper. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Abhijit Chakraborty 0003, Ferhat Ay, Ramana V. Davuluri |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2018 | Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C dataabstractMOTIVATION: Eukaryotic chromosomes adapt a complex and highly dynamic three-dimensional (3D) structure, which profoundly affects different cellular functions and outcomes including changes in epigenetic landscape and in gene expression. Making the scenario even more complex, cancer cells harbor chromosomal abnormalities [e.g. copy number variations (CNVs) and translocations] altering their genomes both at the sequence level and at the level of 3D organization. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques (e.g. Hi-C), which are originally developed for decoding the 3D structure of the chromatin, provide a great opportunity to simultaneously identify the locations of genomic rearrangements and to investigate the 3D genome organization in cancer cells. Even though Hi-C data has been used for validating known rearrangements, computational methods that can distinguish rearrangement signals from the inherent biases of Hi-C data and from the actual 3D conformation of chromatin, and can precisely detect rearrangement locations de novo have been missing. RESULTS: In this work, we characterize how intra and inter-chromosomal Hi-C contacts are distributed for normal and rearranged chromosomes to devise a new set of algorithms (i) to identify genomic segments that correspond to CNV regions such as amplifications and deletions (HiCnv), (ii) to call inter-chromosomal translocations and their boundaries (HiCtrans) from Hi-C experiments and (iii) to simulate Hi-C data from genomes with desired rearrangements and abnormalities (AveSim) in order to select optimal parameters for and to benchmark the accuracy of our methods. Our results on 10 different cancer cell lines with Hi-C data show that we identify a total number of 105 amplifications and 45 deletions together with 90 translocations, whereas we identify virtually no such events for two karyotypically normal cell lines. Our CNV predictions correlate very well with whole genome sequencing data among chromosomes with CNV events for a breast cancer cell line (r = 0.89) and capture most of the CNVs we simulate using Avesim. For HiCtrans predictions, we report evidence from the literature for 30 out of 90 translocations for eight of our cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we show that our tools identify and correctly classify relatively understudied rearrangements such as double minutes and homogeneously staining regions. Considering the inherent limitations of existing techniques for karyotyping (i.e. missing balanced rearrangements and those near repetitive regions), the accurate identification of CNVs and translocations in a cost-effective and high-throughput setting is still a challenge. Our results show that the set of tools we develop effectively utilize moderately sequenced Hi-C libraries (100-300 million reads) to identify known and de novo chromosomal rearrangements/abnormalities in well-established cancer cell lines. With the decrease in required number of cells and the increase in attainable resolution, we believe that our framework will pave the way towards comprehensive mapping of genomic rearrangements in primary cells from cancer patients using Hi-C. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CNV calling: https://github.com/ay-lab/HiCnv, Translocation calling: https://github.com/ay-lab/HiCtrans and Hi-C simulation: https://github.com/ay-lab/AveSim. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Abhijit Chakraborty 0003, Ferhat Ay |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | A survey on prediction of specificity-determining sites in proteinsabstractSpecificity-determining sites (SDS) are the key positions of a protein family that show a specific conservation of amino acids, related to the subfamily members of that family. SDS play crucial role in developing functional variation within the protein family during the course of evolution. Thus, it is important to identify SDS to understand the evolutionary process of diversification of biological functions within a protein family. A wide range of computational tools have been designed to detect such SDS. In this review, we intend to examine the concept of SDS in more details along with the advancements and drawbacks of different computational approaches designed towards successful prediction of SDS. Further, we discussed the algorithms behind the computational approaches developed till date and provide an exhaustive comparison of performance of each method. We also introduce a new ensemble approach, SubSite as another tool to predict SDS through a user-friendly webserver available at www.hpppi.iicb.res.in/subsite. Abhijit Chakraborty 0003, Saikat Chakrabarti 0001 |
Briefings Bioinform. | 1 |