Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard G. Larson

dblp:19/1105 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 97% Algorithms and data structures · 3% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 1%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Runtime systems and virtual machines · 77% Operating systems · 23%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science › algebraic logic
algebraic semantics
0.012002
An Algebraic Approach to Data Mining: Some Examples · ICDM 2002
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › computational number theory
primality testing
0.011982
On a Primality Test of Solovay and Strassen · SIAM J. Comput. 1982
Runtime systems and virtual machines
garbage collection
0.011977
Minimizing Garbage Collection as a Function of Region Size · SIAM J. Comput. 1977
Runtime systems and virtual machines › garbage collection
garbage collection scheduling
0.011977
Minimizing Garbage Collection as a Function of Region Size · SIAM J. Comput. 1977
Algorithms and data structures
algebraic computation
0.011976
Efficiency of Computation of Cayley Tables of 2-Groups · J. ACM 1976
Operating systems › resource management › memory management
region-based memory management
0.011977
Minimizing Garbage Collection as a Function of Region Size · SIAM J. Comput. 1977
Operating systems › resource management › memory management
virtual memory
0.011977
Minimizing Garbage Collection as a Function of Region Size · SIAM J. Comput. 1977
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
group theory
0.011976
Efficiency of Computation of Cayley Tables of 2-Groups · J. ACM 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

realization theorem · 0.1algebra of functions · 0.1error probability analysis · 0.0subgroup generation · 0.0performance modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 An Algebraic Approach to Data Mining: Some Examples
abstract
We introduce an algebraic approach to the foundations of data mining. Our approach is based upon two algebras of functions defined over a common state space X and a pairing between them. One algebra is an algebra of state space observations, and the other is an algebra of labeled sets of states. We interpret H as the algebraic encoding of the data and the pairing as the misclassification rate when the classifier f is applied to the set of states X. We give a realization theorem giving conditions on formal series of data sets built from D that imply there is a realization involving a state space X, a classifier f /spl isin/ R and a set of labeled states /spl chi/ /spl isin/ R/sub 0/ that yield this series.
Robert L. Grossman, Richard G. Larson
ICDM2
1995 An Algebraic Approach to Hybrid Systems
Robert L. Grossman, Richard G. Larson
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1992 Symbolic Computation of Derivations Using Labeled Trees
Robert L. Grossman, Richard G. Larson
J. Symb. Comput.2
1991 Computations Involving Differential Operators and Their Actions on Functions
abstract
The algorithms derived by Grossmann and Larson (1989) are further developed for rewriting expressions involving differential operators. The differential operators involved arise in the local analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. These algorithms are extended in two different directions: the algorithms are generalized so that they apply to differential operators on groups and the data structures and algorithms are developed to compute symbolically the action of differential operators on functions. Both of these generalizations are needed for applications.
Peter E. Crouch, Robert L. Grossman, Richard G. Larson
ISSAC3
1989 Labeled Trees and the Efficient Computation of Derivations
abstract
The effective parallel symbolic computation of operators under composition is discussed. Examples include differential operators under composition and vector fields under the Lie bracket. Data structures consisting of formal linear combinations of rooted labeled trees are discussed. A multiplication on rooted labeled trees is defined, thereby making the set of these data structures into an associative algebra. An algebra homomorphism is defined from the original algebra of operators into this algebra of trees. An algebra homomorphism from the algebra of trees into the algebra of differential operators is then described. The cancellation which occurs when noncommuting operators are expressed in terms of commuting ones occurs naturally when the operators are represented using this data structure. This leads to an algorithm which, for operators which are derivations, speeds up the computation exponentially in the degree of the operator. It is shown that the algebra of trees leads naturally to a parallel version of the algorithm.
Robert L. Grossman, Richard G. Larson
ISSAC2
1982 On a Primality Test of Solovay and Strassen
abstract
Solovay and Strassen [SIAM J. Comput., 6 (1977), pp. 84–85] propose a primality test based on the fact that for primes $p > 2$ we have $(a/ p) \equiv a^{(p - 1)/2} (\bmod p)$, where $(a / p)$ is the Jacobi symbol. We prove here that the strong pseudoprime test is better, in the sense that it never takes more time nor is less effective, and sometimes is quicker or more effective. We also discuss the probability of error in the strong pseudoprime test, and show that it is never greater than $\tfrac{1}{4}$.
A. O. L. Atkin, Richard G. Larson
SIAM J. Comput.2
1977 Minimizing Garbage Collection as a Function of Region Size
abstract
Under a virtual storage operating system, the time spent by a list processing language on garbage collection varies in a complex manner with the amount of memory allocated. This dependence is investigated and strategies for minimizing the time spent on garbage collection are given.
Richard G. Larson
SIAM J. Comput.1
1976 Efficiency of Computation of Cayley Tables of 2-Groups
abstract
Two algorithms for computing the multiplication table of a 2-group are described and discussed. One of the algorithms works in an element-by-element fashion; the other works in terms of subgroups generated by initial subsequences of the given sequence of generators. Estimates of computation times are given which show that the second algorithm is much more efficient than the first. It is also shown how the second algorithm can be modified to make it more useful, without using significantly more time.
Richard G. Larson
J. ACM1