Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter J. Kammer

dblp:19/1797 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Requirements engineering and software design · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
component-based software engineering
0.012000
Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approach · ICSE 2000
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
global software development
0.012000
Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approach · ICSE 2000
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approach
abstract
There is a long standing tension between efforts to provide coherent models of work processes and the support for the way in which work actually takes place. The well laid groundwork of extensive research on formalisms has led to a more recent focus on supporting dynamic ad-hoc work activities that are nonetheless driven by a notion of work (P.J. Kammer et al., 2000). The widely distributed character of the Internet expands the need for dynamic and adaptive capabilities. Process enactment may extend not only across widely distributed organizational groups, but across organizational boundaries, requiring the interaction of independently executing processes in a manageable way and support for fluidly created relationships between participants, be they individuals, groups, or organizations. The paper proposes an approach based on lightweight ubiquitous technologies and a dynamic component based view of process, to support distributed and adaptive enactment of work activities for software development. We use the term process architecture to describe the run-time infrastructure relating the various elements, for example people, artifacts, automated processes, and resources. These elements, including traditional engines, interact though layered event based mechanisms that allow dynamic composition of architectures on-the-fly.
Peter J. Kammer
ICSE1
2000 Techniques for Supporting Dynamic and Adaptive Workflow
Peter J. Kammer, Gregory Alan Bolcer, Richard N. Taylor, Arthur S. Hitomi, Mark Bergman
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.1