Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter J. Kammer
dblp:19/1797
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 50% Requirements engineering and software design · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
component-based software engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approach · ICSE 2000 |
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
global software development |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approach · ICSE 2000 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Supporting dynamic distributed work processes with a component and event based approachabstractThere is a long standing tension between efforts to provide coherent models of work processes and the support for the way in which work actually takes place. The well laid groundwork of extensive research on formalisms has led to a more recent focus on supporting dynamic ad-hoc work activities that are nonetheless driven by a notion of work (P.J. Kammer et al., 2000). The widely distributed character of the Internet expands the need for dynamic and adaptive capabilities. Process enactment may extend not only across widely distributed organizational groups, but across organizational boundaries, requiring the interaction of independently executing processes in a manageable way and support for fluidly created relationships between participants, be they individuals, groups, or organizations. The paper proposes an approach based on lightweight ubiquitous technologies and a dynamic component based view of process, to support distributed and adaptive enactment of work activities for software development. We use the term process architecture to describe the run-time infrastructure relating the various elements, for example people, artifacts, automated processes, and resources. These elements, including traditional engines, interact though layered event based mechanisms that allow dynamic composition of architectures on-the-fly. Peter J. Kammer |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2000 | Techniques for Supporting Dynamic and Adaptive Workflow
Peter J. Kammer, Gregory Alan Bolcer, Richard N. Taylor, Arthur S. Hitomi, Mark Bergman |
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work. | 1 |