Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Geremy Heitz

dblp:19/2592 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 37% Segmentation and scene understanding · 18% Learning theory · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Knowledge graphs · 80% Data integration and cleaning · 20%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.422014
From Data Fusion to Knowledge Fusion · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion · KDD 2014
Data integration and cleaning
data fusion
0.212014
From Data Fusion to Knowledge Fusion · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Knowledge graphs
knowledge base integration
0.212014
From Data Fusion to Knowledge Fusion · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph construction
knowledge extraction
0.212014
Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion · KDD 2014
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization
0.222009
Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009
Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · NIPS 2008
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112010
Object separation in x-ray image sets · CVPR 2010
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
margin-based classification
0.122008
Max-margin Classification of Data with Absent Features · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Max-margin classification of incomplete data · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.112008
Max-margin Classification of Data with Absent Features · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
contextual reasoning
0.112008
Learning Spatial Context: Using Stuff to Find Things · ECCV (1) 2008
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
holistic scene understanding
0.112008
Cascaded Classification Models: Combining Models for Holistic Scene Understanding · NIPS 2008
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
missing features
0.112008
Max-margin Classification of Data with Absent Features · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.112008
Cascaded Classification Models: Combining Models for Holistic Scene Understanding · NIPS 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
deformable object recognition
0.112006
Learning Object Shape: From Drawings to Images · CVPR (2) 2006
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
learning with incomplete data
0.112006
Max-margin classification of incomplete data · NIPS 2006
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape modeling
object shape modeling
0.112006
Learning Object Shape: From Drawings to Images · CVPR (2) 2006
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning
0.112006
Max-margin classification of incomplete data · NIPS 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge extraction
0.112014
From Data Fusion to Knowledge Fusion · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
3d point cloud segmentation
0.112005
Discriminative Learning of Markov Random Fields for Segmentation of 3D Scan Data · CVPR (2) 2005
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
x-ray imaging
0.012010
Object separation in x-ray image sets · CVPR 2010
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.012009
Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2009
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction
0.012008
Cascaded Classification Models: Combining Models for Holistic Scene Understanding · NIPS 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.012008
Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification · NIPS 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape reconstruction
0.012006
Learning Object Shape: From Drawings to Images · CVPR (2) 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.012005
Discriminative Learning of Markov Random Fields for Segmentation of 3D Scan Data · CVPR (2) 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data fusion techniques · 0.4multi-view projection · 0.2log-space additivity · 0.2supervised machine learning · 0.2probabilistic inference · 0.2shape matching · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1spatial context modeling · 0.1shape model · 0.1landmark points · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1cascaded classification models · 0.1shape transfer from drawings · 0.1piecewise-linear model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Canonicalizing Open Knowledge Bases
abstract
Open information extraction approaches have led to the creation of large knowledge bases from the Web. The problem with such methods is that their entities and relations are not canonicalized, leading to redundant and ambiguous facts. For example, they may store {Barack Obama, was born, Honolulu and {Obama, place of birth, Honolulu}. In this paper, we present an approach based on machine learning methods that can canonicalize such Open IE triples, by clustering synonymous names and phrases.
Luis Galárraga, Geremy Heitz, Kevin Murphy 0002, Fabian M. Suchanek
CIKM2
2014 Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion
abstract
Recent years have witnessed a proliferation of large-scale knowledge bases, including Wikipedia, Freebase, YAGO, Microsoft's Satori, and Google's Knowledge Graph. To increase the scale even further, we need to explore automatic methods for constructing knowledge bases. Previous approaches have primarily focused on text-based extraction, which can be very noisy. Here we introduce Knowledge Vault, a Web-scale probabilistic knowledge base that combines extractions from Web content (obtained via analysis of text, tabular data, page structure, and human annotations) with prior knowledge derived from existing knowledge repositories. We employ supervised machine learning methods for fusing these distinct information sources. The Knowledge Vault is substantially bigger than any previously published structured knowledge repository, and features a probabilistic inference system that computes calibrated probabilities of fact correctness. We report the results of multiple studies that explore the relative utility of the different information sources and extraction methods.
Xin Dong 0001, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Ni Lao, Kevin Murphy 0002, Thomas Strohmann, Shaohua Sun, Wei Zhang 0152
KDD3
2014 From Data Fusion to Knowledge Fusion
abstract
The task of data fusion is to identify the true values of data items ( e.g. , the true date of birth for Tom Cruise ) among multiple observed values drawn from different sources ( e.g. , Web sites) of varying (and unknown) reliability. A recent survey [20] has provided a detailed comparison of various fusion methods on Deep Web data. In this paper, we study the applicability and limitations of different fusion techniques on a more challenging problem: knowledge fusion . Knowledge fusion identifies true subject-predicate-object triples extracted by multiple information extractors from multiple information sources. These extractors perform the tasks of entity linkage and schema alignment, thus introducing an additional source of noise that is quite different from that traditionally considered in the data fusion literature, which only focuses on factual errors in the original sources. We adapt state-of-the-art data fusion techniques and apply them to a knowledge base with 1.6B unique knowledge triples extracted by 12 extractors from over 1B Web pages, which is three orders of magnitude larger than the data sets used in previous data fusion papers. We show great promise of the data fusion approaches in solving the knowledge fusion problem, and suggest interesting research directions through a detailed error analysis of the methods.
Xin Dong 0001, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Kevin Murphy 0002, Shaohua Sun, Wei Zhang 0152
Proc. VLDB Endow.3
2010 Object separation in x-ray image sets
abstract
In the segmentation of natural images, most algorithms rely on the concept of occlusion. In x-ray images, however, this assumption is violated, since x-ray photons penetrate most materials. In this paper, we introduce SATISφ, a method for separating objects in a set of x-ray images using the property of additivity in log space, where the log-attenuation at a pixel is the sum of the log-attenuations of all objects that the corresponding x-ray passes through. Our method leverages multiple projection views of the same scene from slightly different angles to produce an accurate estimate of attenuation properties of objects in the scene. These properties can be used to identify the material composition of these objects, and are therefore crucial for applications like automatic threat detection. We evaluate SATISφ on a set of collected x-ray scans, showing that it outperforms a standard image segmentation approach and reduces the error of material estimation.
Geremy Heitz, Gal Chechik
CVPR1
2009 Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification
Geremy Heitz, Gal Elidan, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2008 Learning Spatial Context: Using Stuff to Find Things
Geremy Heitz, Daphne Koller
ECCV (1)1
2008 Shape-Based Object Localization for Descriptive Classification
abstract
Discriminative tasks, including object categorization and detection, are central components of high-level computer vision. Sometimes, however, we are interested in more refined aspects of the object in an image, such as pose or particular regions. In this paper we develop a method (LOOPS) for learning a shape and image feature model that can be trained on a particular object class, and used to outline instances of the class in novel images. Furthermore, while the training data consists of uncorresponded outlines, the resulting LOOPS model contains a set of landmark points that appear consistently across instances, and can be accurately localized in an image. Our model achieves state-of-the-art results in precisely outlining objects that exhibit large deformations and articulations in cluttered natural images. These localizations can then be used to address a range of tasks, including descriptive classification, search, and clustering.
Geremy Heitz, Gal Elidan, Benjamin Packer, Daphne Koller
NIPS1
2008 Cascaded Classification Models: Combining Models for Holistic Scene Understanding
abstract
One of the original goals of computer vision was to fully understand a natural scene. This requires solving several problems simultaneously, including object detection, labeling of meaningful regions, and 3d reconstruction. While great progress has been made in tackling each of these problems in isolation, only recently have researchers again been considering the difficult task of assembling various methods to the mutual benefit of all. We consider learning a set of such classification models in such a way that they both solve their own problem and help each other. We develop a framework known as Cascaded Classification Models (CCM), where repeated instantiations of these classifiers are coupled by their input/output variables in a cascade that improves performance at each level. Our method requires only a limited “black box” interface with the models, allowing us to use very sophisticated, state-of-the-art classifiers without having to look under the hood. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a large set of natural images by combining the subtasks of scene categorization, object detection, multiclass image segmentation, and 3d scene reconstruction.
Geremy Heitz, Stephen Gould, Ashutosh Saxena, Daphne Koller
NIPS1
2008 Convex Point Estimation using Undirected Bayesian Transfer Hierarchies
Gal Elidan, Benjamin Packer, Geremy Heitz, Daphne Koller
UAI3
2008 Max-margin Classification of Data with Absent Features
Gal Chechik, Geremy Heitz, Gal Elidan, Pieter Abbeel, Daphne Koller
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2006 Learning Object Shape: From Drawings to Images
abstract
We consider the important challenge of recognizing a variety of deformable object classes in images. Of fundamental importance and particular difficulty in this setting is the problem of "outlining" an object, rather than simply deciding on its presence or absence. A major obstacle in learning a model that will allow us to address this task is the need for hand-segmented training images. In this paper we present a novel landmark-based, piecewise-linear model of the shape of an object class. We then formulate a learning approach that allows us to learn this model with minimal user supervision. We circumvent the need for hand-segmentation by transferring the shape "essence" of an object from drawings to complex images. We show that our method is able to automatically and effectively learn and localize a variety of object classes.
Gal Elidan, Geremy Heitz, Daphne Koller
CVPR (2)2
2006 Max-margin classification of incomplete data
abstract
We consider the problem of learning classifiers for structurally incomplete data, where some ob jects have a subset of features inherently absent due to complex relationships between the features. The common approach for handling missing features is to begin with a preprocessing phase that completes the missing features, and then use a standard classification procedure. In this paper we show how incomplete data can be classified directly without any completion of the missing features using a max-margin learning framework. We formulate this task using a geometrically-inspired ob jective function, and discuss two optimization approaches: The linearly separable case is written as a set of convex feasibility problems, and the non-separable case has a non-convex ob jective that we optimize iteratively. By avoiding the pre-processing phase in which the data is completed, these approaches offer considerable computational savings. More importantly, we show that by elegantly handling complex patterns of missing values, our approach is both competitive with other methods when the values are missing at random and outperforms them when the missing values have non-trivial structure. We demonstrate our results on two real-world problems: edge prediction in metabolic pathways, and automobile detection in natural images.
Gal Chechik, Geremy Heitz, Gal Elidan, Pieter Abbeel, Daphne Koller
NIPS2
2005 Discriminative Learning of Markov Random Fields for Segmentation of 3D Scan Data
abstract
We address the problem of segmenting 3D scan data into objects or object classes. Our segmentation framework is based on a subclass of Markov random fields (MRFs) which support efficient graph-cut inference. The MRF models incorporate a large set of diverse features and enforce the preference that adjacent scan points have the same classification label. We use a recently proposed maximum-margin framework to discriminatively train the model from a set of labeled scans; as a result we automatically learn the relative importance of the features for the segmentation task. Performing graph-cut inference in the trained MRF can then be used to segment new scenes very efficiently. We test our approach on three large-scale datasets produced by different kinds of 3D sensors, showing its applicability to both outdoor and indoor environments containing diverse objects.
Dragomir Anguelov, Ben Taskar, Vassil Chatalbashev, Daphne Koller, Dinkar Gupta, Geremy Heitz, Andrew Y. Ng
CVPR (2)6