Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ai Li
dblp:19/2930
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 77% Program analysis · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 50% Memory systems · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Network neighborhood analysis with the multi-node topological overlap measure · Bioinform. 2007 |
Compilers and program optimization › parallel program optimization
communication optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data Sharing · HPDC 1994 |
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
compile-time transformation |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data Sharing · HPDC 1994 |
Memory systems › shared memory
distributed shared memory |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data Sharing · HPDC 1994 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data Sharing · HPDC 1994 |
Program analysis
loop analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data Sharing · HPDC 1994 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data Sharing · HPDC 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
permutation testing · 0.1network analysis · 0.1compile-time analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Network neighborhood analysis with the multi-node topological overlap measureabstractMOTIVATION: The goal of neighborhood analysis is to find a set of genes (the neighborhood) that is similar to an initial 'seed' set of genes. Neighborhood analysis methods for network data are important in systems biology. If individual network connections are susceptible to noise, it can be advantageous to define neighborhoods on the basis of a robust interconnectedness measure, e.g. the topological overlap measure. Since the use of multiple nodes in the seed set may lead to more informative neighborhoods, it can be advantageous to define multi-node similarity measures. RESULTS: The pairwise topological overlap measure is generalized to multiple network nodes and subsequently used in a recursive neighborhood construction method. A local permutation scheme is used to determine the neighborhood size. Using four network applications and a simulated example, we provide empirical evidence that the resulting neighborhoods are biologically meaningful, e.g. we use neighborhood analysis to identify brain cancer related genes. AVAILABILITY: An executable Windows program and tutorial for multi-node topological overlap measure (MTOM) based analysis can be downloaded from the webpage (http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/labs/horvath/MTOM/). Ai Li, Steve Horvath |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 1994 | Program Analysis and Transformations for Fast Data SharingabstractDistributed Shared Memory (DSM) systems have been proposed to combine the programmability of traditional shared memory and the scalability of message-passing systems. Eager DSM systems can greatly reduce access latencies for remote data by keeping copies of shared values in local memory and updating them immediately whenever a shared datum changes. However, sharing all changes globally can limit the system performance. It is usually possible to transform a program into an equivalent form that generates much less traffic, and therefore executes much more efficiently. This paper describes a compile-time analysis model for transforming simple shared memory programs with parallelized loop structures into programs that are optimized for efficient execution on eager DSM systems.> Ai Li, Gudjon Hermannsson, Larry D. Wittie |
HPDC | 1 |
| 1992 | Eager Sharing fo Efficient Massive Parallelism
Larry D. Wittie, Gudjon Hermannsson, Ai Li |
ICPP (2) | 3 |
| 1988 | On the Semantics of Rule-Based Expert Systems with Uncertainty
Michael Kifer, Ai Li |
ICDT | 2 |