Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xu Han 0009
dblp:19/3011-9
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 43% Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Segmentation and scene understanding · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
probability calibration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibration · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibration · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
temperature scaling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibration · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › image registration
affine registration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Networks for Joint Affine and Non-Parametric Image Registration · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › image registration
deformable image registration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Networks for Joint Affine and Non-Parametric Image Registration · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › image registration
medical image registration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Networks for Joint Affine and Non-Parametric Image Registration · CVPR 2019 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
medical image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibration · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 1.4local temperature prediction · 1.0u-net · 0.4stationary velocity field · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)abstractIn this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094. Patrick Bilic, Patrick Ferdinand Christ, Hongwei Li 0004, Eugene Vorontsov, Avi Ben-Cohen, Georgios Kaissis, Adi Szeskin, Colin Jacobs, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Mamani, Gabriel Chartrand, Fabian Lohöfer, Julian Walter Holch, Wieland H. Sommer, Felix Hofmann, Alexandre Hostettler, Naama Lev-Cohain, Michal Drozdzal, Michal Amitai, Refael Vivanti, Jacob Sosna, Ivan Ezhov, Anjany Sekuboyina, Fernando Navarro, Florian Kofler, Johannes C. Paetzold, Suprosanna Shit, Xiaobin Hu, Jana Lipková, Markus Rempfler, Marie Piraud, Jan Kirschke, Benedikt Wiestler, Christian Hülsemeyer, Marcel Beetz, Florian Ettlinger, Michela Antonelli, Woong Bae, Miriam Bellver, Lei Bi 0001, Hao Chen 0011, Grzegorz Chlebus, Erik Dam, Qi Dou 0001, Chi-Wing Fu, Bogdan Georgescu, Xavier Giró-i-Nieto, Felix Grün, Xu Han 0009, Pheng-Ann Heng, Jürgen Hesser, Jan Hendrik Moltz, Christian Igel, Fabian Isensee, Paul F. Jaeger, Fucang Jia, Krishna Chaitanya Kaluva, Mahendra Khened, Ildoo Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Sungwoong Kim, Simon Kohl, Tomasz K. Konopczynski, Avinash Kori, Ganapathy Krishnamurthi, Xiaomeng Li 0001, John S. Lowengrub, Jun Ma 0016, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Hans Meine, Dorit Merhof, Akshay Pai, Mathias Perslev, Jens Petersen, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Xiaojuan Qi 0001, Oliver Rippel, Karsten Roth, Ignacio Sarasua, Andrea Schenk, Zengming Shen, Jordi Torres, Christian Wachinger, Chunliang Wang, Leon Weninger, Daguang Xu, Xiaoping Yang 0001, Simon C. H. Yu, Yading Yuan, Miao Yue, Liping Zhang 0009, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Spyridon Bakas, Rickmer Braren, Volker Heinemann, Christopher Joseph Pal, An Tang, Samuel Kadoury, Luc Soler, Bram van Ginneken, Hayit Greenspan, Leo Joskowicz, Bjoern Menze |
Medical Image Anal. | 49 |
| 2021 | Local Temperature Scaling for Probability CalibrationabstractFor semantic segmentation, label probabilities are often uncalibrated as they are typically only the by-product of a segmentation task. Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice score are often used as criteria for segmentation success, while metrics related to label probabilities are not often explored. However, probability calibration approaches have been studied, which match probability outputs with experimentally observed errors. These approaches mainly focus on classification tasks, but not on semantic segmentation. Thus, we propose a learning-based calibration method that focuses on multi-label semantic segmentation. Specifically, we adopt a convolutional neural network to predict local temperature values for probability calibration. One advantage of our approach is that it does not change prediction accuracy, hence allowing for calibration as a postprocessing step. Experiments on the COCO, CamVid, and LPBA40 datasets demonstrate improved calibration performance for a range of different metrics. We also demonstrate the good performance of our method for multi-atlas brain segmentation from magnetic resonance images. Zhipeng Ding, Xu Han 0009, Peirong Liu, Marc Niethammer |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2019 | Networks for Joint Affine and Non-Parametric Image RegistrationabstractWe introduce an end-to-end deep-learning framework for 3D medical image registration. In contrast to existing approaches, our framework combines two registration methods: an affine registration and a vector momentum-parameterized stationary velocity field (vSVF) model. Specifically, it consists of three stages. In the first stage, a multi-step affine network predicts affine transform parameters. In the second stage, we use a U-Net-like network to generate a momentum, from which a velocity field can be computed via smoothing. Finally, in the third stage, we employ a self-iterable map-based vSVF component to provide a non-parametric refinement based on the current estimate of the transformation map. Once the model is trained, a registration is completed in one forward pass. To evaluate the performance, we conducted longitudinal and cross-subject experiments on 3D magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the knee of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) dataset. Results show that our framework achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art medical image registration approaches, but it is much faster, with a better control of transformation regularity including the ability to produce approximately symmetric transformations, and combining affine as well as non-parametric registration. Zhengyang Shen, Xu Han 0009, Zhenlin Xu, Marc Niethammer |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | VoteNet: A Deep Learning Label Fusion Method for Multi-atlas Segmentation
Zhipeng Ding, Xu Han 0009, Marc Niethammer |
MICCAI (3) | 2 |