Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lei Xu 0014

dblp:19/360-14 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification
0.112005
Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational oncology
cancer classification from gene expression
0.112005
Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.112005
Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
marker gene identification
0.112005
Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112005
Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012005
Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression quantification
microarray gene expression
0.012005
Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

top-scoring pair classifier · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1statistical integration · 0.1relative expression reversals · 0.1naive bayes · 0.1k-top scoring pairs · 0.1k-nearest neighbour · 0.1decision tree · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Merging microarray data from separate breast cancer studies provides a robust prognostic test
abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for new prognostic markers of breast cancer metastases to ensure that newly diagnosed patients receive appropriate therapy. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential value of gene expression signatures in assessing the risk of developing distant metastases. However, due to the small sample sizes of individual studies, the overlap among signatures is almost zero and their predictive power is often limited. Integrating microarray data from multiple studies in order to increase sample size is therefore a promising approach to the development of more robust prognostic tests. RESULTS: In this study, by using a highly stable data aggregation procedure based on expression comparisons, we have integrated three independent microarray gene expression data sets for breast cancer and identified a structured prognostic signature consisting of 112 genes organized into 80 pair-wise expression comparisons. A classical likelihood ratio test based on these comparisons, essentially weighted voting, achieves 88.6% sensitivity and 54.6% specificity in an independent external test set of 154 samples. The test is highly informative in assessing the risk of developing distant metastases within five years (hazard ratio 9.3 with 95% CI 2.9-29.9). CONCLUSION: Rank-based features provide a stable way to integrate patient data from separate microarray studies due to invariance to data normalization, and such features can be combined into a useful predictor of distant metastases in breast cancer within a statistical modeling framework which begins to capture gene-gene interactions. Upon further confirmation on large-scale independent data, such prognostic signatures and tests could provide a powerful tool to guide adjuvant systemic treatment that could greatly reduce the cost of breast cancer treatment, both in terms of toxic side effects and health care expenditures.
Lei Xu 0014, Aik Choon Tan, Raimond L. Winslow, Donald Geman
BMC Bioinform.1
2007 Large-scale integration of cancer microarray data identifies a robust common cancer signature
abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a continuing need to develop molecular diagnostic tools which complement histopathologic examination to increase the accuracy of cancer diagnosis. DNA microarrays provide a means for measuring gene expression signatures which can then be used as components of genomic-based diagnostic tests to determine the presence of cancer. RESULTS: In this study, we collect and integrate ~1500 microarray gene expression profiles from 26 published cancer data sets across 21 major human cancer types. We then apply a statistical method, referred to as the Top-Scoring Pair of Groups (TSPG) classifier, and a repeated random sampling strategy to the integrated training data sets and identify a common cancer signature consisting of 46 genes. These 46 genes are naturally divided into two distinct groups; those in one group are typically expressed less than those in the other group for cancer tissues. Given a new expression profile, the classifier discriminates cancer from normal tissues by ranking the expression values of the 46 genes in the cancer signature and comparing the average ranks of the two groups. This signature is then validated by applying this decision rule to independent test data. CONCLUSION: By combining the TSPG method and repeated random sampling, a robust common cancer signature has been identified from large-scale microarray data integration. Upon further validation, this signature may be useful as a robust and objective diagnostic test for cancer.
Lei Xu 0014, Donald Geman, Raimond L. Winslow
BMC Bioinform.1
2005 Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles
abstract
MOTIVATION: Various studies have shown that cancer tissue samples can be successfully detected and classified by their gene expression patterns using machine learning approaches. One of the challenges in applying these techniques for classifying gene expression data is to extract accurate, readily interpretable rules providing biological insight as to how classification is performed. Current methods generate classifiers that are accurate but difficult to interpret. This is the trade-off between credibility and comprehensibility of the classifiers. Here, we introduce a new classifier in order to address these problems. It is referred to as k-TSP (k-Top Scoring Pairs) and is based on the concept of 'relative expression reversals'. This method generates simple and accurate decision rules that only involve a small number of gene-to-gene expression comparisons, thereby facilitating follow-up studies. RESULTS: In this study, we have compared our approach to other machine learning techniques for class prediction in 19 binary and multi-class gene expression datasets involving human cancers. The k-TSP classifier performs as efficiently as Prediction Analysis of Microarray and support vector machine, and outperforms other learning methods (decision trees, k-nearest neighbour and naïve Bayes). Our approach is easy to interpret as the classifier involves only a small number of informative genes. For these reasons, we consider the k-TSP method to be a useful tool for cancer classification from microarray gene expression data. AVAILABILITY: The software and datasets are available at http://www.ccbm.jhu.edu CONTACT: [email protected].
Aik Choon Tan, Daniel Q. Naiman, Lei Xu 0014, Raimond L. Winslow, Donald Geman
Bioinform.3
2005 Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA microarray data analysis has been used previously to identify marker genes which discriminate cancer from normal samples. However, due to the limited sample size of each study, there are few common markers among different studies of the same cancer. With the rapid accumulation of microarray data, it is of great interest to integrate inter-study microarray data to increase sample size, which could lead to the discovery of more reliable markers. RESULTS: We present a novel, simple method of integrating different microarray datasets to identify marker genes and apply the method to prostate cancer datasets. In this study, by applying a new statistical method, referred to as the top-scoring pair (TSP) classifier, we have identified a pair of robust marker genes (HPN and STAT6) by integrating microarray datasets from three different prostate cancer studies. Cross-platform validation shows that the TSP classifier built from the marker gene pair, which simply compares relative expression values, achieves high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity on independent datasets generated using various array platforms. Our findings suggest a new model for the discovery of marker genes from accumulated microarray data and demonstrate how the great wealth of microarray data can be exploited to increase the power of statistical analysis. CONTACT: [email protected].
Lei Xu 0014, Aik Choon Tan, Daniel Q. Naiman, Donald Geman, Raimond L. Winslow
Bioinform.1