Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Sussman

dblp:19/3618 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 50% Cloud and datacenter computing · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › distributed systems
distributed operating system
0.011975
An Operating System for Computer Resource Sharing · SOSP 1975
Operating systems › resource management
resource sharing
0.011975
An Operating System for Computer Resource Sharing · SOSP 1975
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
network sharing
0.011975
An Operating System for Computer Resource Sharing · SOSP 1975
Distributed systems
resource sharing
0.011975
An Operating System for Computer Resource Sharing · SOSP 1975
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1975 An Operating System for Computer Resource Sharing
abstract
Users and administrators of a small computer often desire more service than it can provide. In a network environment additional services can be provided to the small computer, and in turn to the users of the small computer, by one or more other computers. An operational system for providing such “resource sharing” is described; some “fundamental principles” are abstracted from the experience gained in constructing the system; and some generalizations are suggested.
Bernard P. Cosell, Paul R. Johnson, J. H. Malman, Richard E. Schantz, J. Sussman, Robert Thomas 0001, David C. Walden
SOSP5