Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert

Robert W. van Kralingen

dblp:19/3968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
knowledge-based design		 0.011999
A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

principled approach · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems
Robert W. van Kralingen, Pepijn R. S. Visser, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, H. Jaap van den Herik
 Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
1997 A Method for the Development of Legal Knowledge Systems
abstract
In this article we present a four-phased method for the development of legal knowledge systems.We set out from the well-studied CommonKADS method for the development of knowledge systems and tailor this method to the legal domain.In particular, we propose a generic legal ontology, and describe the creation of statute-specific ontologies to make the method more suitable for our purposes.In the construction of these ontologies we start from a theoretical analysis of the legal domain.The well-known example of the Imperial College Library Regulations (ICLR) is used to illustrate the method.
Pepijn R. S. Visser, Robert W. van Kralingen, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
 ICAIL2
1997 Bringing IT Support for Legislative Drafting one Step Further: From Drafting Dupport to Design Assistance (Abstract)
Wim Voermans, Robert W. van Kralingen
 ICAIL2