Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Artur Merke

dblp:19/4212 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 79% Optimization for machine learning · 21%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
linear function approximation
0.122004
Convergence of synchronous reinforcement learning with linear function approximation · ICML 2004
Convergent Combinations of Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.122003
TD(0) Converges Provably Faster than the Residual Gradient Algorithm · ICML 2003
Convergent Combinations of Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.122003
TD(0) Converges Provably Faster than the Residual Gradient Algorithm · ICML 2003
Convergent Combinations of Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning theory
convergence of reinforcement learning
0.012004
Convergence of synchronous reinforcement learning with linear function approximation · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.022002
A Necessary Condition of Convergence for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation · ICML 2002
Convergent Combinations of Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation
0.012002
A Necessary Condition of Convergence for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation · ICML 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inhomogeneous matrix iteration · 0.0counterexample construction · 0.0residual gradient algorithm · 0.0synchronous updates · 0.0linear function approximation · 0.0function approximation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Convergence of synchronous reinforcement learning with linear function approximation
abstract
Synchronous reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms with linear function approximation are representable as inhomogeneous matrix iterations of a special form (Schoknecht & Merke, 2003). In this paper we state conditions of convergence for general inhomogeneous matrix iterations and prove that they are both necessary and sufficient. This result extends the work presented in (Schoknecht & Merke, 2003), where only a sufficient condition of convergence was proved. As the condition of convergence is necessary and sufficient, the new result is suitable to prove convergence and divergence of RL algorithms with function approximation. We use the theorem to deduce a new concise proof of convergence for the synchronous residual gradient algorithm (Baird, 1995). Moreover, we derive a counterexample for which the uniform RL algorithm (Merke & Schoknecht, 2002) diverges. This yields a negative answer to the open question if the uniform RL algorithm converges for arbitrary multiple transitions.
Artur Merke, Ralf Schoknecht
ICML1
2003 TD(0) Converges Provably Faster than the Residual Gradient Algorithm
Ralf Schoknecht, Artur Merke
ICML2
2002 A Necessary Condition of Convergence for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation
Artur Merke, Ralf Schoknecht
ICML1
2002 Convergent Combinations of Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation
abstract
Convergence for iterative reinforcement learning algorithms like TD(O) depends on the sampling strategy for the transitions. How(cid:173) ever, in practical applications it is convenient to take transition data from arbitrary sources without losing convergence. In this paper we investigate the problem of repeated synchronous updates based on a fixed set of transitions. Our main theorem yields suffi(cid:173) cient conditions of convergence for combinations of reinforcement learning algorithms and linear function approximation. This allows to analyse if a certain reinforcement learning algorithm and a cer(cid:173) tain function approximator are compatible. For the combination of the residual gradient algorithm with grid-based linear interpolation we show that there exists a universal constant learning rate such that the iteration converges independently of the concrete transi(cid:173) tion data.
Ralf Schoknecht, Artur Merke
NIPS2
2001 Karlsruhe Brainstormers - A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Robotic Soccer
Artur Merke, Martin A. Riedmiller
RoboCup1
2000 Karlsruhe Brainstormers 2000 Team Description
Martin A. Riedmiller, Artur Merke, David Meier, Andreas Hoffmann 0004, Alex Sinner, Ortwin Thate
RoboCup2
2000 Karlsruhe Brainstormers - A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Robotic Soccer
Martin A. Riedmiller, Artur Merke, David Meier, Andreas Hoffmann 0004, Alex Sinner, Ortwin Thate, R. Ehrmann
RoboCup2
1999 Karlsruhe Brainstormers - Design Principles
Martin A. Riedmiller, Sebastian Buck 0001, Artur Merke, R. Ehrmann, Ortwin Thate, S. Dilger, Alex Sinner, Andreas Hoffmann 0004, Lutz Frommberger
RoboCup3