Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Plant
dblp:19/4935
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0239-2090ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 77% Computational social science and digital humanities · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education › STEM education
data science education |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | How to Data in Datathons · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › privacy-preserving representation learning
privacy-preserving text representation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learning · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learning · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential privacy · 1.0adversarial learning · 1.0framework · 0.7case study · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | You Are What You Write: Author re-identification privacy attacks in the era of pre-trained language modelsabstractThe widespread use of pre-trained language models has revolutionised knowledge transfer in natural language processing tasks. However, there is a concern regarding potential breaches of user trust due to the risk of re-identification attacks, where malicious users could extract Personally Identifiable Information (PII) from other datasets. To assess the extent of extractable personal information on popular pre-trained models, we conduct the first wide coverage evaluation and comparison of state-of-the-art privacy-preserving algorithms on a large multi-lingual dataset for sentiment analysis annotated with demographic information (including location, age, and gender). Our results suggest a link between model complexity, pre-training data volume, and the efficacy of privacy-preserving embeddings. We found that privacy-preserving methods demonstrate greater effectiveness when applied to larger and more complex models, with improvements exceeding > 20 % over non-private baselines. Additionally, we observe that local differential privacy imposes serious performance penalties of ≈ 20 % in our test setting, which can be mitigated using hybrid or metric-DP techniques. • Compares privacy-preservation techniques across popular language models. • Analysis demonstrates significant reduction in relative attack success. • Uses a multilingual corpus, illustrating results on diverse European languages. • Includes both high-, medium-, and lower-resource languages. • To our knowledge, this is the first study to extend this analysis beyond English. • Expands on previous work (Plant et al., 2021) with MDP and CGT techniques. Richard Plant, Valerio Giuffrida, Dimitra Gkatzia |
Comput. Speech Lang. | 1 |
| 2023 | How to Data in DatathonsabstractThe rise of datathons, also known as data or data science hackathons, has provided a platform to collaborate, learn, and innovate quickly. Despite their significant potential benefits, organizations often struggle to effectively work with data due to a lack of clear guidelines and best practices for potential issues that might arise. Drawing on our own experiences and insights from organizing +80 datathon challenges with +60 partnership organizations since 2016, we provide a guide that serves as a resource for organizers to navigate the data-related complexities of datathons. We apply our proposed framework to 10 case studies. Carlos Mougan, Richard Plant, Clare Teng, Marya Bazzi, Alvaro Cabrejas Egea, Ryan Sze-Yin Chan, David Salvador Jasin, Martin Stoffel, Kirstie J. Whitaker, Jules Manser |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language LearningabstractNeural language models have contributed to state-of-the-art results in a number of downstream applications including sentiment analysis, intent classification and others.However, obtaining text representations or embeddings using these models risks encoding personally identifiable information learned from language and context cues that may lead to privacy leaks.To ameliorate this issue, we propose Context-Aware Private Embeddings (CAPE), a novel approach which combines differential privacy and adversarial learning to preserve privacy during training of embeddings.Specifically, CAPE firstly applies calibrated noise through differential privacy to maintain the privacy of text representations by preserving the encoded semantic links while obscuring sensitive information.Next, CAPE employs an adversarial training regime that obscures identified private variables.Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach is more effective in reducing private information leakage than either single intervention, with approximately a 3% reduction in attacker performance compared to the best-performing current method. Richard Plant, Dimitra Gkatzia, Valerio Giuffrida |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |