Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul T. Cummings

dblp:19/5790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 62% Usable security · 29% Authentication and access control · 9%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.011990
Compartmented Mode Workstation: Prototype Highlights · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1990
Usable security
security labels
0.011990
Compartmented Mode Workstation: Prototype Highlights · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1990
Systems and software security
multilevel security
0.011987
Compartimented Mode Workstation: Results Through Prototyping · S&P 1987
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
secure operating system
0.011987
Compartimented Mode Workstation: Results Through Prototyping · S&P 1987
Authentication and access control
access control
0.011990
Compartmented Mode Workstation: Prototype Highlights · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1990
Systems and software security › secure software development
security requirements
0.011987
Compartimented Mode Workstation: Results Through Prototyping · S&P 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

security requirements implementation · 0.0prototyping · 0.0prototype implementation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Compartmented Mode Workstation: Prototype Highlights
abstract
The primary goal of the MITRE compartmented mode workstation (CMW) project was to articulate the security requirements that workstations must meet to process highly classified intelligence data. As a basis for the validity of the requirements developed, a prototype was implemented which demonstrated that workstations could meet the requirements in an operationally useful manner while still remaining binary compatible with off-the-shelf software. The security requirements not only addressed traditional security concerns but also introduced concepts in areas such as labeling and the use of a trusted window management system. The CMW labeling paradigm is based on associating two types of security labels with objects: sensitivity levels and information labels. Sensitivity levels describe the levels at which objects must be protected. Information labels are used to prevent data overclassification and also provide a mechanism for associating with data those markings that are required for accurate data labeling, but which play no role in access control decisions. The use of a trusted window manager allows users to easily operate at multiple sensitivity levels and provides a convenient mechanism for communicating security information to users in a relatively unobtrusive manner.>
Jeffrey L. Berger, Jeffrey Picciotto, John P. L. Woodward, Paul T. Cummings
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.4
1987 Compartimented Mode Workstation: Results Through Prototyping
abstract
The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) recognized that commercially available workstations could significantly enhance the capabilities of today's Intelligence Data Handling Systems (IDHS) if they could be integrated with the IDHS systems in a secure manner. The Compartmented Mode Workstation (CMW) project was started at the request of the DIA to further the state-of-the-art of computer security in general and workstation security in particular. The prototype effort had two major purposes. The first purpose was to demonstrate that operationally useful implementations of each requirement could be designed and developed. The second, more general, purpose was to gain insight into what measures could be taken to augment commercially available workstations with meaningful security. Therefore, as the Security Requirements for System High and Compartmented Mode Workstations [CMWREQS] were stated, a development team attempted to implement thereon the CMW prototype. Viable approaches were found for all requirements thereby verifying the premise that a workstation and its associated operating system could be modified such that off-the-shelf software (distributed in binary form) could execute with adequate security .This paper describes compartmented mode operation, how the prototype satisfied each requirement, and the level of effort involved in the prototype implementation.
Paul T. Cummings, D. A. Fullam, M. J. Goldstein, M. J. Gosselin, Jeffrey Picciotto, John P. L. Woodward, J. Wynn
S&P1