Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jukka Mannerkoski

dblp:19/5973 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › equalization
blind equalization
0.012001
Performance bounds for multistep prediction-based blind equalization · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2001
Physical-layer communications
equalization
0.012001
Performance bounds for multistep prediction-based blind equalization · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0multi-step prediction · 0.0analytical error bounds · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Performance bounds for multistep prediction-based blind equalization
abstract
Blind equalization attempts to remove the interference caused by a communication channel without using any known training sequences. Blind equalizers may be implemented with linear prediction-error filters (PEFs). For many practical channel types, a suitable delay at the output of the equalizer allows for achieving a small estimation error. The delay cannot be controlled with one-step predictors. Consequently, multistep PEF-based algorithms have been suggested as a solution to the problem. The derivation of the existing algorithms is based on the assumption of a noiseless channel, which results in zero-forcing equalization. We consider the effects of additive noise at the output of the multistep PEF. Analytical error bounds for two PEF-based blind equalizers in the presence of noise are derived. The obtained results are verified with simulations. The effect of energy concentration in the channel impulse response on the error bound is also addressed.
Jukka Mannerkoski, Visa Koivunen, Desmond P. Taylor
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1999 Prediction-based adaptive blind equalization: a performance study
abstract
Blind equalization of a communication channel using a prediction-based lattice blind equalizer (LBE) is considered. Second order cyclostationary statistics and a single-input multiple-output model arising from fractional sampling of the received data are used. The performance of the LBE algorithm is studied in extensive simulations where commonly used example channels are employed. Convergence in the mean square error (MSE) and symbol error rate (SER) as well as the number of symbols required to open the eye are studied at different SNRs. Robustness in the face of channel order mismatch and channels with common subchannel zeros is considered. The simulation results are compared to the results obtained by the fractionally spaced constant modulus algorithm, the cyclic-RLS algorithm and the subspace method by Moulines et al. (see IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., vol.43, no.2, p.516-25, 1995).
Jukka Mannerkoski, Visa Koivunen, Desmond P. Taylor
ICASSP1