Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Harder

dblp:19/6134 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 82% Computational science and engineering · 18%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis
0.222012
Fast large-scale clustering of protein structures using Gauss integrals · Bioinform. 2012
Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures · Bioinform. 2007
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation › molecular dynamics
molecular dynamics analysis
0.112012
Fast large-scale clustering of protein structures using Gauss integrals · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
protein structure clustering
0.112012
Fast large-scale clustering of protein structures using Gauss integrals · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.112012
Fast large-scale clustering of protein structures using Gauss integrals · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › template-based modeling
fold recognition
0.112007
Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.112007
Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

k-means clustering · 0.1gauss integrals · 0.1pairwise alignment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Fast large-scale clustering of protein structures using Gauss integrals
abstract
MOTIVATION: Clustering protein structures is an important task in structural bioinformatics. De novo structure prediction, for example, often involves a clustering step for finding the best prediction. Other applications include assigning proteins to fold families and analyzing molecular dynamics trajectories. RESULTS: We present Pleiades, a novel approach to clustering protein structures with a rigorous mathematical underpinning. The method approximates clustering based on the root mean square deviation by first mapping structures to Gauss integral vectors--which were introduced by Røgen and co-workers--and subsequently performing K-means clustering. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to current methods, Pleiades dramatically improves on the time needed to perform clustering, and can cluster a significantly larger number of structures, while providing state-of-the-art results. The number of low energy structures generated in a typical folding study, which is in the order of 50,000 structures, can be clustered within seconds to minutes.
Tim Harder, Mikael Borg, Wouter Boomsma, Peter Røgen, Thomas Hamelryck
Bioinform.1
2010 Beyond rotamers: a generative, probabilistic model of side chains in proteins
abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurately covering the conformational space of amino acid side chains is essential for important applications such as protein design, docking and high resolution structure prediction. Today, the most common way to capture this conformational space is through rotamer libraries - discrete collections of side chain conformations derived from experimentally determined protein structures. The discretization can be exploited to efficiently search the conformational space. However, discretizing this naturally continuous space comes at the cost of losing detailed information that is crucial for certain applications. For example, rigorously combining rotamers with physical force fields is associated with numerous problems. RESULTS: In this work we present BASILISK: a generative, probabilistic model of the conformational space of side chains that makes it possible to sample in continuous space. In addition, sampling can be conditional upon the protein's detailed backbone conformation, again in continuous space - without involving discretization. CONCLUSIONS: A careful analysis of the model and a comparison with various rotamer libraries indicates that the model forms an excellent, fully continuous model of side chain conformational space. We also illustrate how the model can be used for rigorous, unbiased sampling with a physical force field, and how it improves side chain prediction when used as a pseudo-energy term. In conclusion, BASILISK is an important step forward on the way to a rigorous probabilistic description of protein structure in continuous space and in atomic detail.
Tim Harder, Wouter Boomsma, Martin Paluszewski, Jes Frellsen, Kristoffer E. Johansson, Thomas Hamelryck
BMC Bioinform.1
2007 Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures
abstract
MOTIVATION: Most methods that are used to compare protein structures use three-dimensional (3D) structural information. At the same time, it has been shown that a 1D string representation of local protein structure retains a degree of structural information. This type of representation can be a powerful tool for protein structure comparison and classification, given the arsenal of sequence comparison tools developed by computational biology. However, in order to do so, there is a need to first understand how much information is contained in various possible 1D representations of protein structure. RESULTS: Here we describe the use of a particular structure fragment library, denoted here as KL-strings, for the 1D representation of protein structure. Using KL-strings, we develop an infrastructure for comparing protein structures with a 1D representation. This study focuses on the added value gained from such a description. We show the new local structure language adds resolution to the traditional three-state (helix, strand and coil) secondary structure description, and provides a high degree of accuracy in recognizing structural similarities when used with a pairwise alignment benchmark. The results of this study have immediate applications towards fast structure recognition, and for fold prediction and classification.
Iddo Friedberg, Tim Harder, Rachel Kolodny, Einat Sitbon, Jim Zhanwen Li, Adam Godzik
Bioinform.2