EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott P. Overmyer
dblp:19/681 · also Scott Overmyer
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
0000-0002-5285-1929ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
conceptual modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Conceptual Modeling through Linguistic Analysis Using LIDA · ICSE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements analysis
natural language requirements analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Conceptual Modeling through Linguistic Analysis Using LIDA · ICSE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design › object-oriented analysis and design
object-oriented analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Conceptual Modeling through Linguistic Analysis Using LIDA · ICSE 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linguistic analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Face Tracking Using Mean-Shift Algorithm: A Fuzzy Approach for Boundary Detection
Farhad Dadgostar, Abdolhossein Sarrafzadeh, Scott P. Overmyer |
ACII | 3 |
| 2003 | Facial Expression Analysis for Estimating Learner?s Emotional State in Intelligent Tutoring SystemsabstractIntelligent tutoring systems (ITS) provide individualized instruction. They offer many advantages over the traditional classroom scenario: they are always available, nonjudgmental and provide tailored feedback resulting in increased and effective learning. However, they are still not as effective as one-on-one human tutoring. The next generation of intelligent tutors is expected to be able to take into account the cognitive and emotional state of students. We present a proposed contribution of affect to student modeling, and reports on the progress made in the development of a facial expression analysis component for intelligent tutoring systems. Abdolhossein Sarrafzadeh, Hamid Gholamhosseini, Scott P. Overmyer |
ICALT | 4 |
| 2002 | Case study: factors for early prediction of software development success
J. Drew Procaccino, June M. Verner, Scott P. Overmyer, Marvin E. Darter |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 3 |
| 2001 | Conceptual Modeling through Linguistic Analysis Using LIDAabstractDespite the advantages that object technology can provide to the software development community and its customers, the fundamental problems associated with identifying objects, their attributes, and methods remain: it is a largely manual process driven by heuristics that analysts acquire through experience. While a number of methods exist for requirements development and specification, very few tools exist to assist analysts in making the transition from textual descriptions to other notations for object-oriented analysis and other conceptual models. We describe a methodology and a prototype tool. Linguistic Assistant for Domain Analysis (LIDA), which provide linguistic assistance in the model development process. We first present our methodology to conceptual modeling through linguistic analysis. We give an overview of LIDA's functionality and present its technical design and the functionality of its components. We also provide a comparison of LIDA's functionality with that of other research prototypes. Finally, we present an example of how LIDA is used in a conceptual modeling task. Scott P. Overmyer, Benoit Lavoie, Owen Rambow |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2000 | What's Different about Requirements Engineering for Web Sites?
Scott P. Overmyer |
Requir. Eng. | 1 |
| 1999 | In the 25 years since The Mythical Man-Month what have we learned about project management?
June M. Verner, Scott P. Overmyer, Katherine W. McCain |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 2 |
| 1999 | A Methodology for Constructing User-Oriented Requirements Specifications for Large-Scale Systems Using Electronic Hypermedia
Scott P. Overmyer |
Requir. Eng. | 1 |
| 1991 | Validating system and software requirements: extending the Davis-Jordan requirements metamodel to the 'user's view'abstractThe Davis-Jordan requirements metamodel (DJRM) is a model and accompanying notation which allows system and software requirements to be represented independent of the method employed to capture those requirements (A.M. Davis and K.A. Jordan, 1990). They describe a concept of requirements as a sphere (of requirements) surrounded by a Lucite box. The idea is that requirements may be viewed from a variety of perspectives (e.g. data flow diagram (DFD), object-oriented analysis (OOA), finite state machine (FSM), Statechart, etc.) represented as sides of the transparent box,but that these perspectives have common characteristics which may be represented in a metamodel. While DJRM may be an excellent vehicle for allowing requirements engineers to view requirements from a variety of perspectives, model neglects two important players in the requirements process: the user and the customer. It is proposed that a mapping is possible from the DJRM into an existing rapid prototyping tool and a pictorial system simulation tool which, when augmented by a user interface design concept layer, is capable of specifying the external behavior of an interactive system from the user's view. The level of completeness of this specification is directly dependent upon the completeness of the DJRM representation.> Scott P. Overmyer |
RSP | 1 |