Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Henry J. Landau

dblp:19/857 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Information theory · 94% Coding theory · 6%
Computer networks
2 papers
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › signal processing
spectral estimation
0.011998
Maximum Entropy and Maximum Likelihood in Spectral Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Information theory › signal processing
sampling theory
0.021993
On the density of phase-space expansions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1993
Extrapolating a band-limited function from its samples taken in a finite interval · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1986
Information theory › signal processing › sampling theory
nyquist rate
0.011993
On the density of phase-space expansions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1993
Information theory › signal processing
time-frequency analysis
0.011993
On the density of phase-space expansions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1993
Physical-layer communications › channel coding
minimum distance
0.011988
On the minimum distance problem for faster-than-Nyquist signaling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1988
Physical-layer communications
signal detection
0.011988
On the minimum distance problem for faster-than-Nyquist signaling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1988
Information theory › signal processing › sampling theory
oversampling
0.011986
Extrapolating a band-limited function from its samples taken in a finite interval · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1986
Information theory › signal processing
signal recovery
0.011986
Extrapolating a band-limited function from its samples taken in a finite interval · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1986
Physical-layer communications › modulation
constellation design
0.011984
Optimum waveform signal sets with amplitude and energy constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1984
Physical-layer communications
modulation
0.011984
Optimum waveform signal sets with amplitude and energy constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1984
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coding bounds
minimum distance bounds
0.011984
Optimum waveform signal sets with amplitude and energy constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1984
Information theory › signal processing
signal design
0.011984
Optimum waveform signal sets with amplitude and energy constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1984
Information theory › communication channels
intersymbol interference
0.011988
On the minimum distance problem for faster-than-Nyquist signaling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1988
Information theory › probability theory › stochastic processes
prediction theory
0.011986
Extrapolating a band-limited function from its samples taken in a finite interval · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1986
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › combinatorial coding theory
permutation codes
0.011971
How does a porcupine separate its quills? · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1971
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coded modulation
permutation modulation codes
0.011971
How does a porcupine separate its quills? · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1971
Coding theory › source coding › quantization
vector quantization
0.011971
How does a porcupine separate its quills? · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convex averaging · 0.0autocorrelation analysis · 0.0phase-space decomposition · 0.0fourier approximation · 0.0density analysis · 0.0square-integrable function analysis · 0.0sharp bound derivation · 0.0nyquist sampling · 0.0error analysis · 0.0geometric bounds · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Shannon theory: Perspective, trends, and applications special issue dedicated to Aaron D. Wyner
Henry J. Landau, James E. Mazo, Shlomo Shamai, Jacob Ziv
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1998 Maximum Entropy and Maximum Likelihood in Spectral Estimation
abstract
The power spectral measure, an informative feature of a stationary time-discrete stochastic process, describes the relative strength of uncorrelated frequency components that compose the process. In spectral estimation one wants to describe the spectral measures of processes having a prescribed initial block of autocorrelation coefficients. In the continuum of possibilities, two types are frequently distinguished: the one-parameter family of maximum-likelihood spectral measures, so named because they carry the largest possible weight at one specified frequency, and the maximum-entropy spectral measure which is often considered to be the most representative of the entire set of possible solutions. Although these choices are very different, representing, respectively, the most and least predictable of the eligible processes, we show that the maximum-entropy measure is exactly the uniform average of the family of maximum-likelihood measures over its parameter.
Henry J. Landau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1993 On the density of phase-space expansions
abstract
Phase-space decompositions for signals of finite energy have been used to formulate the intuitive but elusive idea that frequency content of a signal can vary with time as the signal evolves. The decompositions consist of subdividing the time and frequency axes into certain ranges and expanding signals stably in a two-parameter basis of fixed functions of time, in which the (k,m)th coefficient is viewed as describing the part of the signal that is concentrated in the kth time and mth frequency range. It is shown that in any such expansion, the time-frequency space must be subdivided, or, equivalently, the coefficients computed, at least at the Nyquist rate of two per unit of time and cycle of bandwidth.>
Henry J. Landau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1988 On the minimum distance problem for faster-than-Nyquist signaling
abstract
The authors reconsider the problem of determining the minimum distance between output sequences of an ideal band-limiting channel that are generated by uncoded binary sequences transmitted at a rate exceeding the Nyquist rate. For signaling rates up to about 25% faster than the Nyquist rate, it is shown that the minimum distance does not drop below the value which it would have in the ideal case wherein there is not intersymbol interference. Mathematically, the problem is to decide if the best L/sup 2/ Fourier approximation to the constant 1 on the interval (- sigma pi , sigma pi ), 00, with coefficients restricted to be =1 or =0, occurs when all coefficients are zero. This is shown to be optimal for 0.802...>
James E. Mazo, Henry J. Landau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
1986 Extrapolating a band-limited function from its samples taken in a finite interval
abstract
A band-limited signal of finite energy can be reconstructed from its samples taken at the Nyquist rate. Moreover, the reconstruction is stable, a feature crucial for implementation: a small error in the sample values generates only a correspondingly small error in the resulting signal. The Nyquist sample values are mutually independent, so that knowledge of them in a given interval- T \leq t \leq 0provides hardly any information about the behavior of the signal outside the interval. However, when the samples are taken at a greater rate--a case referred to as "over-sampling"--they are interrelated, and this redundancy can be exploited in various ways to improve the behavior of the reconstruction procedure. A natural question is whether it can also be used to form accurate estimates of the signal outside the interval of observation; this problem is relevant as well to prediction theory. With oversampling, whenT = \infty, so that the samples are known on the entire half-linet < 0, they determine the signal everywhere, although the reconstruction is now no longer stable. Here we examine the case of finiteT;of course, a finite amount of data can yield only limited accuracy. We prove that the samples can be used to form an approximation to the signal outside the sampling interval, with an error which, asymptotically asT \rightarrow \infty, decreases exponentially inT, over a range which grows linearly withT. However, as in the limiting case, these approximations are not useful in practice, since they require the sample values to be known exactly. In the presence of measurement error, the nature of the results changes: good approximations are now available for only a bounded distance outside the interval of observation, regardless of its length, and their accuracy and range of validity can be increased only by improving the precision of sample reading. Since physical measurements are never perfect, it is this conclusion which counts for applications. The same results hold for the extrapolation of bounded band-limited signals.
Henry J. Landau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1984 Optimum waveform signal sets with amplitude and energy constraints
abstract
It is desirable to choose the waveforms making up a signaling alphabet so that they are maximally separated one from another. This problem is considered, in the space of square-integrable functions, for signals which have finite duration, and are constrained in the ranges of their values as well as in energy. Corresponding to each of the following cases, we establish sharp bounds for the minimum distance and for the average distance between elements of a fixed size signal set, and construct sets of signals that attain both bounds simultaneously. \begin{list} \item {\em Case A (Energy Constraint Only):} The average energy of the waveforms in the signal set is at most\sigma, where0 \leq \sigma < \infty. \item {\em Case B (Energy and Peak Amplitude Constraints):} The average energy of the waveforms in the signal set is\leq \sigma (0 \leq \sigma < 1), and the absolute value of each waveform is at most1. \item {\em Case C (Energy and Value Constraints):} The average energy of the waveforms in the signal set is at mostb^{2}\sigma + a^{2}(1 - \sigma), and each waveform takes values in the set[a, b], where0 \leq a < b < \infty, and0 \leq \sigma \leq 1. \end{list} Cases A and B are applicable to signal design for communication in channels with additive noise (say Gaussian), and Case C is applicable to signal design for optical channels, where the signal represents the intensity of a photon stream. The general character of the results is that the minimum distance behaves like\gamma \sigmain Cases A and B, and like\gamma \sigma (1 - \sigma)in Case C, with\gammaa suitable constant.
Aaron D. Wyner, Henry J. Landau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
1971 How does a porcupine separate its quills?
abstract
Sets of unit vectors inN-dimensional Euclidean vector space whose constituent vectors are separated one from another by at least a fixed distanced, prescribed once for all and independent ofN, are of interest in theory and practice; they have fondly been called "porcupine codes." Although an elegant constructive proof of Gilbert shows that the number of vectors in a porcupine code (of givend) can increase exponentially withN, no systematic method is yet known for generating porcupine codes of this cardinality. Corresponding to a collection ofMvectors, we can partition the space into maximum-likelihood regions, thejth of which consists of those vectors that lie closer to thejth than to any other element of the collection. Each maximum-likelihood region is bounded by at most(M - 1)hyperplanes, and we denote byKthe total number of these bounding hyperplanes. Collections for whichKis small may be expected to have greater symmetry than those for whichKis large. In this paper we show that, for porcupine codes,K \geq (M/2)^{1/s}, withsdepending only ond, the minimum separation of the code vectors. Hence, for the number of vectors of a porcupine code to increase exponentially with dimension, the number of separating hyperplanes must do so as well. We conclude with, an application to the permutation codes introduced by Slepian, showing that the number of vectors of a porcupine code which is of permutation-modulation type can not increase exponentially withN.
Henry J. Landau
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1