Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Royce

dblp:19/8887 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.112010
CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration detection
0.112010
CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis
0.012010
CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1depth-of-coverage analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Copy number abnormalities (CNAs) represent an important type of genetic mutation that can lead to abnormal cell growth and proliferation. New high-throughput sequencing technologies promise comprehensive characterization of CNAs. In contrast to microarrays, where probe design follows a carefully developed protocol, reads represent a random sample from a library and may be prone to representation biases due to GC content and other factors. The discrimination between true and false positive CNAs becomes an important issue. RESULTS: We present a novel approach, called CNAseg, to identify CNAs from second-generation sequencing data. It uses depth of coverage to estimate copy number states and flowcell-to-flowcell variability in cancer and normal samples to control the false positive rate. We tested the method using the COLO-829 melanoma cell line sequenced to 40-fold coverage. An extensive simulation scheme was developed to recreate different scenarios of copy number changes and depth of coverage by altering a real dataset with spiked-in CNAs. Comparison to alternative approaches using both real and simulated datasets showed that CNAseg achieves superior precision and improved sensitivity estimates. AVAILABILITY: The CNAseg package and test data are available at http://www.compbio.group.cam.ac.uk/software.html.
Sergii Ivakhno, Tom Royce, Anthony J. Cox, Dirk J. Evers, R. Keira Cheetham, Simon Tavaré
Bioinform.2