Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Günther Platsch
dblp:19/8938
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0009-0003-2681-5558ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › computational anatomy
anatomical landmark detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Personalized Graphical Models for Anatomical Landmark Localization in Whole-Body Medical Images · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Personalized Graphical Models for Anatomical Landmark Localization in Whole-Body Medical Images · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
personalized graphical model · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Personalized Graphical Models for Anatomical Landmark Localization in Whole-Body Medical Images
Vaclav Potesil, Timor Kadir, Günther Platsch, J. Michael Brady |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |
| 2010 | Improved Anatomical Landmark Localization in Medical Images Using Dense Matching of Graphical ModelsabstractWe propose a method for reliably and accurately identifying anatomical landmarks in 3D CT volumes based on dense matching of parts-based graphical models. Such a system can be used to establish reliable correspondences in medical images which can be useful on their own or as part of more complex processing e.g. atlas building. We propose and investigate novel methods for efficiently optimizing parameters of appearance models for landmark localization in 3D images. We also investigate the trade-off between the number of model parameters and registration accuracy. We present results for the localization of 22 landmarks in clinical 3D CT volumes of cancer patients and optimization of part-specific patch scales. Over-fitting is likely due to an intrinsically high variability of the data and a limited labeled training and test set, here 83 scans, so we employ a rigorous bootstrap analysis to validate the results. The average mean and maximum registration error over all landmarks is reduced by 31% and 25% for the optimized model, compared to an empirically determined baseline. Additionally, we show a significantly improved performance over standard methods as the number of free parameters increases from an isotropic patch scale shared by all parts, to specific anisotropic patch scales learnt for each part in the model. Vaclav Potesil, Timor Kadir, Günther Platsch, J. Michael Brady |
BMVC | 3 |