Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lily Mast

dblp:190/1251 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › code recommendation
API recommendation
0.212016
API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Software maintenance and evolution
code recommendation
0.212016
API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution
code changes
0.112016
API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes · SIGSOFT FSE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes
abstract
Learning and remembering how to use APIs is difficult. While code-completion tools can recommend API methods, browsing a long list of API method names and their documentation is tedious. Moreover, users can easily be overwhelmed with too much information. We present a novel API recommendation approach that taps into the predictive power of repetitive code changes to provide relevant API recommendations for developers. Our approach and tool, APIREC, is based on statistical learning from fine-grained code changes and from the context in which those changes were made. Our empirical evaluation shows that APIREC correctly recommends an API call in the first position 59% of the time, and it recommends the correct API call in the top five positions 77% of the time. This is a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art approaches by 30-160% for top-1 accuracy, and 10-30% for top-5 accuracy, respectively. Our result shows that APIREC performs well even with a one-time, minimal training dataset of 50 publicly available projects.
Anh Tuan Nguyen 0001, Michael Hilton 0001, Mihai Codoban, Hoan Anh Nguyen, Lily Mast, Eli Rademacher, Tien N. Nguyen, Danny Dig
SIGSOFT FSE5