Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lily Mast
dblp:190/1251
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › code recommendation
API recommendation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Software maintenance and evolution
code recommendation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution
code changes |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changesabstractLearning and remembering how to use APIs is difficult. While code-completion tools can recommend API methods, browsing a long list of API method names and their documentation is tedious. Moreover, users can easily be overwhelmed with too much information. We present a novel API recommendation approach that taps into the predictive power of repetitive code changes to provide relevant API recommendations for developers. Our approach and tool, APIREC, is based on statistical learning from fine-grained code changes and from the context in which those changes were made. Our empirical evaluation shows that APIREC correctly recommends an API call in the first position 59% of the time, and it recommends the correct API call in the top five positions 77% of the time. This is a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art approaches by 30-160% for top-1 accuracy, and 10-30% for top-5 accuracy, respectively. Our result shows that APIREC performs well even with a one-time, minimal training dataset of 50 publicly available projects. Anh Tuan Nguyen 0001, Michael Hilton 0001, Mihai Codoban, Hoan Anh Nguyen, Lily Mast, Eli Rademacher, Tien N. Nguyen, Danny Dig |
SIGSOFT FSE | 5 |