Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Delz

dblp:190/2263 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 91% Image and video processing · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
graph visualization
0.312017
Magnostics: Image-Based Search of Interesting Matrix Views for Guided Network Exploration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017
Visualization and visual analytics
matrix reordering
0.312017
Magnostics: Image-Based Search of Interesting Matrix Views for Guided Network Exploration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017
Visualization and visual analytics › multivariate data visualization
matrix visualization
0.312017
Magnostics: Image-Based Search of Interesting Matrix Views for Guided Network Exploration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017
Image and video processing
pattern detection
0.112017
Magnostics: Image-Based Search of Interesting Matrix Views for Guided Network Exploration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature descriptor evaluation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Magnostics: Image-Based Search of Interesting Matrix Views for Guided Network Exploration
abstract
In this work we address the problem of retrieving potentially interesting matrix views to support the exploration of networks. We introduce Matrix Diagnostics (or Magnostics), following in spirit related approaches for rating and ranking other visualization techniques, such as Scagnostics for scatter plots. Our approach ranks matrix views according to the appearance of specific visual patterns, such as blocks and lines, indicating the existence of topological motifs in the data, such as clusters, bi-graphs, or central nodes. Magnostics can be used to analyze, query, or search for visually similar matrices in large collections, or to assess the quality of matrix reordering algorithms. While many feature descriptors for image analyzes exist, there is no evidence how they perform for detecting patterns in matrices. In order to make an informed choice of feature descriptors for matrix diagnostics, we evaluate 30 feature descriptors-27 existing ones and three new descriptors that we designed specifically for MAGNOSTICS-with respect to four criteria: pattern response, pattern variability, pattern sensibility, and pattern discrimination. We conclude with an informed set of six descriptors as most appropriate for Magnostics and demonstrate their application in two scenarios; exploring a large collection of matrices and analyzing temporal networks.
Michael Behrisch 0001, Benjamin Bach, Michael Blumenschein, Michael Delz, Laura von Rüden, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Tobias Schreck
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.4