Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leonid Zeynalvand

dblp:190/4304 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › trust modeling
reputation assessment
0.412020
COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
trust and reputation
0.412020
COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020
Authentication and access control › trust management
trust evaluation
0.412020
COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy-accuracy tradeoff
0.112020
COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

context-aware modeling · 0.9bernoulli neural network · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment
abstract
Trust and reputation management (TRM) plays an increasingly important role in large-scale online environments such as multi-agent systems (MAS) and the Internet of Things (IoT). One main objective of TRM is to achieve accurate trust assessment of entities such as agents or IoT service providers. However, this encounters an accuracy-privacy dilemma as we identify in this paper, and we propose a framework called Context-aware Bernoulli Neural Network based
Leonid Zeynalvand, Tie Luo 0001, Jie Zhang 0002
AAAI1
2018 MASA: Multi-Agent Subjectivity Alignment for Trustworthy Internet of Things
abstract
The vastly diverse and increasingly autonomous Internet of Things (IoT) devices stress trust management as a critical requirement of IoT. This paper addresses subjectivity as an important issue in trust management for IoT. Subjectivity means that the information provided by each autonomous IoT device, represented by an agent, is likely to have been influenced by the device's individual preference, which can be misleading in trust evaluation. In this paper, we seek to align the potentially subjective information with the information seeker's own subjectivity so that the acquired second-hand information is more useful and personalized. Accordingly, we propose a multiagent subjectivity alignment (MASA) mechanism, which models the subjectivity using a regression technique and exchanges the models among agents as the input to an alignment process. This mechanism substantially counteracts biases incurred by different agents and improves the accuracy of second-hand information fusion as demonstrated by our simulations. In addition, we also conduct experiments using a real-world dataset (MovieLens) which further validates the efficacy of MASA.
Leonid Zeynalvand, Jie Zhang 0002, Shuo Chen 0006, Tie Luo 0001
FUSION1
2017 Reshaping Mobile Crowd Sensing Using Cross Validation to Improve Data Credibility
abstract
Data credibility is a crucial issue in mobile crowd sensing (MCS) and, more generally, people- centric Internet of Things (IoT). Prior work takes approaches such as incentive mechanism design and data mining to address this issue, while overlooking the power of crowds itself, which we exploit in this paper. In particular, we propose a cross validation approach which seeks a validating crowd to verify the data credibility of the original sensing crowd, and uses the verification result to reshape the original sensing dataset into a more credible posterior belief of the ground truth. Following this approach, we design a specific cross validation mechanism, which integrates four sampling techniques with a privacy-aware competency-adaptive push (PACAP) algorithm and is applicable to time-sensitive and quality-critical MCS applications. It does not require redesigning a new MCS system but rather functions as a lightweight "plug-in", making it easier for practical adoption. Our results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism substantially improves data credibility in terms of both reinforcing obscure truths and scavenging hidden truths.
Tie Luo 0001, Leonid Zeynalvand
GLOBECOM2