Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leonid Zeynalvand
dblp:190/4304
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › trust modeling
reputation assessment |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
trust and reputation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020 |
Authentication and access control › trust management
trust evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy-accuracy tradeoff |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation Assessment · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
context-aware modeling · 0.9bernoulli neural network · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | COBRA: Context-Aware Bernoulli Neural Networks for Reputation AssessmentabstractTrust and reputation management (TRM) plays an increasingly important role in large-scale online environments such as multi-agent systems (MAS) and the Internet of Things (IoT). One main objective of TRM is to achieve accurate trust assessment of entities such as agents or IoT service providers. However, this encounters an accuracy-privacy dilemma as we identify in this paper, and we propose a framework called Context-aware Bernoulli Neural Network based Leonid Zeynalvand, Tie Luo 0001, Jie Zhang 0002 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | MASA: Multi-Agent Subjectivity Alignment for Trustworthy Internet of ThingsabstractThe vastly diverse and increasingly autonomous Internet of Things (IoT) devices stress trust management as a critical requirement of IoT. This paper addresses subjectivity as an important issue in trust management for IoT. Subjectivity means that the information provided by each autonomous IoT device, represented by an agent, is likely to have been influenced by the device's individual preference, which can be misleading in trust evaluation. In this paper, we seek to align the potentially subjective information with the information seeker's own subjectivity so that the acquired second-hand information is more useful and personalized. Accordingly, we propose a multiagent subjectivity alignment (MASA) mechanism, which models the subjectivity using a regression technique and exchanges the models among agents as the input to an alignment process. This mechanism substantially counteracts biases incurred by different agents and improves the accuracy of second-hand information fusion as demonstrated by our simulations. In addition, we also conduct experiments using a real-world dataset (MovieLens) which further validates the efficacy of MASA. Leonid Zeynalvand, Jie Zhang 0002, Shuo Chen 0006, Tie Luo 0001 |
FUSION | 1 |
| 2017 | Reshaping Mobile Crowd Sensing Using Cross Validation to Improve Data CredibilityabstractData credibility is a crucial issue in mobile crowd sensing (MCS) and, more generally, people- centric Internet of Things (IoT). Prior work takes approaches such as incentive mechanism design and data mining to address this issue, while overlooking the power of crowds itself, which we exploit in this paper. In particular, we propose a cross validation approach which seeks a validating crowd to verify the data credibility of the original sensing crowd, and uses the verification result to reshape the original sensing dataset into a more credible posterior belief of the ground truth. Following this approach, we design a specific cross validation mechanism, which integrates four sampling techniques with a privacy-aware competency-adaptive push (PACAP) algorithm and is applicable to time-sensitive and quality-critical MCS applications. It does not require redesigning a new MCS system but rather functions as a lightweight "plug-in", making it easier for practical adoption. Our results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism substantially improves data credibility in terms of both reinforcing obscure truths and scavenging hidden truths. Tie Luo 0001, Leonid Zeynalvand |
GLOBECOM | 2 |