Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Amin Yekani

dblp:190/6819 · also Aminreza Yekani · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-9522-5998ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 70% Optical networks · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › digital subscriber line
discrete multitone
0.412019
Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019
Optical networks › optical transmission
optical modulation formats
0.412019
Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019
Physical-layer communications › modulation › pulse modulation
pulse amplitude modulation
0.412019
Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019
Physical-layer communications › optical communication
intensity modulation direct detection
0.112019
Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-analytical bit error rate model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD
abstract
We theoretically compare the performance of optical discrete multi-tone (DMT) and pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) using intensity modulated and direct detection. PAM is a lower cost, lower complexity solution than DMT, however, it is more vulnerable to chromatic dispersion on the C-band. We compare DMT and PAM taking into consideration the interplay of laser linewidth, fiber length, transmission rate, and channel bandwidth. We use a semi-analytical model to examine bit error rates. We study how system parameters shift the performance advantages between DMT and PAM. Our model can also be used to find the best hardware solution and frequency band for a target modulation format and bit error rate.
Amin Yekani, Leslie A. Rusch
IEEE Trans. Commun.1