EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amin Yekani
dblp:190/6819 · also Aminreza Yekani
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-9522-5998ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 70% Optical networks · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › digital subscriber line
discrete multitone |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Optical networks › optical transmission
optical modulation formats |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Physical-layer communications › modulation › pulse modulation
pulse amplitude modulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Physical-layer communications › optical communication
intensity modulation direct detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDD · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-analytical bit error rate model · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Interplay of Bit Rate, Linewidth, Bandwidth, and Reach on Optical DMT and PAM With IMDDabstractWe theoretically compare the performance of optical discrete multi-tone (DMT) and pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) using intensity modulated and direct detection. PAM is a lower cost, lower complexity solution than DMT, however, it is more vulnerable to chromatic dispersion on the C-band. We compare DMT and PAM taking into consideration the interplay of laser linewidth, fiber length, transmission rate, and channel bandwidth. We use a semi-analytical model to examine bit error rates. We study how system parameters shift the performance advantages between DMT and PAM. Our model can also be used to find the best hardware solution and frequency band for a target modulation format and bit error rate. Amin Yekani, Leslie A. Rusch |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |